Why doesn't DI have a versus mode?
Games like call of duty, counter-strike, l4d/l4d2, and team fortress 2 prove that replayability is in team warfare, why did the developers of DI leave a versus mode out?
My opinion, co-op is only going to keep people interested for "so" long. Once the co-op gets old, people will be going back to games like black ops, tf2, l4d/l4d2, counter-strike,,,,,,.
How long can a co-op game keep someones interest before they get bored?
Ever since the release of games like team fortress and counter-strike, the focus has been on team warfare - there are a few exceptions like borderlands, but for the most part the popular games are based on teams fighting each other.
After playing through borderlands on co-op, I knew there was no way it had the replayability like what l4d/l4d2 does. And the same will probably go for DI.
Does anyone that has DI expect it to be a 500+ hour game? How about 1,000+ hours?
This is one of the dumbest posts I've read. How can you compare such different games in such a silly manner.
I do not understand why you call my post dumb?
Buy dead island, come back and post when you're bored. Do you think you will hit the 100 hour mark before your bored?
Have you ever played left 4 dead or left 4 dead 2? People like playing the infected better then playing the survivors. So give the people what they want.
Games need to keep up with the times. Playing co-op in a zombie game is not staying with current trends. Playing a co-op or single player zombie game, is like playing pong in single player, or talking to yourself in a chatroom.
Having some kind of versus mode in dead island would have greatly increased its replayability. Team based games over the past decade have proven that point time and time again.
L4D is clearly designed for multiplayer while Dead Island feels like a single player game with co-op thrown in as an afterthought.
Like I said, game developers need to keep up with current trends.
What are the greatest games of all time? Doom, Quake, Quake 2, Quake 3, Counter-Strike, Team Fortress Classic, Team Fortress 2, world of warcraft,,,,,; why were those games great, they were deathmatch or team based games.
There are exceptions, such as fallout, fallout 3, fallout new vegas, half-life, half-life 2,,, which are single player games.
Doom was single player, but had lan support for multiplayer.
For dead island to be a great game, its going to need to be on a half-life, half-life 2 or fallout scale.
You know what games people do not remember, or rarely mention, the games that did not have multi-player, where not epic or were full of bugs. How many people talk about Sin or Blood as being great games? They were released around the same time as quake, doom and duke nukem.
So far it seems that dead island is starting off like homefront or brink, and off to a buggy start.
How many people talk about Sin or Blood as being great games?
However saying that every game needs multiplayer to be great is just stupid.
For dead island to be a great game, its going to need to be on a half-life, half-life 2 or fallout scale.
Anyway, I'm glad to see Dead Island is keeping up with current trends. And by "current trends", I mean "releasing totally unfinished and full of bugs".![]()
Anyway, I'm glad to see Dead Island is keeping up with current trends. And by "current trends", I mean "releasing totally unfinished and full of bugs".![]()
Why are you glad DI is full of bugs?
the thing is
there is a decent game in here
alot to like
as much to not like
Do you own the record to 15,000 posts the fastest here? I can see why.
I think the developers of dead island have shown how much they care about the consumer.
Instead of unlocking the game on Friday and giving people a 3 day weekend to play, the game is unlocked in the last few hours of labor day.
~~ EDIT ~~
I think I will be boycotting dead island, just because they waited until the end of monday to release the game. People get a 3 day weekend, and the publisher / developers can not even give the consumers something to play? Blah.
Do you own the record to 15,000 posts the fastest here? I can see why.
Like I said, game developers need to keep up with current trends.
What are the greatest games of all time? Doom, Quake, Quake 2, Quake 3, Counter-Strike, Team Fortress Classic, Team Fortress 2, world of warcraft,,,,,; why were those games great, they were deathmatch or team based games.
There are exceptions, such as fallout, fallout 3, fallout new vegas, half-life, half-life 2,,, which are single player games.
Doom was single player, but had lan support for multiplayer.
For dead island to be a great game, its going to need to be on a half-life, half-life 2 or fallout scale.
You know what games people do not remember, or rarely mention, the games that did not have multi-player, where not epic or were full of bugs. How many people talk about Sin or Blood as being great games? They were released around the same time as quake, doom and duke nukem.
So far it seems that dead island is starting off like homefront or brink, and off to a buggy start.
To play the PC version of Dead Island in its current form you're going to need incredible patience and a willingness to fight through some very clunky game mechanics. As it stands, I can't recommend this in any way, shape, or form. This is a game that needed more time to bake, and hopefully after a few patches we'll be able to enjoy the game hidden under the unpolished exterior.
from what I have gathered about this game so far, it is so NOT a game that should be MP.
quake and doom were released around the same time? really? are you SURE?
Have you ever played left 4 dead or left 4 dead 2? People like playing the infected better then playing the survivors. So give the people what they want.