darkamulets
Senior member
- Feb 21, 2002
- 784
- 0
- 76
WHS vs 2003/2008 server std has a few big diffrences
WHS can not connect to a domain or be a domain controller. So if you already have a domain or want to create one WHS is not what you want.
WHS cost wise is a great option, its a stripped down 2003 server with storage and print server features with out the $700 lic cost.
2003/2008 std can run any number of apps that you wish to load including the OEM storage server Edition if you have access to it (same OS that many of the higher end NAS run on with 2003).
If you run 2003 or 2008 I would upgrade the CPU and ram as they have more overhead then WHS and much more then the EMC software
I've kept the default CPU/Memory and the little machine is doing fine. I don't see it doing any form of transcoding but for normal file server stuff it's happy.