Originally posted by: Tweak155
I plan on cutting out a lot of the original text because this is getting too long:
A2: Get 3.17.
I went from memory (and still am). It was actually something like 3.1.0.7 or something similar to that. Either way it was re-downloaded several days ago so I'm assuming it was the latest from
www.trillian.cc.
Cool. What does the publisher say about the issue?
A2: Yes, a new OS does do that, as people learn how to use it. The point is, though, you've got a clear solution to the problem.
The fact that I HAD TO DO THAT was the problem. Maybe I didn't make that clear when I stated
A: Didn't have to do this before and
A: The point is I didn't have to do it before. I had to find a solution to the problem that Vista created for me.
Well, yes, Vista works slightly differently.... but you've got a solution now, so...
A2: I have an 8800GTS/320 and an nVidia 6200 - both using 158 (Vista release version) and they work very well. Have you tried them? Note: This isn't XP's driver; it's Vista's.
This is similar to your Blackberry response. Seeing as you didn't want me to respond to that one before, I won't make the same mistake again, now that you've specified.
Fair enough. Sorry you're having an issue; it works great here and for others I've spoken with that run Vista... did you contact nVidia on the issue?
A2: I just can't imagine someone would get excited about a service that uses so little CPU and disk time that it's unnoticeable on a remotely modern machine. Why would this be a concern?
I said its annoying. I don't see an improvement. Its additional task to index the C drive. I thought changes were supposed to make things better, at least in my mind.
So you've gone thru the entire Vista machine to micromanage every facet of it? (Otherwise how would you pick this up?) -- Black Viper's theories (disable every service you don't use, etc.) have been widely debunked; why do this or why worry about it? Is there something concrete that you're losing or unable to do because a low-priority background scan/index is taking place?
A2: Erm, huh? WM devices work great in Vista using the Microsoft-supplied software. What, exactly, is the issue you're having, other than that a CD from 2005 or so is no longer the correct software to use? Essentially, to me it sounds like you're complaining about a software update! "Skip it" doesn't say anything technical.
The CD from 2005 WORKED. I can't believe you still aren't reading what I've wrote. The Microsoft-Supplied software, DID NOT WORK. Again, maybe I didn't make that clear with
The program that came with the phone WORKED, whereas what came with Vista did not. I seriously wonder if you respond without reading.
A2: I have an Audiovox 5600 (2003 SE is the OS on the phone) and it works perfectly (I rarely use it, which is why I focused on the BB). What, exactly, doesn't work? "Skip it" doesn't tell me anything technical...
It (the program) freezes at the point of detecting the phone. WM 5.0. I used the "old" 2005 software and connected right up.
Amazing. File a bug report with Microsoft.
A2: What's the technical issue in your network connection that it's trying to fix?
I don't remember now, but I remember thinking it was annoying it was not simple to run a repair. I believe the actual solution had to do with restarting my modem. I should clarify you can still repair in Vista, but AFTER Vista tries to solve the problem for you. It really wasted my time since the repair didn't even work.