• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Dateline NBC

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Mandatory death penalty for child molestors would stop it. Too bad most voters and law makers are too sympathetic to them to enact such a penalty.

Yes, because the death penalty has stopped all murderers from killing people.
So we should give sex offenders a slap on the back for the good job they've done and put them in out-patient counseling???? Get real. :roll:

we need to re adjust the way our legal system punishes crimes. sex offenders get off virtually scott free while there are non-violent drug offenders spending the rest of their lives in prison.
 
Originally posted by: DVK916
The problem I have with PJ is they classify 20 year olds who want to some love from a 14 year olds the same as 50 year olds who want sex from 10 year old. I don't see the big deal with a 20 year old guy and a 14 year old girl.
You have got to be kidding.
 
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Mandatory death penalty for child molestors would stop it. Too bad most voters and law makers are too sympathetic to them to enact such a penalty.

Yes, because the death penalty has stopped all murderers from killing people.


To be far, the death penalty has a 100% success rate. Actually it's like 110% since we routinely execute innocents, too!
 
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: DVK916
The problem I have with PJ is they classify 20 year olds who want to some love from a 14 year olds the same as 50 year olds who want sex from 10 year old. I don't see the big deal with a 20 year old guy and a 14 year old girl.
You have got to be kidding.


No, I think the law should be 8 years younger and atleast 14 years old. As long as they are atleast 14 and no more than 8 years younger than you then it should be legal. Just my opinion.
 
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
I'm glad the cops are actually in on this one this time.

BTW, for the folks that don't know, this time they're in Riverside county, CA.

riverside ftw. lol
 
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: DVK916
The problem I have with PJ is they classify 20 year olds who want to some love from a 14 year olds the same as 50 year olds who want sex from 10 year old. I don't see the big deal with a 20 year old guy and a 14 year old girl.
You have got to be kidding.


No, I think the law should be 8 years younger and atleast 14 years old. As long as they are atleast 14 and no more than 8 years younger than you then it should be legal. Just my opinion.
You're one sick bastard.

And obviously you have no children of your own.
 
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: DVK916
The problem I have with PJ is they classify 20 year olds who want to some love from a 14 year olds the same as 50 year olds who want sex from 10 year old. I don't see the big deal with a 20 year old guy and a 14 year old girl.
You have got to be kidding.


No, I think the law should be 8 years younger and atleast 14 years old. As long as they are atleast 14 and no more than 8 years younger than you then it should be legal. Just my opinion.
You're one sick bastard.

And obviously you have no children of your own.


Ok, I would never date someone under 18, but I am just saying I don't understand what is so bad. Do you really have a problem with a 20 year old and a 14 year old being together. In my countries the age of consent is 14.
 
Originally posted by: Syringer
Yes, because the death penalty has stopped all murderers from killing people.

<sarcasm>Yes because most murders get the dealth penalty.</sarcasm>

And if you think that a child molestor is the same as a murder, you need your head examined.

Murders are not sane, most child molestors simply have an addiction that I believe that be frightened into submission.
 
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: DVK916
The problem I have with PJ is they classify 20 year olds who want to some love from a 14 year olds the same as 50 year olds who want sex from 10 year old. I don't see the big deal with a 20 year old guy and a 14 year old girl.
You have got to be kidding.


No, I think the law should be 8 years younger and atleast 14 years old. As long as they are atleast 14 and no more than 8 years younger than you then it should be legal. Just my opinion.
You're one sick bastard.

And obviously you have no children of your own.


Ok, I would never date someone under 18, but I am just saying I don't understand what is so bad. Do you really have a problem with a 20 year old and a 14 year old being together. In my countries the age of consent is 14.
Yes, I really have a problem with that. And I'm not concerned with your 'countries'.
 
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Yes, I really have a problem with that. And I'm not concerned with your 'countries'.

Smoochy, DVK916 knows nothing, he is just a kid himself, he's 16. He has no accurate perspective of the matter.
 
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Yes, I really have a problem with that. And I'm not concerned with your 'countries'.

Smoochy, DVK916 knows nothing, he is just a kid himself, he's 16. He has no accurate perspective of the matter.


:disgust: , I am 22. I do have a good perspective of the matter.
 
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Yes, I really have a problem with that. And I'm not concerned with your 'countries'.

Smoochy, DVK916 knows nothing, he is just a kid himself, he's 16. He has no accurate perspective of the matter.


:disgust: , I am 22. I do have a good perspective of the matter.
You do NOT have a good perspective of the matter. For you, it's all about the coochie.

Think about this entire thing again in a few years or so if/when you or your brother/sister/friend has a child and starts accessing the internet. Let us know how you feel about these online child predators then.
 
Originally posted by: JLGatsby

Smoochy, DVK916 knows nothing, he is just a kid himself, he's 16. He has no accurate perspective of the matter.

If that is truly the case then I think we can safely ignore him.

At 16 he probably feels quite mature, at 24 (which would be OK in his book) he'll look back and think "Damn I really was a kid."

8 years makes a HUGE difference from teenagers to 20 somethings.

[EDIT]I see you're 22... Do you not see a vast difference in maturity between yourself now and when you were 14?[/EDIT]

Viper GTS
 
Originally posted by: DVK916
:disgust: , I am 22. I do have a good perspective of the matter.

I have a bad memory, lol. But at 22, you should know better. You clearly are not able to put yourself in other people's shoes.
 
Originally posted by: Sundog
I watched the first one and TBO can not watch another one. I get too angry about that kind of sh$t. :|

But if a candidate if your state ran for office promising a mandatory death penalty for sex offenders, would you vote for him?

If not, then you can't be that angry.
 
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: Sundog
I watched the first one and TBO can not watch another one. I get too angry about that kind of sh$t. :|

But if a candidate if your state ran for office promising a mandatory death penalty for sex offenders, would you vote for him?

If not, then you can't be that angry.


Against children....yes. I would volunteer to throw the switch, push the syringe or pull the trigger. I have NO problem with capital punishment.
 
Originally posted by: Sundog
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: Sundog
I watched the first one and TBO can not watch another one. I get too angry about that kind of sh$t. :|

But if a candidate if your state ran for office promising a mandatory death penalty for sex offenders, would you vote for him?

If not, then you can't be that angry.


Against children....yes. I would volunteer to throw the switch, push the syringe or pull the trigger. I have NO problem with capital punishment.
:thumbsup:
 
These guys disgust me. That one moron who drove by while the cops were there and called the girl, who told him they were there for her neighbors, he's just too stupid to live. I mean come on, is he really that stupid?
 
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: SmoochyTX
Originally posted by: DVK916
The problem I have with PJ is they classify 20 year olds who want to some love from a 14 year olds the same as 50 year olds who want sex from 10 year old. I don't see the big deal with a 20 year old guy and a 14 year old girl.
You have got to be kidding.


No, I think the law should be 8 years younger and atleast 14 years old. As long as they are atleast 14 and no more than 8 years younger than you then it should be legal. Just my opinion.
You're one sick bastard.

And obviously you have no children of your own.
He is not sick, this is very normal in Europe (speaking for Czech Republic).
 
Back
Top