fuck yes I would...
![]()
Why wouldn't we leave all of our oil in the ground until the day comes when everyone else is used up?
Because I think we will be off of oil, at least for the most part, before that day ever comes...
fuck yes I would...
![]()
Why wouldn't we leave all of our oil in the ground until the day comes when everyone else is used up?
Do you think that we should shut down all existing pipelines that go near any water supply?
Because I think we will be off of oil, at least for the most part, before that day ever comes...
Why destroy more of the Earth?
Oil has other uses aside from burning.
sure.
But see my last post about what we should be doing with the oil on this continent.
Coal is still heavily used...During the industrial revolution it was coal, now it's oil. We will then go to something else. Let human progress continue. It will take oil to do that, much like it took coal to bring on oil.
If history is any indicator it is that things evolve.
The pipeline is crossing under a lake. Pretty sure any body of water that large is publicly owned as a navigable waterway.Isn't this happening on private property? What should the police do? What should the developer of the project do? Just fold up?
Agreed, but water rights are a really big thing out west. Water is relatively scarce and the fauna tends to be rare, often endemic, and usually already threatened by development, pollution, water usage and exotic competitors.The only problem is the pipeline is outside of their territory plus the land owners / tribe members gave permission to have this on the property so if anyone should be upset it should be the rest of their community for allowing their fellow members / tribal council as sell outs.
Just because something 70 miles away might affect you someday does not mean you have the right to violate laws as we have seen like they have been doing otherwise no one would ever be able to build anything.
Not really the same thing. He served, which meant at any moment he could be whisked off to serve in a war zone or potential hot spot where indigents would seek to maim or kill him. For someone like myself who never served, that same fate would require a major war, a world war. It's not combat, true, but it's a totally different magnitude from the risk the rest of us take.Gotta love these quotes:
"Most civilians who’ve never served in a uniform are gutless worms who’ve never been in a fight in their life,” Wes Clark Jr. declares. “
"He served on active duty from 1992–1996 — “nothing dangerous,” he says."
"Clark Jr. may never have served in combat"
So we are gutless worms who have never been in a fight but he isn't because he served for a whole 4 years in a non-combat role? He could have washed clothes or did paperwork for 4 years for all we know but that qualifies him to make a statement like that? Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to take anything away from his service just his statement.
Coal is still heavily used...
The pipeline is crossing under a lake. Pretty sure any body of water that large is publicly owned as a navigable waterway.
I know pipelines have to cross stream drainage basins, otherwise they wouldn't be much use. But that crossing makes me nervous as hell. A leak deep under water would take a lot of time to isolate, shut down, and fix. It could devastate the local ecosystem.
Agreed, but water rights are a really big thing out west. Water is relatively scarce and the fauna tends to be rare, often endemic, and usually already threatened by development, pollution, water usage and exotic competitors.
Not really the same thing. He served, which meant at any moment he could be whisked off to serve in a war zone or potential hot spot where indigents would seek to maim or kill him. For someone like myself who never served, that same fate would require a major war, a world war. It's not combat, true, but it's a totally different magnitude from the risk the rest of us take.
I was talking about the protesting.The pipeline is crossing under a lake. Pretty sure any body of water that large is publicly owned as a navigable waterway.
I know pipelines have to cross stream drainage basins, otherwise they wouldn't be much use. But that crossing makes me nervous as hell. A leak deep under water would take a lot of time to isolate, shut down, and fix. It could devastate the local ecosystem.
Not really the same thing. He served, which meant at any moment he could be whisked off to serve in a war zone or potential hot spot where indigents would seek to maim or kill him. For someone like myself who never served, that same fate would require a major war, a world war. It's not combat, true, but it's a totally different magnitude from the risk the rest of us take.
Hell depending on where this guy has lived, my life in NOLA could very well have been far more dangerous than his entire life including his military service. That doesn't take away from his service, just his bullshit statement.
I got my open water cert there, the ecosystem consists of 20 carp, there's no water shortage there either.
Fresh water diver?
You poor thing.
http://www.kfyrtv.com/content/news/...rotest-camp-on-Army-Corps-land-403459616.html
ND Gov tells protestors to evacuate.
They're expecting a blizzard tomorrow, this should be interesting.
![]()
ND winters are harsh as hell, they're not going to force them out, but even emergency services are a bitch in the winter up there.
Good thing the pipeline isn't going through Bismark -- that's right, they voted against it citing possible water contamination and moved it further south
