IceBergSLiM
Lifer
- Jul 11, 2000
- 29,932
- 3
- 81
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
the cost of drugs would be less if they were legalized...
Not if they were taxed - and they would be. Alcohol and cigarettes are taxed.
you are saying one thing then the opposite. You said they wouldn't be cheap because of taxes. Then you named two cheap taxed items....
![]()
![]()
Alcohol and cigarettes aren't cheap! WTF are you talking about? How much do you think the tobacco inside a pack of cigarettes costs to produce?
the non brand cigs can be had for 3 dollars a pack in some states. I can purchase a forty oz beer for $1.79
Exactly.
Think about it again - how much do you think that tobacco and paper is worth? 1 cent? 0.1 cent?
whenever you want to start making sense I will resume this conversation. You are arguing legalized drugs would cost more. I want to know your logic behind this. Taxes is not a relevant argument's because you have no idea what the tax structure would be based on. They clearly wouldn't tax it to the point that it would be unaffordable because that would create a black market again.
I reasoned that if you tax something, it will become more expensive - that seems to me to be true by definition.
However, I am not a student of economics. Can you enlighten me on how taxing something could make it cheaper?
you are assuming that they are going to sell the drugs at the current black market street price + tax. They clearly wouldnt. Drugs are only expensive because 1) cost to smuggle, transport etc 2) risk
eliminate those 2 factors and cost can be reduced dramatically. a 20 dollar bag is now only 5 bucks. A 5 dollar crack rock is now only a dollar. get it?