Anyone notice that that was tested with gk 110?
I did, I'd like to see benchmarks with GK104s to see what sort of bottlenecking the vast majority of gamers will face.
Anyone notice that that was tested with gk 110?
I call 2 FPS a large margin partially because the difference in cost, so I should rephrased that as "a large margin in performance/$" as some would consider a $300+ CPU losing to a competitor's $200 chip by any margin an embarrassing defeat.
gtx580
Your card is still a beast. Grab one of those MC deals if you're close to one (say a 2500k or FX 6300) and you'll be able to play @720... i think
Depends on the game, the i5-760 may be working at 90-100% when the Phenom X6 1100T only at 40-50%. So you could OC the Phenom and not the i5 with the default cooler.
good find.
"root of all evil" pushed the cpu and amd falls behind again. so much for 8 core.
party over.
Using only 4 cores is "CPU pushed"? Not for a FX...
"8 core" is actually 8 thread in case of FX8xxx. It has 4 FP "units",same as i5 and i7 . Both designs can run two threads per fp unit(or core in intel's case).