Crysis 3 CPU performance test

csbin

Senior member
Feb 4, 2013
838
351
136
multi-core game;)



0nIkCAb.jpg
 

fixbsod

Senior member
Jan 25, 2012
415
0
0
bu-bu-bu-bu no point in HT and we should all stick to i5-3570s right! pfft -- for $100 i'll take some HT please.
 

Greenlepricon

Senior member
Aug 1, 2012
468
0
0
They really should have ivy bridge up there, but we can all sorta guess on where it would be at this point anyway. Glad to see AMD isn't doing as poorly on new games as it is in other areas!
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,056
409
126
interesting results,
I'm curious to see results from other sources,

also comparing to their result of the alpha MP, it's quite different

crysis%203%20proz.png
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
bu-bu-bu-bu no point in HT and we should all stick to i5-3570s right! pfft -- for $100 i'll take some HT please.

OMG - The difference between the 2500K and the 2600K is enormous!! I should sell my 3570K and get a 3770K, HT is really spreading it's wings in this benchmark.

In all seriousness, the 8350 is doing very well in this game. Good showing for AMD on this one.
 

shady28

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2004
2,520
397
126
Really impressive for AMD. Battlefield 3 is also a newer, highly threaded game where AMD does well, though it is more limited by the GPU.

The Russian site also noted that dual-core (aka Pent and i3) need not apply with Crysis 3, quad core and better only.

Sadly, most GPUs won't measure up either. Looks like you need a 660 class GPU or better to do 1920x1080 at a reasonable framerate, and they're recommending 1.5GB of VRAM.

http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/crysis-3-test-gpu.html
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
They really should have ivy bridge up there, but we can all sorta guess on where it would be at this point anyway. Glad to see AMD isn't doing as poorly on new games as it is in other areas!

They only add new CPUs when Intel/AMD send them free ones. FX8350 wasn't in benchmarks for a while after launch until AMD sent them a sample.

Very impressive showing when a developer codes for multi-core CPUs. If FX8350 had Sandy Bridge IPC, it would have been one fast CPU for modern multi-threaded games. Hopefully AMD can get IPC up 20-25% with Steamroller.
 

Red Hawk

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2011
3,266
169
106
There definitely seems to be a benefit from having more than 4 threads available; Intel's hexacore, AMD's octacore and Intel's hyperthreaded quad core processors all see benefits. AMD seems to benefit most of all. Good for them, it's nice to see their flagship CPU outdo Intel's best mid-tier part from 2011...it's better than they have done in the past...
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
There definitely seems to be a benefit from having more than 4 threads available; Intel's hexacore, AMD's octacore and Intel's hyperthreaded quad core processors all see benefits. AMD seems to benefit most of all. Good for them, it's nice to see their flagship CPU outdo Intel's best mid-tier part from 2011...it's better than they have done in the past...

Too bad Intel seems to be stubbornly resisting upping their clock speed or offering a mainstream hex core part though.
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,056
409
126
How the heck is a phenom X2 faster than an i3-530?


indeed, look at their Crysis 3 MP alpha testing, the 530 is a lot faster, it's a really strange result, I wonder what changed the results so much (the relative performance from these CPUs, even if the SP is really a lot more demanding)...
 
Last edited:

Tsavo

Platinum Member
Sep 29, 2009
2,645
37
91
3770K @ 4GHz would be 12+ FPS faster than the 8350 while using 900 less watts.