What's that suppose to criticize? Just an FYI, originator is a professor at UC Riverside.
Search & Browse UCR Faculty & Staff
profiles.ucr.edu
What she teaches:
EDUC 147: Education for a Diverse Society
EDUC 148: Critical Race Analysis of K-12 Schools
EDUC 275a: Pedagogies of Racial Justice
EDUC 275b: Race and K-12 Educational Equity
EDUC 278: Critical Race Theory in Education
Resentment? Contempt? Sounds like quibbling. Amusingly, Amused used this as his go-to argument:
It's the result of racism. It's anger and resentment caused by racism.
I'll tell you this, were I oppressed, the blood of my oppressors would flow until I was free, or dead. You should be very thankful blacks are, on the average, a lot more peaceful than I would be. To a black person in the US facing institutionalized, systemic racism at every level of society, whites in general are understandably seen as the oppressor. You're just too stupid to see that, or racist to admit it.
CNN's Zain Asher speaks with Bernice King, the daughter of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., about the dangers of hatred and overcoming it.
www.cnn.com
“We have a hard time recognizing that racial discrimination is the sole cause of racial disparities in this country and in the world at large … When you truly believe that racial groups are equal, then you also believe that racial disparities must be the result of racial discrimination.”-
zachgoldberg.substack.com
The idea that persistent outcome disparities between racial groups necessarily reflect or result from discrimination rests on a narrow, misleading, and politically motivated portrayal of the empirical reality. In what follows, I introduce and briefly discuss a number of data points that call this narrative into question.
Disparities between groups are the norm, not the exception—even among ‘whites’.
Binary white vs. black comparisons merely obscure disparities that obtain between virtually all ethnic/ancestry groups while promoting the illusion that white-black disparities are somehow exceptional. Indeed, large disparities in socioeconomic outcomes are observed even between US-born whites of different European ancestry.
Otherwise, our conversation on race is deeply and perniciously fake.
johnmcwhorter.substack.com
Black people do not need to walk around in fear that white cops will kill them because they are black. Yes, I meant that and will write it again. Black people do not need to walk around in fear that white cops will kill them because they are black.
“But, but … he just, he just …” NO! I “just” nothing. I say this because of the following simple fact:
Cops kill white people just as easily as they kill black people.
I know there’s a bit more we will hear.
But the disproportion … !
Yes, yes – but please see my post on Derek Chauvin on that issue, which in no way disproves anything I have written. Black people are 2.5 times more likely to be killed by cops, and exactly 2.5 times more likely to be poor, and data shows that poverty makes you more likely to encounter the cops, as even intuition confirms. This is why somewhat more black people are killed by cops than what our proportion in the population would predict.
Accounts of this issue that pretend people like me have not presented figures like this – i.e. most mainstream media discussions -- are out of court, even if their authors feel it’s their duty to pull people’s eyes away from “irreligious” ideas. Ignore the numbers and, even if you are writing about descendants of African slaves, you are simply plain wrong.
[...]
Reflect also: most people who take to the streets about cases like Daunte Wright are not thinking about the fact that black people are killed by cops 2.5 times more than their representation in the population would predict. They are protesting because all they see in the news is the black people killed, and have no way of imagining that whites are regularly killed in the same way and in much greater numbers.
Facebook
Twitter