Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Lets get some intellegent responses here.....
As if you could inspire anything even remotely resembling intelligence.
I vote neither. The problems with this economy are far more vast than who is currently sitting in the President's chair.
Originally posted by: sportage
Yeah this news (so called) was on CNN.
They need to stop reporting this nonsense.
Jus because some high paid nutcase with ditto
head followers says something, doesn?t create
the need to report it.
Another bored reporter slacking on the job.
Probably spent the day playing xbox, then realized
he needed to turn in some news article before 5pm to cnn.
Also reported Ann Coulter said "something" today too along the same line,
reported on cnn.
Hey, my dog took a dump today in the front yard CNN, where's the 24/7
coverage on THAT??? :roll:
Originally posted by: sportage
Yeah this news (so called) was on CNN.
They need to stop reporting this nonsense.
Jus because some high paid nutcase with ditto
head followers says something, doesn?t create
the need to report it.
Another bored reporter slacking on the job.
Probably spent the day playing xbox, then realized
he needed to turn in some news article before 5pm to cnn.
Also reported Ann Coulter said "something" today too along the same line,
reported on cnn.
Hey, my dog took a dump today in the front yard CNN, where's the 24/7
coverage on THAT??? :roll:
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Right now If I was to point fingures I would have to point at Clinton . pushing equal access to credit markets by minorities. Than 9/11. I would say the idiot in the white house had nothing to do with credit problem . Bush didn't get us into IRAQ by himself. Dems pushed it just as hard. Lets see how fast they get us out of Iraq. LOL
Bush is just to stupid to have caused any off it. So what! He wasn't smart enough to fix anything either. Lets see how the Dems fix a problem they created.
I personnelly don't care if I lose everthing I have as far as $$$ goes . No big deal . Fact is A would love to see all americans at same level all poor . Because were never going to be all rich . I believe in equal rights . So equally poor sounds fair to me . Lets see who the survivors are. I was looking at wifes 401 K its ugly man . Only 50 % The other 50% is doing fine until the real facts hit the streets. Than I exspect all 401Ks to carry the same balance Zero dollars.
Just for the record . Myself and others predicted this over a year ago in this forum . We were quikly given tinfoil hats and flamed, I love my hat.
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I don't think Bush is the main cause of the economic problems nor do I think that he could have averted them with legislation, but there is no doubt he has had more of an affect and should shoulder a heck of a lot more responsibility than a senator who has been in Washington for 4 years. Anyone who thinks differently is just a disingenuous partisan hack.
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
I suspect I breath a lot easier than tho does. I been planning for this for years and Iam very well prepared. Trueth is in other post . I been same since day 1 . But many here have changed . WHY?
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
I suspect I breath a lot easier than tho does. I been planning for this for years and Iam very well prepared. Trueth is in other post . I been same since day 1 . But many here have changed . WHY?
??
Holding the same Opinion/Position is not a virtue. It's more like a lack of ability to Learn.
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: HomerJS
Lets get some intellegent responses here.....
As if you could inspire anything even remotely resembling intelligence.
I vote neither. The problems with this economy are far more vast than who is currently sitting in the President's chair.
Exactly, the Whitehouse was asking for tighter regulations back in 2003. Congress and the financial institutes are responsible. Obama was in the pocket book of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. He had gotten $126,349 from them.
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I don't think Bush is the main cause of the economic problems nor do I think that he could have averted them with legislation, but there is no doubt he has had more of an affect and should shoulder a heck of a lot more responsibility than a senator who has been in Washington for 4 years. Anyone who thinks differently is just a disingenuous partisan hack.
Fixed with bluntness to make a point.
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: Extelleron
I don't think Bush is the main cause of the economic problems nor do I think that he could have averted them with legislation, but there is no doubt he has had more of an affect and should shoulder a heck of a lot more responsibility than a senator who has been in Washington for 4 years. Anyone who thinks differently is just a disingenuous partisan hack.
Fixed with bluntness to make a point.
I wanted to quote orginal . But this is good . Extelleron . Bush tried to push leg. threw congress Dems blocked matter of public record.
Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
This is what it's gonna be like every weekday for the next four years. Rush has three frickkin' hours a day to fill with his particular brand of bilgewater. If someone's dog shits in a neighbor's yard somewhere, Rush is going to blame it on Obama or 'liberals'.
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
I agree I hope you learn alot in next 3 years . Sincerly.