Not really. It comes back to the same argument of 'if you think taxes should be higher why don't you just start paying more yourself?', and it's equally fallacious. Global warming is a collective action problem and wide scale policy changes are needed, not fewer limos used by heads of state. Changing their method of transportation wouldn't do a single thing, and so to argue that heads of state should take meaningless action to show their commitment to science is silly.
So it's not a big deal to live it up when there is no impending crisis? Gotcha.My electric bill is about $40 a month and I split that with a roommate. Time to light up the night!
Not really. It comes back to the same argument of 'if you think taxes should be higher why don't you just start paying more yourself?', and it's equally fallacious. Global warming is a collective action problem and wide scale policy changes are needed, not fewer limos used by heads of state. Changing their method of transportation wouldn't do a single thing, and so to argue that heads of state should take meaningless action to show their commitment to science is silly.
So it's not a big deal to live it up when there is no impending crisis? Gotcha.
Not really. It comes back to the same argument of 'if you think taxes should be higher why don't you just start paying more yourself?', and it's equally fallacious. Global warming is a collective action problem and wide scale policy changes are needed, not fewer limos used by heads of state. Changing their method of transportation wouldn't do a single thing, and so to argue that heads of state should take meaningless action to show their commitment to science is silly.
It was a joke.
1. I am going to go outside by my pool and spray two full 32oz cans of Aqua Net right at the ozone.
2. I am going to use a gas powered scooter to go from room to room in my house, which will have all the outside doors open wide while the A/C is blowing full blast.
3. I am going to buy a 69 GTO with no exhaust system and let it idle for 4 hours a day in my driveway every day until Jesus returns.
4. I am going to fart as much as possible.
5. Speaking of farting, I am going to feed my cows bean dip and only bean dip.
6. I am going to set my thermostat on 85 in the winter and 55 in the summer.
7. I am going to use all my curly cue fluorescent light bulbs for clay pigeonsand not clean up the mess.
8. I am going to air up my tires on my 69 Goat so much that it looks like a frickin Macys Parade float.
9. When I go grizzly bear hunting in Alaska this spring I am going to add a polar bear to my license and take one of those as well.
10. While in Alaska I will take a blowtorch to a glacier to get my drinking water.
11. In addition, I am going to throw snowballs at seals. It wont hurt them, but they will understand that the game is back on.
12. And finally, I am going to make certain my girls have Horners book "Red Hot Lies" and Milloys book "Green Hell" so that when their profs and goofy friends open their mouths on behalf global warming they can go Stone Cold Steve Austin on them with the cold, hard facts.
Um. The laws more than allow you to pay more taxes if you think they should be higher. You are more then welcome to do so. So do it.
Except liberals are inherently hypocrites because they are all for redistribution of wealth as long as it isn't their money.
Yes they do. My point was that choosing to have one person pay higher taxes themselves was a moronic idea, just like what people were saying here. It's also comparable to having someone who supports war with Iran go grab a rifle and personally invade the country without any help. They are all collective action problems.
Not the brightest bulb I see.
Yes they do. My point was that choosing to have one person pay higher taxes themselves was a moronic idea, just like what people were saying here. It's also comparable to having someone who supports war with Iran go grab a rifle and personally invade the country without any help. They are all collective action problems.
Not the brightest bulb I see.
No leading by example? Hmm... here's a hint, if you think it's a good idea for the "collective" good of our citizen and since it is possible for you to take action on your own(unlike your asinine suggestion about Iran) then why aren't you doing it? Why wait for the gov't to force you to?
And this being Scandinavia, even the prostitutes are doing their bit for the planet. Outraged by a council postcard urging delegates to "be sustainable, don't buy sex," the local sex workers' union – they have unions here – has announced that all its 1,400 members will give free intercourse to anyone with a climate conference delegate's pass. The term "carbon dating" just took on an entirely new meaning.
WAIT, WAIT, WAIT !!!!!!!
We got this far in this thread without ANYONE here mentioning this gem (Did ANY of you actually read the article?) :
(In this case)
UNION FTW!!!
(also)
SCANDINAVIAN WOMEN FTW!!!!
WAIT, WAIT, WAIT !!!!!!!
We got this far in this thread without ANYONE here mentioning this gem (Did ANY of you actually read the article?) :
(In this case)
UNION FTW!!!
(also)
SCANDINAVIAN WOMEN FTW!!!!
Well, because of liberals and the income tax, 47% of Americans pay zero federal income taxes so essentially there is a collective action problem, paying for your fair share.
This summit should have been done as a video conference to set an example...sounds more like the lords of the earth dividing the pie.
Opening video of Climate summit. Talk about your propaganda! Submit your monies and will or the girl gets it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OIPYUlHv38&feature=player_embedded#
Yah Im surprised it took the third page to realize they get free hookers too
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20091205/tod-prostitutes-to-offer-free-sex-to-un-7f81b96.html
Yes they do. My point was that choosing to have one person pay higher taxes themselves was a moronic idea, just like what people were saying here. It's also comparable to having someone who supports war with Iran go grab a rifle and personally invade the country without any help. They are all collective action problems.
Not the brightest bulb I see.
change starts one person at a time. You and the rest of the guilt-ridden libs can go back to the good old days of 70% (or so) marginal tax rates. The guilty libs don't think the poor have enough, fine. That collection of hand-wringers can give 90% of their money away and still live like kings; let's see them do it. But no, they have to live on their exalted perch so that they can better govern the new serf-class that they would see created.
You have to be poor; freeze in the winter and bake in the summer. I must remain comfortable to watch over you.
You must have second-rate health coverage. But i must have the best so that i can watch over you.
You must not have guns lest you hurt yourself. But i shall have my bodyguards to defend me so that i may watch over you.
You should not have the means to travel lest you pollute mother earth. But i must be allowed to travel the world to enrich myself so that i may better watch over you.
You must eat lettuce and pasta to promote good health. But i must eat steak so that i have the strength to watch over you.
You must not have evil cigars or fine scotch. But i must have these indulgences because i must rejuvenate myself by partying because watching over you is so stressful.
screw you!
Using your 'logic' GWB and Cheney should be in Iraq. I'm all for it by the way. :thumbsup:Some some people don't think this is such a good joke. They wonder why they are being asked to sacrifice so that the guys in top hats and girdles get to party on their dime. The reactions are notable.
Doug Giles posted a response to the latest shenanigans being put upon us by the Holy Church of Anthropogenic Global Warming. He is a man of God and is not taking this usurpation lightly.
Sounds reasonable to me.
