Conroe in July

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

imported_Questar

Senior member
Aug 12, 2004
235
0
0
That link you posted on capacity is based on an outdated story that CNet wrote back in October

No, it's from April 4th - three weeks ago.

As to a link on market numbers for Yonah, there obviously isn't one yet...it's from research I have done myself

So then it's conjecture on your part.


One final thing - if AMD can exceed 30% market share today, then how come they are selling every chip then can ship - but they don't have 30% market share?

I'm done arguing with you, I don't care if people are gullable enough to believe your prattle. I'll just keep bulking up on my Intel shares - another 7,000 today.

 

Bobthelost

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,360
0
0
Originally posted by: Questar
That link you posted on capacity is based on an outdated story that CNet wrote back in October

No, it's from April 4th - three weeks ago.

As to a link on market numbers for Yonah, there obviously isn't one yet...it's from research I have done myself

So then it's conjecture on your part.


One final thing - if AMD can exceed 30% market share today, then how come they are selling every chip then can ship - but they don't have 30% market share?

I'm done arguing with you, I don't care if people are gullable enough to believe your prattle. I'll just keep bulking up on my Intel shares - another 7,000 today.

Linky

AMD now accounts for 21.4 percent of all desktop, notebook and server processors using the x86 instruction set that were shipped during the fourth quarter, Mercury Research plans to announce next week. The chipmaker's share grew from 17.7 percent in the third quarter, on strong gains in all three of those segments.

Thought you might like to see this. From January this year. Disctinctly less than 30%.
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: Questar
That link you posted on capacity is based on an outdated story that CNet wrote back in October

No, it's from April 4th - three weeks ago.

I said BASED ON...this means that the facts they used in the April story are directly from the October story, and they obviously didn't think they needed to get new facts.


As to a link on market numbers for Yonah, there obviously isn't one yet...it's from research I have done myself

So then it's conjecture on your part.

Exactly...of course what you call conjecture I call actually studying and research, but I guess that's the reason my portfolio has done so well.


One final thing - if AMD can exceed 30% market share today, then how come they are selling every chip then can ship - but they don't have 30% market share?

It must be the Rapture...you have finally given a very good and intelligent question/comment (thank you)! My reply is that you are absolutely correct...I should have said the end of the year (in my own defense I wrote the comment at about 4AM and didn't check what I was writing).
Now maybe you can think about a fact as well...AMD is currently at over 21% marketshare without much of the equipment in Fab36 yet, before any product from Chartered has been counted, and still on 90nm. Do you still honestly believe that their production capacity will be any less than 30% by year's end??

I'm done arguing with you, I don't care if people are gullable enough to believe your prattle. I'll just keep bulking up on my Intel shares - another 7,000 today.

Fair enough...BTW, some of those "gullible people" actually work for Intel, and many are engineers. Welcome to the Forums...
Good luck on your investment (meant most sincerely!)...I don't think it's a bad one at all (though a week ago would have been better at $19.00).
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: Bobthelost
AMD now accounts for 21.4 percent of all desktop, notebook and server processors using the x86 instruction set that were shipped during the fourth quarter, Mercury Research plans to announce next week. The chipmaker's share grew from 17.7 percent in the third quarter, on strong gains in all three of those segments.

Thought you might like to see this. From January this year. Disctinctly less than 30%.

I think you missed the premise here Bob...we were discussing production capacity, not marketshare.
 

pkme2

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2005
3,896
0
0
:)
My observations is just that:
Intel controls almost 79% of the market. Down almost the whole market/production share (1969).
Intel admits it has chip problems, but solved it.
Intel admits losing market share, these past months, but will return with a vengeance.
To me it seems, AMD has gained and improved itself with its Opteron and X2.
AMD has risen from insignificant to a definite source of excellent processors.
That its cpu architecture is definitely futuristic.
That with vast improvements, allow us to get a superior product for less bucks.
That it doesn't have a heating problem like Intel.

Maybe I'm wrong in observing this, but what does a Joe Public know about these things, almost nothing.;)
 

dmens

Platinum Member
Mar 18, 2005
2,275
965
136
Originally posted by: Viditor
We will probably see reviews in July at the launch, but not product. I'm sure that many people will keep waiting, but 99% of the purchasers buy a computer when they actually need a computer.
AMD will continue to sell every CPU they can make through the end of this year (and remember that's a lot! AMD will have tripled their production capacity by year's end).
Next year is a different matter...there's a lot of things that will come into play then.
1. AMD's 65nm ramp and their clockspeed on the new chips
2. K8L is due out next year
3. How fast can Intel ramp clockspeed on Conroe
4. How good is Conroe across it's entire line
Many other factors as well, those are just a few...

Either way, Conroe just isn't a marketshare issue for either company in 2006. However, selling the Netburst Dual cores at near cost just might be...we shall have to see. Up till now, the Presler hasn't been nearly as popular as Intel had hoped (which is why they had to cut prices so drastically). By selling all of their DC Netburst chips so cheap, they will be cutting their margins tremendously (and they're already at the lowest point they've been in my memory). The problem for Intel is that once you cut prices, it's near impossible to raise them again and it effects purchasing attitudes across your whole line of processors (Intel found this out with Celeron).

Heh, you might be surprised how much intel management wants merom derivatives in the market. They're really going for it this time. P4 inventories are being burned off like there's no tomorrow (because there isn't one for P4) and merom is just about ready to ramp. Take those dates given in the analyst meeting and add 2 months for general availability would be my guess.

merom might not have much of an impact on '06, but the P4 selloff would. Funny enough, the CPU margins are still pretty good (thank the process guys), even at those prices. The fact that intel is throwing away money on a billion other things would be the reason their total net earnings aren't as high as before.

also, intel mgmt has pretty much finally acknowledged that AMD is here to stay, so hopefully there'll be a clearer vision for the future. imo intel's ms hemorrhage on desktop and DP server is going to stop as soon as merom is out, since at its launch, it is clearly a leadership product in those segments.
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: dmens
Originally posted by: Viditor
We will probably see reviews in July at the launch, but not product. I'm sure that many people will keep waiting, but 99% of the purchasers buy a computer when they actually need a computer.
AMD will continue to sell every CPU they can make through the end of this year (and remember that's a lot! AMD will have tripled their production capacity by year's end).
Next year is a different matter...there's a lot of things that will come into play then.
1. AMD's 65nm ramp and their clockspeed on the new chips
2. K8L is due out next year
3. How fast can Intel ramp clockspeed on Conroe
4. How good is Conroe across it's entire line
Many other factors as well, those are just a few...

Either way, Conroe just isn't a marketshare issue for either company in 2006. However, selling the Netburst Dual cores at near cost just might be...we shall have to see. Up till now, the Presler hasn't been nearly as popular as Intel had hoped (which is why they had to cut prices so drastically). By selling all of their DC Netburst chips so cheap, they will be cutting their margins tremendously (and they're already at the lowest point they've been in my memory). The problem for Intel is that once you cut prices, it's near impossible to raise them again and it effects purchasing attitudes across your whole line of processors (Intel found this out with Celeron).

Heh, you might be surprised how much intel management wants merom derivatives in the market. They're really going for it this time. P4 inventories are being burned off like there's no tomorrow (because there isn't one for P4) and merom is just about ready to ramp. Take those dates given in the analyst meeting and add 2 months for general availability would be my guess.

merom might not have much of an impact on '06, but the P4 selloff would. Funny enough, the CPU margins are still pretty good (thank the process guys), even at those prices. The fact that intel is throwing away money on a billion other things would be the reason their total net earnings aren't as high as before.

also, intel mgmt has pretty much finally acknowledged that AMD is here to stay, so hopefully there'll be a clearer vision for the future. imo intel's ms hemorrhage on desktop and DP server is going to stop as soon as merom is out, since at its launch, it is clearly a leadership product in those segments.

Good post, and I tend to agree Dmens (Sept for Conroe is my guess...). When you say "as soon as merom is out", I assume you mean as soon as Merom products are on the shelves...ODMs usually release their new models in January, so again I think we are in agreement that 07 is the year that Intel's big gains start to come.

As to the P4/PD "Firesale", I think it will be more difficult than we who know the technology assume. The problem for Intel is that the P4 and PD have gotten a rather poor reputation over the last 2 years...and even though this cost cutting certainly makes them a decent bargain, it will be hard to overcome that impression on the street.
For Otellini to be successful in what he's promised analysts and shareholders, selling P4s and PDs will be his hardest and most important job this year. The Conroes should be much easier...but that's next years story.

As a side note...I remeber when the A64 and Opteron were absolutely slaughtering the entire Intel line. There were many posters out there who wanted AMD management's collective head because they didn't gain marketshare in the first 6-9 months...
I think Intel supporters should take that to heart and cut Otellini some slack this year...that's just how the market works!
 

Madwand1

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2006
3,309
0
76
Originally posted by: Viditor
As to the P4/PD "Firesale", I think it will be more difficult than we who know the technology assume. The problem for Intel is that the P4 and PD have gotten a rather poor reputation over the last 2 years...and even though this cost cutting certainly makes them a decent bargain, it will be hard to overcome that impression on the street.

Intel already has the key to selling PD's at the entry level at least -- the cheapest prices bar none for a dual core. Dual core is very saleable, despite heat issues, esp. at low prices, esp. when AMD isn't seriously answering back. Even tech people who should know better -- not many apps optimized for dual core, etc., fall for them gladly. There have been some price drops in the X2 3800+, but Intel has gone farther, and if I'm not mistaken, the X2 3800+ is gone from the AM2 line altogether. So whichever PD's are priced for say around $200 or less should be selling like hotcakes (hehe).

 

MDme

Senior member
Aug 27, 2004
297
0
0
The X2 3800+ won't disappear with the AM2 line. in fact there is even a 3800 X2 EE part (energy efficient with a TDP of 35w)
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: Madwand1
Originally posted by: Viditor
As to the P4/PD "Firesale", I think it will be more difficult than we who know the technology assume. The problem for Intel is that the P4 and PD have gotten a rather poor reputation over the last 2 years...and even though this cost cutting certainly makes them a decent bargain, it will be hard to overcome that impression on the street.

Intel already has the key to selling PD's at the entry level at least -- the cheapest prices bar none for a dual core. Dual core is very saleable, despite heat issues, esp. at low prices, esp. when AMD isn't seriously answering back. Even tech people who should know better -- not many apps optimized for dual core, etc., fall for them gladly. There have been some price drops in the X2 3800+, but Intel has gone farther, and if I'm not mistaken, the X2 3800+ is gone from the AM2 line altogether. So whichever PD's are priced for say around $200 or less should be selling like hotcakes (hehe).



However except for the ppl who have bought this low price 805D have simply done it to OC it for great value...Ocers make up a very small amount of the market, and most agree without ocing that thing you get quite subpar performance...even in some SMP aware apps....Since most games are not SMP aware that chip is worse off then some chips from 3 years ago...
 

Henny

Senior member
Nov 22, 2001
674
0
0
Originally posted by: Viditor
Originally posted by: dmens
Originally posted by: Viditor
We will probably see reviews in July at the launch, but not product. I'm sure that many people will keep waiting, but 99% of the purchasers buy a computer when they actually need a computer.
AMD will continue to sell every CPU they can make through the end of this year (and remember that's a lot! AMD will have tripled their production capacity by year's end).
Next year is a different matter...there's a lot of things that will come into play then.
1. AMD's 65nm ramp and their clockspeed on the new chips
2. K8L is due out next year
3. How fast can Intel ramp clockspeed on Conroe
4. How good is Conroe across it's entire line
Many other factors as well, those are just a few...

Either way, Conroe just isn't a marketshare issue for either company in 2006. However, selling the Netburst Dual cores at near cost just might be...we shall have to see. Up till now, the Presler hasn't been nearly as popular as Intel had hoped (which is why they had to cut prices so drastically). By selling all of their DC Netburst chips so cheap, they will be cutting their margins tremendously (and they're already at the lowest point they've been in my memory). The problem for Intel is that once you cut prices, it's near impossible to raise them again and it effects purchasing attitudes across your whole line of processors (Intel found this out with Celeron).

Heh, you might be surprised how much intel management wants merom derivatives in the market. They're really going for it this time. P4 inventories are being burned off like there's no tomorrow (because there isn't one for P4) and merom is just about ready to ramp. Take those dates given in the analyst meeting and add 2 months for general availability would be my guess.

merom might not have much of an impact on '06, but the P4 selloff would. Funny enough, the CPU margins are still pretty good (thank the process guys), even at those prices. The fact that intel is throwing away money on a billion other things would be the reason their total net earnings aren't as high as before.

also, intel mgmt has pretty much finally acknowledged that AMD is here to stay, so hopefully there'll be a clearer vision for the future. imo intel's ms hemorrhage on desktop and DP server is going to stop as soon as merom is out, since at its launch, it is clearly a leadership product in those segments.

Good post, and I tend to agree Dmens (Sept for Conroe is my guess...). When you say "as soon as merom is out", I assume you mean as soon as Merom products are on the shelves...ODMs usually release their new models in January, so again I think we are in agreement that 07 is the year that Intel's big gains start to come.

As to the P4/PD "Firesale", I think it will be more difficult than we who know the technology assume. The problem for Intel is that the P4 and PD have gotten a rather poor reputation over the last 2 years...and even though this cost cutting certainly makes them a decent bargain, it will be hard to overcome that impression on the street.
For Otellini to be successful in what he's promised analysts and shareholders, selling P4s and PDs will be his hardest and most important job this year. The Conroes should be much easier...but that's next years story.

As a side note...I remeber when the A64 and Opteron were absolutely slaughtering the entire Intel line. There were many posters out there who wanted AMD management's collective head because they didn't gain marketshare in the first 6-9 months...
I think Intel supporters should take that to heart and cut Otellini some slack this year...that's just how the market works!



Conroe is very much "this years story". Intel has already toggled over to dual core and it represents over half their CPU volume.

300mm/65nm capacity is alive and well at 3 factories.

If Conroe was based on new silicon techology then it could be a slow ramp but that's not the case.
 

Fox5

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
5,957
7
81
Intel's Core cpu line includes what? Core Single and Core Duo, or does it have Conroe as well?
Well, lets say 50% of Intel's cpus are mobile, then 50% of that are Cores, that would about equal AMD's entire output.
22% of Intel's entire output (by volume) would be about three quarters of AMD's entire output.
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: Henny



Conroe is very much "this years story". Intel has already toggled over to dual core and it represents over half their CPU volume.

300mm/65nm capacity is alive and well at 3 factories.

If Conroe was based on new silicon techology then it could be a slow ramp but that's not the case.

I think you are painting all dual cores the same, and this is a big mistake...
Remember that Conroe is an integrated dual core, while all of the other desktop DC parts are MCMs (2 single cores glued together).
Secondly, Conroe is a big chip for the 65nm node (~140 mm2) because of the huge cache size. The bigger the chip, the lower the yield (more chances for a mistake on the die) as a rule of thumb.
Thirdly, we already know the ~volume Intel expects to ship from this foil. You need to keep in mind that these are shippings, and products take about 2 months to hit the shelves after being shipped. This means that Conroe won't be available until near the end of Q3 for the public, and that it will only represent a very small portion of Intel's desktop parts until next year.
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: Fox5
Intel's Core cpu line includes what? Core Single and Core Duo, or does it have Conroe as well?
Well, lets say 50% of Intel's cpus are mobile, then 50% of that are Cores, that would about equal AMD's entire output.
22% of Intel's entire output (by volume) would be about three quarters of AMD's entire output.

It's your premise that's way off here...

Intel's ASP (average selling price) for chips at the moment is under $150 according to their CC. To get to that average price, you can imagine that the vast majority are Celerons and Celeron based mobile chips. My guess is somewhere near 60%...
The rest of the chips are made up of P4, PD, PM, Itanium, Xeon, embedded processors (XScale), as well as some legacy PIIIs.
In addition, the vast majority of mobile chips are either PMs or Celeron...I'd be amazed if Core made up even 5% of the mobile sector so far (have a google and see how many Core Duo laptops are out there so far).
You can see that the Core architecture makes up only a very tiny percentage of Intel's overall chip sales...
 

dmens

Platinum Member
Mar 18, 2005
2,275
965
136
Of course yonahs are rare right now, there's still plenty of dothans to sell off. There's a big gap of time between making and selling a chip. In a few months time, 100% of 65nm capacity will be making cores. Doesn't change the fact that cedarmills will still be around.

In any case, merom will make a difference in 2006, not on market share, but on regaining leadership on both performance and power in segments budget desktop to server DP... which is a pretty important story, imo.
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: dmens
Of course yonahs are rare right now, there's still plenty of dothans to sell off. There's a big gap of time between making and selling a chip. In a few months time, 100% of 65nm capacity will be making cores. Doesn't change the fact that cedarmills will still be around.

In any case, merom will make a difference in 2006, not on market share, but on regaining leadership on both performance and power in segments budget desktop to server DP... which is a pretty important story, imo.

That leads me to a question I have had dmens...I haven't seen any Sossaman sales out there at all. My impression was that they were to be in the field already...have you heard anything on this?
 

Madwand1

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2006
3,309
0
76
Originally posted by: MDme
The X2 3800+ won't disappear with the AM2 line. in fact there is even a 3800 X2 EE part (energy efficient with a TDP of 35w)

I stand corrected then -- I'd seen it missing in some price lists.
 

Madwand1

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2006
3,309
0
76
Originally posted by: Duvie
However except for the ppl who have bought this low price 805D have simply done it to OC it for great value...Ocers make up a very small amount of the market, and most agree without ocing that thing you get quite subpar performance...even in some SMP aware apps....Since most games are not SMP aware that chip is worse off then some chips from 3 years ago...

The market that I was speaking about -- entry level dual core; I speak of in terms of people who don't really need or fully utilize or optimize the processor. I can argue that this is the case for many many people, including some enthusiasts, who could often use lesser processors. So the performance argument is not really imporant to my logic, but the label "dual core", and the low price is. Am I clear enough?

Let me try again: Even Ma & Pa will buy dual cores because the notion is itself cool. Performance in this example does not really matter; nobody's going to take the time to know the real answer, or they're going to have tons of performance for web browsing with any proc; they're merely making a purchase choice that appeals to them. Dual core and low price will often win here, without any further considerations.
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: Madwand1
Originally posted by: Duvie
However except for the ppl who have bought this low price 805D have simply done it to OC it for great value...Ocers make up a very small amount of the market, and most agree without ocing that thing you get quite subpar performance...even in some SMP aware apps....Since most games are not SMP aware that chip is worse off then some chips from 3 years ago...

The market that I was speaking about -- entry level dual core; I speak of in terms of people who don't really need or fully utilize or optimize the processor. I can argue that this is the case for many many people, including some enthusiasts, who could often use lesser processors. So the performance argument is not really imporant to my logic, but the label "dual core", and the low price is. Am I clear enough?

Let me try again: Even Ma & Pa will buy dual cores because the notion is itself cool. Performance in this example does not really matter; nobody's going to take the time to know the real answer, or they're going to have tons of performance for web browsing with any proc; they're merely making a purchase choice that appeals to them. Dual core and low price will often win here, without any further considerations.

Hmmm...we've had the "MHz Myth", are you talking about the "DualCore Deception"? ;)
 

ND40oz

Golden Member
Jul 31, 2004
1,264
0
86
Originally posted by: Madwand1
No deception, more like "I wanit too".

E.g. A rave review with no performance tests. Just plum pleased at a cheap dual core machine:

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31359

I don't think an inq article can be considered a review. I have both a 930 and X2 3800 system, for day to day tasks, they are pretty much the same. Ma and Pa will see the same results and now norton won't bring their computing experience to a screeching halt like it has in the past. The can now have a dedicated anti-virus/anti-spyware core and the other one can do the normal computing :)
 

dmens

Platinum Member
Mar 18, 2005
2,275
965
136
Originally posted by: Viditor
That leads me to a question I have had dmens...I haven't seen any Sossaman sales out there at all. My impression was that they were to be in the field already...have you heard anything on this?

Haven't heard a thing... have you seen them for sale? From what I know, they're reserved for builders.
 

dexvx

Diamond Member
Feb 2, 2000
3,899
0
0
Originally posted by: dmens
Originally posted by: Viditor
That leads me to a question I have had dmens...I haven't seen any Sossaman sales out there at all. My impression was that they were to be in the field already...have you heard anything on this?

Haven't heard a thing... have you seen them for sale? From what I know, they're reserved for builders.


Sossaman's are primarily reserved for Blades. They are unsurpassed in the performance/watt category.
 

Viditor

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,290
0
0
Originally posted by: dexvx

Sossaman's are primarily reserved for Blades. They are unsurpassed in the performance/watt category.

I know what they are supposed to be...but until we actually see them in the field we really don't know what they are. :)
That's the reason for my question...they began shipping in March, but I have yet to see any product announcements or benchmarking.
The only performance numbers I've seen came from SuperMicro on their sales pitch in Japan.
It shows the 2 GHz model at 31w and performing ~27% slower than Paxville at 3.6 GHz.
Xbit article
Now we know that the Opteron @ 2.4 GHz completely anhiliates (51% faster) the 3 GHz Paxville in 64bit, but drawing conclusions from this just doesn't cut it...
I really need a head to head comparison of the 275 HE and the Sossoman 2 GHz (the two top of the lines) to figure out the performance part of the perf/watt ratio...
We also don't really know what kind of power these 2 actually draw (TDPs are useless)...
The original reason I asked though is that I don't understand why things are so quiet on the Sossoman lately. I would have assumed at least SOME kind of data by now!
 

Madwand1

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2006
3,309
0
76
Originally posted by: ND40oz
I don't think an inq article can be considered a review.

Oh really? I would love to discuss semantics with you. Do continue, please.