Congrats,US, on your new nuclear powered cruise missile

[Fanatical Meat]

And you're an idiot.

I’m still waiting on those conviction numbers. I’ll give you a hint, it’s more than zero.

 

[Muse]

Sometimes I watch the pre-election Maddow stuff for a laugh. Remember her big news on Trump's taxes?


Let's go down memory lane... no agenda here, just real, not fake, news:

SlowSpyder's is clearly a puppet account set up by Russian agents. There's no one person behind SlowSpyder's posts, it's a propaganda machine. Do not imagine that there's a person to which you are replying or whose posts you are reading.

 

[dphantom]

I’m still waiting on those conviction numbers. I’ll give you a hint, it’s more than zero.

still zero

 

[Paratus]

still zero

Yup. As you can see thanks to the sharpie I’ve got the proof the number is 0

 

[Fanatical Meat]

still zero

For all those too lazy or too stupid to look it up here is an easy to read picture.

 

[Jhhnn]

For all those too lazy or too stupid to look it up here is an easy to read picture.

Trump's old pal, Roger Stone, should be on the list as well.

 

[dphantom]

Trump's old pal, Roger Stone, should be on the list as well.

yep, double checked. still nothing

 

[zinfamous]

Zero. The investigation found no evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia. They found a whole bunch of rats guilty of tax evasion and fraud, none of them were Trump.

10 counts of obstruction of justice, evidence thereof, by Trump, and most of it related to Russia.

Did you forget about those?

 

[zinfamous]

There you have it, not enough evidence.
It's also accurate to say there isn't enough evidence to convict you of murder.
We can mince words forever, but the bottom line is that they couldn't turn up any evidence. He wasn't impeached, even though the dems control the house.

again, that is not at all what happened. Plenty of evidence was detailed. It was never said that not enough to convict. Mueller said that he couldn't indict because his office is not allowed to. The evidence was very plainly laid out, in detail, for Congress to do its job.

I thought you were better with the reading than people like Slow?

 

[zinfamous]

yep, double checked. still nothing

Honest question here, and please don't take offense:

Are you proud that you are a fucking idiot?

 

[cytg111]

yep, double checked. still nothing

Technically true for the right now

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/01/roger-stone-indicted-trump-1444412

Lets see if whats up by nov 5th shall we? But looking at the cases and Stones anti social behavior, targetting a judge no less ... I mean if this guy walks your system is fucked.

 

[dphantom]

Honest question here, and please don't take offense:

Are you proud that you are a fucking idiot?

my only regret is you have set the bar so high I am not sure I can attain your level.

 

[Greenman]

I’m still waiting on those conviction numbers. I’ll give you a hint, it’s more than zero.

Not for Trump. That's specifically who I was talking about, and his convictions still stand at exactly zero. That said, it does appear that the dems are going to attempt to take action. I hope they do it, the process will be worthwhile even if it doesn't end up in a conviction.

 

[Paratus]

my only regret is you have set the bar so high I am not sure I can attain your level.

Not for Trump. That's specifically who I was talking about, and his convictions still stand at exactly zero. That said, it does appear that the dems are going to attempt to take action. I hope they do it, the process will be worthwhile even if it doesn't end up in a conviction.

Not convicted...yet.

Truly conservatives set the bar extremely high for their candidates.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Not for Trump. That's specifically who I was talking about, and his convictions still stand at exactly zero. That said, it does appear that the dems are going to attempt to take action. I hope they do it, the process will be worthwhile even if it doesn't end up in a conviction.

So there are convictions & you agree there are convictions correct?

 

[brandonbull]

How many convictions is it up to? Remind me please....

So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

Wrong, review the picture on post 30
Edit: apologies I misunderstood your carefully crafted statement

 

[Greenman]

So there are convictions & you agree there are convictions correct?

Of course. That's established fact. But my original comment was about Trump.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

When should I expect Barr to bring charges?

 

[Victorian Gray]

So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

Good puppy. Have a biscuit.

 

[cytg111]

And you're an idiot.

And you are blind.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

@brandonbull when should I expect Barr to file charges? Within 6 months or within a year?

 

[Fanatical Meat]

So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

Brandon, when should I expect Obama or the DNC to be charged from Barr?