Congrats,US, on your new nuclear powered cruise missile

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
38,409
8,700
136
Sometimes I watch the pre-election Maddow stuff for a laugh. Remember her big news on Trump's taxes?


Let's go down memory lane... no agenda here, just real, not fake, news:

SlowSpyder's is clearly a puppet account set up by Russian agents. There's no one person behind SlowSpyder's posts, it's a propaganda machine. Do not imagine that there's a person to which you are replying or whose posts you are reading.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cytg111

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,117
14,484
146
still zero

Yup. As you can see thanks to the sharpie I’ve got the proof the number is 0

maxresdefault.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: pete6032

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,136
30,086
146
Zero. The investigation found no evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia. They found a whole bunch of rats guilty of tax evasion and fraud, none of them were Trump.

10 counts of obstruction of justice, evidence thereof, by Trump, and most of it related to Russia.

Did you forget about those?
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,136
30,086
146
There you have it, not enough evidence.
It's also accurate to say there isn't enough evidence to convict you of murder.
We can mince words forever, but the bottom line is that they couldn't turn up any evidence. He wasn't impeached, even though the dems control the house.

again, that is not at all what happened. Plenty of evidence was detailed. It was never said that not enough to convict. Mueller said that he couldn't indict because his office is not allowed to. The evidence was very plainly laid out, in detail, for Congress to do its job.

I thought you were better with the reading than people like Slow?
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
20,941
5,564
136
I’m still waiting on those conviction numbers. I’ll give you a hint, it’s more than zero.
Not for Trump. That's specifically who I was talking about, and his convictions still stand at exactly zero. That said, it does appear that the dems are going to attempt to take action. I hope they do it, the process will be worthwhile even if it doesn't end up in a conviction.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,117
14,484
146
my only regret is you have set the bar so high I am not sure I can attain your level.
Not for Trump. That's specifically who I was talking about, and his convictions still stand at exactly zero. That said, it does appear that the dems are going to attempt to take action. I hope they do it, the process will be worthwhile even if it doesn't end up in a conviction.

Not convicted...yet.

Truly conservatives set the bar extremely high for their candidates.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,248
16,716
136
Not for Trump. That's specifically who I was talking about, and his convictions still stand at exactly zero. That said, it does appear that the dems are going to attempt to take action. I hope they do it, the process will be worthwhile even if it doesn't end up in a conviction.

So there are convictions & you agree there are convictions correct?
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,338
1,215
126
How many convictions is it up to? Remind me please....
So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,248
16,716
136
So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

Wrong, review the picture on post 30
Edit: apologies I misunderstood your carefully crafted statement
 
Last edited:
Feb 4, 2009
35,248
16,716
136
So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

When should I expect Barr to bring charges?
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

Good puppy. Have a biscuit.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,248
16,716
136
So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

@brandonbull when should I expect Barr to file charges? Within 6 months or within a year?
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,248
16,716
136
So far that number is zero for Russia election collusion/conspiracy/interference. That is going to change in the near future now that AG Barr and the DOJ are investigating the dirty dealings of Obama's admin and the DNC.

Brandon, when should I expect Obama or the DNC to be charged from Barr?