I'm troubled by all sorts of things. The FBI history is marred by the J. Edgar Era. He abused his power. He was working hand-in-hand with Nixon, who abused his own power. From this, the new Alt-Right spins stories that Roosevelt created the FBI to persecute his political enemies. But since the '70s, CIA has been reined in, and FBI has been operating within its intended limits. If you think that "renditions" and "waterboarding" were examples of "gross" CIA excess, you need to read up on the 200 or so assassination projects wedded to psy-war cover stories, the history of the Vietnam War, Operation Phoenix, narratives about persons-of-interest in the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Ted Shackley and the phony statistics being fed to McNamara, the post-assassination HONETOL molehunts, and finally the Church Committee hearings. These are still institutions we want to keep.
When Comey got the spotlight during the election, I was sure he had stepped in some poop, but the poop was created by the GOP congress with what was truly a witch-hunt against Clinton. I would think that a criminal investigation proceeds a step at a time according to its fruitfulness. If you keep making hypotheses about what you will find, and the search turns up empty, then at some point, you terminate it. I don't think Comey would deny this. I do think that FBI was under pressure from media and congress to pick scabs over e-mails.
Yet the Right keeps banging the drum that Clinton "committed crimes." And now, the Blond Lunatic is attempting to erode the institutional objectivity of an important federal agency. Revisiting the concept of an investigative search space, after all that's been produced since the first announcements about Russian meddling from our national security apparatus, I don't think there's anyone with both common sense and a love of Truth over partisan desire who wants to simply terminate the investigation as soon as possible.
What Comey has published in his book is exactly what I thought he was capable of saying. And -- I believe it.