Clinton blah blah blah email blah blah blah. One big boring blur. Now, nominating Trump, that's the opposite of boring.
Agreed, and well said. Nonetheless, one of these two horrible people WILL be our next President.How much more evidence do we need that the Clintons are dirty rats and she has no business being POTUS? The fact that she even has a chance at being elected points to a larger problem....the low ethics bar that Americans are willing to accept. We are to blame for people like her and Trump as the two choices for Pres.
Not enough people give a damn about our country anymore.![]()
Guccifer 2.0, another member of the vast right wing conspiracy after poor Hillary who is but a mere victim.
This is going to be the best presidential election of my lifetime! More historic firsts! The first female candidate and the first candidate under investigation by the FBI!
Um, those investigations were to gather information to give Hoover more leverage, not criminal investigations due to blatant criminal activity.You must be completely ignorant of the FBI investigations of political figures during Hoover's tenure. And long before and after, history repeats. Just drivel on.
Um, those investigations were to gather information to give Hoover more leverage, not criminal investigations due to blatant criminal activity.
Yep. A real choice.Man. Only if we had a 3rd party candidate to vote for instead of these 2 shit bricks....
People will tolerate corruption and sellouts as long as they get their FREE STUFFz.
The FBI investigates crimes, they are investigating your candidate. Do the math.What blatant criminal activity are you talking about?
Um, those investigations were to gather information to give Hoover more leverage, not criminal investigations due to blatant criminal activity.
The AP is reporting this today -
This version updates with State Department clarifying that security features on the department's computer system were disabled. An earlier version reported that the security features on Clinton's home server were disabled.
The emails, reviewed by The Associated Press, show that State Department technical staff disabled software on their systems intended to block phishing emails that could deliver dangerous viruses. They were trying urgently to resolve delivery problems with emails sent from Clinton's private server
If the activity is so blatant then why is it still just an investigation? Do you think charges are imminent?
My guess is that you will say if charges are filed against her it's because the evidence indicated it. If charges aren't filed against her it's evidence of corruption. Can you point to a set of circumstances where no charges are filed where you are willing to accept that you were wrong about the 'blatant criminal activity'?
It just keeps the false narrative in play.
I just find it funny that conservatives' trust in the FBI basically hinges on it giving them the result they want. It's not like conservatives have all the information at their fingertips to make an equivalently sound judgment and they don't seem to care. She's guilty in their minds already, now the only question is if the FBI is guilty too. Dictionary definition of motivated reasoning.
It would be a sliding scale.
1. FBI recommends indictment, Lynch refuses.
2. FBI doesn't recommend indictment.
1 would be much smellier than 2 and would be harder to explain as not being political.
You guys really don't think she did nothing wrong do you?
This IT stuff is too confusing to me. Can some experts weigh in, on the range of 1 to having Trump as our president, how bad of a clusterfvck is it?
The FBI investigates crimes, they are investigating your candidate. Do the math.
That's not math. It's more creative writing really.
Denial at its finest.That's not math. It's more creative writing really.
