• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Clinton foundation email release

G

Guurn

Senior member
"The Clinton Foundation swore off donations from foreign governments when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. That didn’t stop the foundation from raising millions of dollars from foreigners with connections to their home governments, a review of foundation disclosures shows. Some donors have direct ties to foreign governments. One is a member of the Saudi royal family. Another is a Ukrainian oligarch and former parliamentarian. Others are individuals with close connections to foreign governments that stem from their business activities." For those with a WSJ subscription.

This appears to be very bad assuming there is a criminal investigation going on...oh wait, there is.

One tidbit "Then-Senator Clinton helped shape the work of the Clinton foundation AND then recruited donors from the foundation as donors and bundlers for her presidential campaign…"

This should show who actually cares about crime and corruption and who is covering their ears and yelling lalalla.
 
Jhhnn said:
"Ties to foreign governments".... Is that like Saddam's links to Al Qaeda?
Click to expand...

Funny you bring this up. It clearly shows that she accepted "donations" directly from Saudi during her time as SoS, while she just so happened to also be approving weapons for them, and should be kept out of the oval office. What it will do; probably nothing. Her supporters do not care what she's done.
 
Guurn said:
Funny you bring this up. It clearly shows that she accepted "donations" directly from Saudi during her time as SoS, while she just so happened to also be approving weapons for them, and should be kept out of the oval office. What it will do; probably nothing. Her supporters do not care what she's done.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, the alternative is a Trump who on multiple occasions, made bribesdonations to attorney generals just before investigations of him for fraud were dropped.
(/this post made to demonstrate to certain P&N posters what they look like when they attempt to divert a thread to discussing things the other candidate did wrong.
 
Guurn said:
Funny you bring this up. It clearly shows that she accepted "donations" directly from Saudi during her time as SoS, while she just so happened to also be approving weapons for them, and should be kept out of the oval office. What it will do; probably nothing. Her supporters do not care what she's done.
Click to expand...

Can you quote the specific parts of the document that you are referring to?
 
Guurn said:
Funny you bring this up. It clearly shows that she accepted "donations" directly from Saudi during her time as SoS, while she just so happened to also be approving weapons for them, and should be kept out of the oval office. What it will do; probably nothing. Her supporters do not care what she's done.
Click to expand...
Hillary supporters are like, "if she can get away with it, then it is perfectly fine by them."
 
DrPizza said:
Unfortunately, the alternative is a person who on multiple occasions, made bribesdonations to attorney generals just before investigations of him for fraud were dropped.
Click to expand...
Would you like a person who buys influence or somebody who sells it as president?
 
Guurn said:
Did you read the first link? It mentions it in the second paragraph. I'll try to get more specific info later after some disc golf.
Click to expand...

I did, and the article does not say what you claimed. It says the foundation accepted donations from a member of the Saudi royal family, of which more than 10,000 people are a direct part of, most of whom have little to nothing to do with the Saudi government.

Again, if you want to look at the source yourself and look up exactly what you're trying to accuse her of I'd be happy to talk it over further. It seems like you've made a bunch of unsupportable statements.
 
Guccifer 2.0, another member of the vast right wing conspiracy after poor Hillary who is but a mere victim.

This is going to be the best presidential election of my lifetime! More historic firsts! The first female candidate and the first candidate under investigation by the FBI!
 
Guurn said:
Funny you bring this up. It clearly shows that she accepted "donations" directly from Saudi during her time as SoS, while she just so happened to also be approving weapons for them, and should be kept out of the oval office. What it will do; probably nothing. Her supporters do not care what she's done.
Click to expand...
The Clinton Family Foundation came clean months ago after investigations showed that they did not stop soliciting and accepting tens of millions in donations from foreign governments, corporations and powerful individuals. They revised their filings for her entire tenure as SecState to go from zero to tens of millions in such donations. (Note: This was purely a mistake, they caught it themselves, and they independently changed it. Hillary's promise to stop taking such funds actually meant to not stop taking such funds, and the investigation revealing that the foundation had not stopped taking such funds had nothing to do with this purely spontaneous orgy of refiling; it was purely coincidental. They all had drunk a lot of iced tea that day and were urinating when that story ran, so they didn't even see it.)

Obviously when President Obama demanded that she avoid "even the appearance" of corruption he meant ONLY the appearance of corruption, 'cause he's fine with it too.

As far as keeping her out of the Oval Office, that would be more compelling if the alternative was not Trump. (Or Cruz, or Rubio . . .)

Artdeco said:
Hillary could shoot Trump on live TV and still be elected in an orange prison jumpsuit.
Click to expand...
Well . . . At least she would have finally done something "for the people."

brycejones said:
Well she would color match Trump's corpse then.
Click to expand...
lol +1

Orange is the new dead.
 
*kjm said:
The foundation got hacked.... Shit hits the fan will the media report it???
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...ment-leaked-after-foundation-says-it-was-hack
Click to expand...

How much more evidence do we need that the Clintons are dirty rats and she has no business being POTUS? The fact that she even has a chance at being elected points to a larger problem....the low ethics bar that Americans are willing to accept. We are to blame for people like her and Trump as the two choices for Pres.

Not enough people give a damn about our country anymore. 🙁
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top