To some extent, you have to write off reeves as just another person whose interests are very personal. look at ted kennedy and his desire for healthcare reform. its not because ted gives two cents about you or me, but one of the kennedy's has had ongoing medical problems and so the royal family has a vested interest.
i agree with the post that says you can't compare reeves to mike fox. but then fox had a long time to adjust to his disease. when he shot one of his movies down here in florida, he was quite the party animal, more college kid than responsible philanthropist. but at that age, so were most of us. the thing about fox, is that he is more of an everyman, and so its more credible that he could care about those around him than reeves.
don't discount the hollywood effect on reeves too. i mean, its not everyday that someone plays a superhero at an early age. that stuff has gotta go to your head. his persona has been anything but an everyman, and one has to think that may be because he's never seen himself as such.
but in the end, it irks me as much as anyone that these celebrities try to hijack us with their special interests. if you want to start a foundation and try to solicit donations, fine. but don't be asking for my tax dollars.
thank you and have a nice day.