• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Christmas is White Supremacy in Action

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
FIVR said:
Quit being a whiny, pathetic victim and go back to school.
Click to expand...
Your language mechanics and grasp of grammatical application suggest that is a place that you have not frequented.😛 Furthermore, everybody in this country has the same chances of getting a higher education and those people need only apply themselves in school, make good grades so they can qualify for scholarships and other subsidies and assistance that are available to people with proven academics.

Stop making excuses for people who want to lay around all day getting something for nothing by complaining. Its always that particular segment of society that is rioting, looting and causing chaos using discrimination as the excuse to break the law. You need to stop drinking your own Kool-Aid.
 
Last edited:
Is there a middle ground between these camps? Personally I think the guiding principles behind BLM are extremely important and highlight the downstream effects of racial discrimination over long periods of time being institutionalized and culturally assimilated.

And I recognize that, while BLM is a movement rather than a hierarchical organization, we should still not support certain extreme positions and actions that have been attached to it. Can we not reject inane behavior without risking invalidation of the cause? Could I not say a position is wrong while agreeing with the motivation for it?
 
interchange said:
Is there a middle ground between these camps? Personally I think the guiding principles behind BLM are extremely important and highlight the downstream effects of racial discrimination over long periods of time being institutionalized and culturally assimilated.

And I recognize that, while BLM is a movement rather than a hierarchical organization, we should still not support certain extreme positions and actions that have been attached to it. Can we not reject inane behavior without risking invalidation of the cause? Could I not say a position is wrong while agreeing with the motivation for it?
Click to expand...

Those extreme positions came about because of the wanton acts commited towards that group of people.

White people get all uppity when the blm tells them they cant graze on land. Imagine how uppity they would be if rolls were actually reversed and whites were the lower caste.
 
JSt0rm said:
Those extreme positions came about because of the wanton acts commited towards that group of people.

White people get all uppity when the blm tells them they cant graze on land. Imagine how uppity they would be if rolls were actually reversed and whites were the lower caste.
Click to expand...

No caste system found.
 
JSt0rm said:
Those extreme positions came about because of the wanton acts commited towards that group of people.

White people get all uppity when the blm tells them they cant graze on land. Imagine how uppity they would be if rolls were actually reversed and whites were the lower caste.
Click to expand...

I think I can anticipate your position based on your posting history, but would you clarify your response to my post for me?
 
Blue_Max said:
I'm a little more concerned about every white 'progressive' out there who thinks that unless you're exposing your belly and helping "people of colour" (*gag*) gut your innards, then you're a 'white supremacist'.

...oh, but they don't have to die, themselves, if you're a leftie screaming for the deaths of OTHER whiteys. That makes them "righteous" and immune to the punishment all white people "deserve".

Fighting for the rights and equality they already have, claiming all the while that they don't.

Now THAT's insanity for you!
Click to expand...

Oh, you poor baby victim. You try so very hard to be the best victim that you can be and continually fail. So sad.
 
How the hell do you even get "victim" out of that... HOW??

Or is it just your usual strawman bullsh*t? He said X, but I'll claim he said Y so I can make fun of that! Yaaaaay! 😀
 
Blue_Max said:
How the hell do you even get "victim" out of that... HOW??

Or is it just your usual strawman bullsh*t? He said X, but I'll claim he said Y so I can make fun of that! Yaaaaay! 😀
Click to expand...

um you said we wanted to to expose your belly to be sacrificed. Thats a big victimness again from you. Always the victim.
 
JSt0rm said:
black people got pissed and arent giving a fuck about making sure white people dont feel threatened anymore.
Click to expand...

It's a shame. If I were a black person, I wonder how I'd be received by speaking up "Hey, maybe we should cool down a bit on sticking it to the man".

Probably worse than the white people who speak up saying "Hey, I'm not racist or anything but maybe those black folk should cool down a bit on sticking it to the man".
 
interchange said:
It's a shame. If I were a black person, I wonder how I'd be received by speaking up "Hey, maybe we should cool down a bit on sticking it to the man".

Probably worse than the white people who speak up saying "Hey, I'm not racist or anything but maybe those black folk should cool down a bit on sticking it to the man".
Click to expand...

Truly a difficult line to walk between uppity and ignored.
 
interchange said:
Same thing I asked jSt0rm. Please clarify.
Click to expand...

Seems our society doesn't lift much of a finger for disadvantaged minorities, like the ever-screwed natives, who don't get uppity enough. So the question is how uppity a somewhat unorganized group of angry people have to get for some action to be taken.
 
agent00f said:
Seems our society doesn't lift much of a finger for disadvantaged minorities, like the ever-screwed natives, who don't get uppity enough. So the question is how uppity a somewhat unorganized group of angry people have to get for some action to be taken.
Click to expand...

Seems like just uppity enough for people to dismiss a cause entirely should they choose without facing any challenge to their conscience.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top