sandorski
No Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,824
- 6,372
- 126
Want to bet $100 it doesn't?
Conspiracy to Ban through insufficient funds to Pay for Internet? :awe:
Want to bet $100 it doesn't?
Want to bet $100 it doesn't?
Holy shit...even NOW gets it!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20101029...hit_piece_condemned_across_political_spectrum
Gawker Anonymous Christine O'Donnell Hit Piece Condemned Across Political Spectrum
A piece published by the Internet gossip site Gawker that goes by the byline of "Anonymous" alleging a sordid, sort-of-sexual encounter with Delaware Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell has been condemned across the political spectrum.
O'Donnell has made a point of having "Christian conservative values," including chastity. Suspicions that the Gawker piece was bogus were raised not only because the author making the allegations is not named, but also with the revelations that he was paid for his alleged revelations.
The Gawker piece has been roundly condemned not only by the conservative blogosphere, but by groups that ordinarily do not come to the defense of conservative women politicians.
Katrina Trinko of National Review Online notes that NOW found the article beyond the pale:
"'Sexist, misogynist attacks against women have no place in the electoral process, regardless of a particular candidate's political ideology,' said NOW president Terry O'Neill in a statement.
"'NOW repudiates Gawker's decision to run this piece. It operates as public sexual harassment. And like all sexual harassment, it targets not only O'Donnell, but all women contemplating stepping into the public sphere,' O'Neill added. 'NOW/PAC has proudly endorsed women's rights champion Chris Coons, O'Donnell's opponent in the Delaware Senate race, and finds O'Donnell's political positions dangerous for women. That does not mean it's acceptable to use slut-shaming against her, or any woman.'"
NOW has, as far as anyone knows, never before come to the defense of a conservative female politician. This suggests that a line has been crossed that would not be crossed even by the most committed leftist. That fact should convey a little bit of comfort.
The Daily Caller notes that Chris Coons, who opposes Christine O'Donnell in the Delaware Senate race, has also condemned the article.
Allegations that conservative women politicians are engaged in sordid sexual behavior are nothing new. Nikki Haley, the Republican candidate for governor of South Carolina, was accused of having extra martial affairs. Despite that allegation, Haley won the primary and seems poised to win the general election.
It is unknown as of yet what if any effect the Gawker hit piece will have on the Delaware contest. The Daily Caller notes that a poll taken just before the Gawker hit piece was published showed that Christine O'Donnell had cut her deficit from 19 points to just 10. If there is a sudden sympathy vote surge, it may just be enough to carry O'Donnell over the top, making the Delaware Senate race the upset of the 2010 elections.
So how come no one condemns tabloids when they expose male politicians' sexual impropriety?
What part of this story involves 'impropriety' on O'Donnel's behalf??So how come no one condemns tabloids when they expose male politicians' sexual impropriety?
What part of this story involves 'impropriety' on O'Donnel's behalf??
O'Donnel is single and can sleep with as many people as she wishes.
http://gawker.com/5674353/i-had-a-one+night-stand-with-christine-odonnell
The rolfcopter is clear for take off
What part of this story involves 'impropriety' on O'Donnel's behalf??
O'Donnel is single and can sleep with as many people as she wishes.
According to the latest polls this is moving more votes to the O'Donnel column because it's pissing off women. The race could come down to the wire.
2-1 odds only. I'm tapped out after all my donations.
100 bucks to you if she loses
200 to me if she wins
bet or no bet?
You are so clueless that I'm speechless.Big question is: Is it the truth? If it is, well, too bad for her. If it's a Lie, then I would agree that it's inappropriate.
You are so clueless I'm speechless.
You are so clueless that I'm speechless.
The irony here is that your the one on the high horse and are too damn dense to realize it.Drowning man will catch at straws.
The irony of the far right defending her behaviour while being vehemently against such behaviour is astounding. People don't give a shit that she had a one night stand with some dude, it's the fact that she walks around touting chastity and all the other dogmatic nonsense that irks people.
Without her high horse, there wouldn't be a story.
The irony here is that your the one on the high horse and are too damn dense to realize it.
The irony here is that your the one on the high horse and are too damn dense to realize it.
Are you implying that truth is a character smear?
On what possible basis do you come to that conclusion? I never made any statement either way regarding her alleged hypocrisy as this has absolutely nothing to do with my point. Perhaps reading comprehension is not your strong suit....do I need to draw you a picture?That you're willing to dismiss her hypocrisy is yours....
2-1 odds only. I'm tapped out after all my donations.
If you're taped out then what difference does it make if it's 1 to 1 or 2 to 1? I guess you are losing confidence in her. Man she must really be bad, one whackjob losing confidence in another.
I take that as a no bet. That's all you had to say.
Find me a story about a single straight male who sex life became topic for debate during a political campaign.What I am clueless about is what exactly is the problem here? Srsly, Males are criticized for this type of thing all the time. Is it just because she's a woman?
John EdwardsFind me a story about a single straight male who sex life became topic for debate during a political campaign.
