Cheney Says He Favors Limbaugh Over Powell as Model Republican

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: Genx87
Limbaugh probably does represent the base right now. The republicans are tossed back onto their base. But they will have to change in order to grow out of the base and appeal to moderates. This has happened to both parties over the course of our history. I find it amusing people proclaiming the Republicans death. I believe there were times in the late 70s and 80s where republicans held less control in both houses. Jummy Carters first term the democrats held more seats and controlled the executive branch. That worked out well for them.

I don't understand why anyone would want a one party system at all. If they think theirs if benign, it certainly won't be once all effective restraints are gone.

Who knows, they see their ideology as superior and want to squash all dissenting voices? In 04 I was getting a bit worried republicans were getting too close to the super majority.

Luckily history has shown when one party holds all the power they typically get smacked back to reality. It is only a matter of time until the democrats go too far and the republicans figure out what they need to do and it will get back into some kind of balance.

This is probably a good time for the republicans to sit back and reformulate themselves over the next two election cycles. Democrats are putting the rope around their own necks as we speak and cant blame Republicans for anything that happens over this time period.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: smashp
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: smashp


Thats Interesting the last polls i Saw showed only 21% of the population identified themselves as republicans


lol, that's the huffington post for you....

If by Huffington post you really mean the Washington Post then Yes, as always you are correct and absolutely spot on

That's budmantom for you... owning himself on a daily basis.

Bud, stop already, your embarrasing yourself again... again... again...
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: loki8481
seriously, who actually cares what Cheney thinks?

The left. For being progessives they sure spend a lot of time in the past.

Limbaugh, Cheney and Palin.

2 of the 3 are irrelevant when it comes to future politics and the third is a talk show radio host who has no direct say over public policy.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: Atreus21
I so eagerly look forward to 2010.

I'm not sure why. The Dems have probably reached their peak number, although they might gain a seat or two.

The Reps are about as low as they are going to get. I don't see much change coming in a year unless something like a 9/11 happens, and even then that depends on how the Administration handles things.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: loki8481
seriously, who actually cares what Cheney thinks?

The left. For being progessives they sure spend a lot of time in the past.

Limbaugh, Cheney and Palin.

2 of the 3 are irrelevant when it comes to future politics and the third is a talk show radio host who has no direct say over public policy.

True...

but tell me. Who are the current leaders of the republican party? What are the plans going forward to make gains in the next few elections?
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: loki8481
seriously, who actually cares what Cheney thinks?

The left. For being progessives they sure spend a lot of time in the past.

Limbaugh, Cheney and Palin.

2 of the 3 are irrelevant when it comes to future politics and the third is a talk show radio host who has no direct say over public policy.

True...

but tell me. Who are the current leaders of the republican party? What are the plans going forward to make gains in the next few elections?

Still being figured out among the party. There is a struggle going on and debate on where the party should go. It will take time until it is figured out. Like I said it may not be until 2012 until the Republicans can distance themselves enough from Bush, get a solid plan in action, and the people in place to start a comeback.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: loki8481
seriously, who actually cares what Cheney thinks?

The left. For being progessives they sure spend a lot of time in the past.

Limbaugh, Cheney and Palin.

2 of the 3 are irrelevant when it comes to future politics and the third is a talk show radio host who has no direct say over public policy.

True...

but tell me. Who are the current leaders of the republican party? What are the plans going forward to make gains in the next few elections?

Still being figured out among the party. There is a struggle going on and debate on where the party should go. It will take time until it is figured out. Like I said it may not be until 2012 until the Republicans can distance themselves enough from Bush, get a solid plan in action, and the people in place to start a comeback.

Well I hope they get it right. The problem as I see it is that people like George Will who can make rational arguments are drowned out by Limbaugh and his supporters. The net result is that the loudest voice for Conservatism has been the one who tags people who question Iraq as being terrorists or some such nonsense, and being the party of support for AIG management. "Let them eat cake" isn't going over too well these days.

That gives people who aren't thrilled with government intervention to this degree no place to go except to the party of Rush. When the RNC has to apologize to that turd (I have no love for that one), you know they are in trouble.

The Republicans have to morph into a voice of reason, not a harangue against Obama or else they will never come back. I certainly have no intention of voting for either party as it stands.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
41,266
10,433
136
Cheney is a nut. Well, how could he endorse a Republican who endorsed the other party's candidate? Nevertheless, saying Rush is a model Republican makes him shark bait. Rush L is a media circus opportunist pure and simple.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Originally posted by: OCguy
If all that the left has to talk about is a former vice-president and a talk show host, I dont know what to tell you.

So how do you feel about Obama wanting DIJON MUSTARD on his burger?
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
As we saw in the 2008 election, the radical right does not even make a majority of the GOP itself, and has almost zero appeal outside of the GOP.

When Rush touted people like Fred Thompson in purely Republican primaries, the GOP electorate did not follow, and instead voted for candidates like McCain
and Huckabee.

Sadly, the GOP leadership itself were and still are more aligned with Cheney Limbaugh thinking than the GOP electorate itself. And when the GOP leadership is following the only the folks who make the most noise which is the radical right and lose sight of what Nixon called the silent majority, that kind of disconnect is going to be a big problem come election time. What the GOP needs may be a charismatic moderate who can bring the right wing along, because that badly burned by GWB, the more moderate GOP electorate is not going to fall for another GWB type running from the far right.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Originally posted by: OCguy
If all that the left has to talk about is a former vice-president and a talk show host, I dont know what to tell you.
You forgot Joe the Plumber and all of Sarah Palin's relatives. We have a host of intellectual giants here at ATPN.
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: OCguy
If all that the left has to talk about is a former vice-president and a talk show host, I dont know what to tell you.
You forgot Joe the Plumber and all of Sarah Palin's relatives. We have a host of intellectual giants here at ATPN.

He said ...

as Bristol Palin re-introduces herself to America as an Ambassador of Abstinence.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: loki8481
seriously, who actually cares what Cheney thinks?

The left. For being progessives they sure spend a lot of time in the past.

Limbaugh, Cheney and Palin.

2 of the 3 are irrelevant when it comes to future politics and the third is a talk show radio host who has no direct say over public policy.

True...

but tell me. Who are the current leaders of the republican party? What are the plans going forward to make gains in the next few elections?

Still being figured out among the party. There is a struggle going on and debate on where the party should go. It will take time until it is figured out. Like I said it may not be until 2012 until the Republicans can distance themselves enough from Bush, get a solid plan in action, and the people in place to start a comeback.

Struggle? Civil war maybe. The issue is between the social conservatives vs. the intelligent people like Meghan McCain. The social conservatives themselves are far too small of a group to stand on their own and win national elections. The intelligent people are having a difficult time dealing with the social nimrods who still have a strong following in the rep party. Good luck. Ya, its sure as hell not happening in 2010.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: OCguy
If all that the left has to talk about is a former vice-president and a talk show host, I dont know what to tell you.
You forgot Joe the Plumber and all of Sarah Palin's relatives. We have a host of intellectual giants here at ATPN.

He said ...

as Bristol Palin re-introduces herself to America as an Ambassador of Abstinence.
Case in point.
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: OCguy
If all that the left has to talk about is a former vice-president and a talk show host, I dont know what to tell you.
You forgot Joe the Plumber and all of Sarah Palin's relatives. We have a host of intellectual giants here at ATPN.

He said ...

as Bristol Palin re-introduces herself to America as an Ambassador of Abstinence.
Case in point.

Back at yah, Forrest ...
 

BMW540I6speed

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2005
1,055
0
0
Cheney's shorter message: "Go Fuck Yourselves". For all the hand-wringing and gnashing of teeth about such antique concepts as "Justice" and "Respect for the Law" and "Equal Application of the Law". Cheney truly is in a bubble, insulated by his own megalomania that makes Nixon seem downright charming.

It's amazing to watch this clown spout his own talking points. If todays Republicans/Conservatives think, in their wildest dreams, that the nation is going back to 1950 they truly need to have their mental health examined, quickly.

The political and global relationship landscape is far too complicated to be reduced to platitudes that can be passed out or emailed every morning. If the todaya Republicans/conservatives believe otherwise, they are truly more naive than is obvious.

Cheney's continued presence on the scene after the devastation is astonishing. In his world, embarrassment is for others. His continuence of proping up Rush Limbaugh to the spotlight is NOT going to bring back disenfranchised Republicans. I and many of my former Republican supporters are steaming mad that this idiot will not shut the fuck up. The party is already wandering the wilderness and this guy keeps spouting off deeper and deeper.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
social conservatives vs. the intelligent people

Just looking around I'd say not many fit in the latter category. Take those who like to stereotype for example.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
THANKS Republican voters... Hearing this from Cheney makes me very sad that America has so many mindless sheep...

Rush "I go to sex slave countries with Viagra and abuse hillbilly heroin" Limbaugh IS MORE RESPECTABLE TO THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE USA THAN A DECORATED WAR VETERAN who "had" more integrity than the whole Bush Cabinet combined.. *before he was abused by them


there is a very miserable place in hell for people like Cheney and those who voted for him

I really am almost in/fighting back tears right now... you citizens of america who side with Cheney make are a disgrace to this nation


Colin Powell
Military medals and ribbons
Bronze oak leaf cluster
Bronze oak leaf cluster
Bronze oak leaf cluster
Defense Distinguished Service Medal (with 3 Oak Leaf Clusters)
Bronze oak leaf cluster
Distinguished Service Medal, Army (with Oak Leaf Cluster)
Defense Superior Service Medal
Bronze oak leaf cluster
Legion of Merit (with Oak Leaf Cluster)
Soldier's Medal
Bronze Star
Purple Heart
Air Medal
Joint Service Commendation Medal
Bronze oak leaf cluster
Bronze oak leaf cluster
Army Commendation Medal (with 2 Oak Leaf Clusters)
Presidential Medal of Freedom (order of precedence, if worn)
Presidential Citizens Medal (order of precedence, if worn)
Bronze service star
National Defense Service Medal (with 1 Bronze Service Star)
Silver service star
Vietnam Service Medal (with 1 Silver Service Star)
Army Service Ribbon
Army Overseas Service Ribbon (with numeral 3)

Dick Cheney
By the time he turned 26 in January 1967 and was no longer eligible for the draft, he had asked for and received five deferments, four because he was a student and one for being a new father.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
dahunan you need to look at things in terms of political ideology. Rush and Cheney dovetail on most issues. Cheney and Powell never have. Regardless of the personal backgrounds of Rush and Cheney, they view things very differently as far as the direction the nation ought to go. That's why Cheney would prefer Rush. He meets Cheney's personal standard for what is "right" (as in correct) and Powell does not.

While I don't agree with Cheney about Rush, I understand why he would need to pick him over Powell. Powell wasn't supportive of Cheney's actions, and Cheney views that as being wrongheaded.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
dahunan you need to look at things in terms of political ideology. Rush and Cheney dovetail on most issues. Cheney and Powell never have. Regardless of the personal backgrounds of Rush and Cheney, they view things very differently as far as the direction the nation ought to go. That's why Cheney would prefer Rush. He meets Cheney's personal standard for what is "right" (as in correct) and Powell does not.

While I don't agree with Cheney about Rush, I understand why he would need to pick him over Powell. Powell wasn't supportive of Cheney's actions, and Cheney views that as being wrongheaded.

And I view Cheney as one of Satan's Minions.. *If Satan exists.. he pays Cheney a nice check

Look at who Rush is.. where are the missing Viagra

Rush is a mind control object for lazy Americans who would have been Hitler youth with the greatest of ease.. Cheney wants people to say "Yes Massa" .. that is all..

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/cheney/

 

BMW540I6speed

Golden Member
Aug 26, 2005
1,055
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: loki8481
seriously, who actually cares what Cheney thinks?

The left. For being progessives they sure spend a lot of time in the past.

Limbaugh, Cheney and Palin.

2 of the 3 are irrelevant when it comes to future politics and the third is a talk show radio host who has no direct say over public policy.

Come on man, you usually have a more pragmatic and balanced view on things than this.

All i hear is why does "the Left" care what talk radio and people like Cheney have to say?.

And to insinuate that this "left" group is the only segment of the political landscape to "spend a lot of time in the past" on a political message board or in direct conversation is silly. The "left" & the "right" look into history. I hear, "but, but Clinton", I hear "but, but Carter" etc. constantly. this is not a revelation.

I don't know what people are looking at or talking to but there are many pissed off former registered Republicans, independents, moderates who care what these people are saying and doing. It is not just the "left" listening. Anybody who believes that is deluded or in denial. Many want a viable Republican party to form. Many former registered Republicans hope to see an electorate look seriously at these millionare "entertainers" and the bullshit they are peddleing to solidify their ratings. These "millionare entertainers" are convinceing these people to vote againsts their self interest and claim to be for the "common" man, when there is NOTHING common about them. They would not let these listeners set foot in there living rooms.

Sorry, Former Republicans, moderetes, independents ARE important to the party. Not just these "true" conservsatives some think the party should seek out. Does the party leaders really think that future generations are going to be more conserative (particularly on social issues) than their parents?

From Steele's own words last week, the don't want moderates back if we happen to not be Pro-Life. They don't seem to friendly to the idea of some form of a Green Republican. They don't seem to want anyone that doesn't support laws to prevent Gay marriage. I don't think they really want the Rockefeller or Roosevelt Republicans back on our terms. They want us to vote for their flawed platform without thought. Is this a viable strategy to get disaffected Republicans, moderates & independents back to the GOP?

Now we have to listen to fucktards like Cheney propping up Rush Limbaugh as a model Republican, and demonizing sombody like Powell, someone actually who gets it?.

Those supposed "true" 21st Conservitives better get the purely ridiculous notion that only this ficticious fucking group they keep spouting about, aka, the "left" are the only people listening. I guess the "left" constitutes everybody who is not a registered Republican, you know about 22% of the population right now. That is a completly laughable notion.

Dump the religious right wingers and let them fend for themselves, move the party back to a fiscal conservative stance with a more centrist position on many social issues. Basically they need to do what Clinton did to them in the 90's...steal the Dem's thunder on some of the key issues and make people think they are Republican issues and programs. Make a clear distinction between Dems and Pubs on FISCAL issues, not on a bunch of bullshit quasi-religious issues where nothing can or will be done. Disassociate themselves from the majority of the right wing core issues (abortion, gay marriage, stem cell research, prayer in schools, flag burning, etc etc) and take either moderate or neutral stances on those issues.

So the "we" that constitutes the heart of the GOP is well to the right, and any moderates are merely tolerated or actively "coddled". Got it. So the answer would be no, moderates are not welcomed but actively discouraged. What are going to be the next groups to be excommunicated in the cause of purity? Nothing much is going to change as long as that is the dominant attitude there. You'll need a new generation of mature leaders to emerge who aren't tied to the litmus tests or the utter irresponsibility of the last 8 years. That won't be overnight, either.

 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
dahunan you need to look at things in terms of political ideology. Rush and Cheney dovetail on most issues. Cheney and Powell never have. Regardless of the personal backgrounds of Rush and Cheney, they view things very differently as far as the direction the nation ought to go. That's why Cheney would prefer Rush. He meets Cheney's personal standard for what is "right" (as in correct) and Powell does not.

While I don't agree with Cheney about Rush, I understand why he would need to pick him over Powell. Powell wasn't supportive of Cheney's actions, and Cheney views that as being wrongheaded.

And I view Cheney as one of Satan's Minions.. *If Satan exists.. he pays Cheney a nice check

Look at who Rush is.. where are the missing Viagra

Rush is a mind control object for lazy Americans who would have been Hitler youth with the greatest of ease.. Cheney wants people to say "Yes Massa" .. that is all..

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/cheney/

So why all the angst?

The little boy was walking down a path and he came across a rattlesnake. The rattlesnake was getting old. He asked, "Please little boy, can you take me to the top of the mountain? I hope to see the sunset one last time before I die." The little boy answered "No Mr. Rattlesnake. If I pick you up, you'll bite me and I'll die." The rattlesnake said, "No, I promise. I won't bite you. Just please take me up to the mountain." The little boy thought about it and finally picked up that rattlesnake and took it close to his chest and carried it up to the top of the mountain.

They sat there and watched the sunset together. It was so beautiful. Then after sunset the rattlesnake turned to the little boy and asked, "Can I go home now? I am tired, and I am old." The little boy picked up the rattlesnake and again took it to his chest and held it tightly and safely. He came all the way down the mountain holding the snake carefully and took it to his home to give him some food and a place to sleep. The next day the rattlesnake turned to the boy and asked, "Please little boy, will you take me back to my home now? It is time for me to leave this world, and I would like to be at my home now."

The little boy felt he had been safe all this time and the snake had kept his word, so he would take it home as asked. He carefully picked up the snake, took it close to his chest, and carried him back to the woods, to his home to die. Just before he laid the rattlesnake down, the rattlesnake turned and bit him in the chest. The little boy cried out and threw the snake upon the ground. "Mr. Snake, why did you do that? Now I will surely die!" The rattlesnake looked up at him and grinned, "You knew what I was when you picked me up."

Cheney is going to keep doing this and it's probably better of people recognize and let him pass into the obscurity he deserves rather than bringing him back to the limelight.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
^^^ Because

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke

Cheney has more followers than Bush..
20 million? people listen to Rush everyday?
in 2004 elections potentially 1/3rd of the Bush voters were also Limbaugh listeners

Cheney has done more harm to this great nation than Osama himself