mikeymikec
Lifer
- May 19, 2011
- 20,698
- 15,743
- 136
You are right. Most of this is indistinguishable but his children don't deserve any hate. They are young malleable kids that lost their dad because someone didn't have the balls to confront him. Here we are. 2 kids with no dad.. He was an asshole. He didn't deserve to die for his views. Here we are today trying to justify a death of someone we don't agree with. We need to be better . Just beecuse you are republican doesnt make your vote less valued.
I respect every vote cast in
Nobody dehumanized Kirk they just quoted him. If his words were acceptable for others why are they not acceptable for him?
You believe the crap he spewed is true and beautiful. Crap like this:
View attachment 129989
America is so fucked.
People here who are normalizing and celebrating the death of a 31 year old father of a 1 and 3 year old whose occupation was to do open debates with college students, all for the crime of disagreeing with them on social and political issues are the current scourge of society and the reason this has happened.
my point which you seem to be deliberately missing is that nobody who is progressive or a believer in human rights has any reason to stoop to trump, or charlies levels.
" The country is better off with Kirk dead"
if you really think this person was so bad, why do you think its okay someone murdered him? Or maybe you don't and are antagonizing, but people are happy he is dead in this thread thats already fact. But, he's never killed anyone right? He was just an innocent, albeit ignorant, human.
I really think that before people break out the hagiography for him that they should throughly review what he stood for. Turning disapproval of the crime in to legitimacy for his actions, opinions, and words is a huge mistake.
The guy very clearly had no problems with political violence. It’s darkly amusing how conservatives are clutching their pearls that some liberals are reacting to Charlie Kirk’s death the way Charlie Kirk reacted to others.
As you alluded to this is because we are fundamentally asked to treat conservatives like children with no agency.
Coming from the biggest name calling racist on this forum. Nazi much? When somebody states "FAFO" they are pretty much condoning the act.
conservatives don't like consequences. this is why they try to rewrite history, which is filled with generations of people experiencing the consequences of their ghoulish actions. Pretend it never happened, you get to keep doing it and act surprised and offended when the very predictable consequences show up at your door.
Seriously: try reading for once in your life. Try understanding how humanity works. You might be a happier person if you don't have to spend your life constantly offended by people that just want to be nice to everyone and not bother anyone else. It's strange how those two things are impossible for you people, but you should consider trying it.
That's why every accusation is a confession. They can't imagine a world where people would have different internal motivations to do X compared to themselves. They saw their pundits like Charlie Kirk advocating for hate and political violence and think that their political opponents revel in the thought of instead getting a bullet into Mr Kirk first, which is about as far away from reality as you can possibly get.It is in no small part amusing how conservatives have gotten everything they want and more and are still incandescently angry all the time. There is no such thing as happiness for these people, only the hunger to revel in fresh cruelties and depravity.
We know the next steps of this story, and we know how it ends.
For all we know it could have also been this character:
View attachment 129994
View attachment 129995
Or anyone of the other thousands who would consistently throw death threats at him and his family.
That you had to cherrypick from an entire social network when anyone could also just make an equivalent montage out of this very own thread speaks volumes.
The southern Democrats are angry that they lost a war 150 years ago and can't own slaves anymore, so they shot a Republican yesterday?
lol the most milquetoast of critique
As a mostly centrist agnostic, I disagreed with most of his social, political and theological positions. He also did have some positions I found abhorrent (e.g. public executions, Ukraine).
Still thought the guy had balls to go expose himself on overwhelmingly liberal college campuses to just talk to people. And I really think his method of simply debating everyone who came up to him was formidable and should be replicated by all sides because discourse is the best way for us to empathize with each other, and at least understand the other side.
Unfortunately, too many people who were always going to be too incompetent, ignorant or dumb to ever win him at the fair game of public debate thought it was a good idea to choose violence (as we're seeing in this ghastly thread). And one of those people went through with it, with all the other cowards cheering on this.
Problem is them thinking this level of political violence is only one way, and they're probably about to find out it isn't.
Using what you describe as "underhanded tactics" is worse than murdering people in front of their kids?Because they don't want to go that low. That's the difference between normal people and radicalized brainwashed people.
I'm not assuming anything. I'm saying it's more likely that he got killed by the group of people who repeatedly said they wanted him dead through social media posts (like some of the ones we're seeing in this thread) and/or would regularly send him death threats, than this being the work of a vengeful husband whose wife cheated on him with Charlie Kirk.You are making an assumption that fits your own beliefs. We don't know the shooter or their motivations.
This is false.The fact is that more often than not assassins have motives and beliefs that are almost totally incoherent anyway if they are not legitimately mentally ill.
Dude... who the hell spends their day on a tech forum like Anandtech to exclusively make >100k posts spewing hate on a political sub?blah blah blah
Seriously deranged thinking.
It is odd that you seem angrier at other people acting like Charlie Kirk than you were at Charlie Kirk for acting like Charlie Kirk.Using what you describe as "underhanded tactics" is worse than murdering people in front of their kids?
I'm not assuming anything. I'm saying it's more likely that he got killed by the group of people who repeatedly said they wanted him dead through social media posts (like some of the ones we're seeing in this thread) and/or would regularly send him death threats, than this being the work of a vengeful husband whose wife cheated on him with Charlie Kirk.
This is false.
Dude... who the hell spends their day on a tech forum like Anandtech to exclusively make >100k posts spewing hate on a political sub?
I "bring a pen to a hammer fight"? No, dude. I'm trying to reason with people who aren't retarded, have a life and are capable of living in a society.
Which is why I just blocked you.
Anyone have an actual video of Kirk debating someone?
All I see are trolling and misdirection.
I'm not assuming anything. I'm saying it's more likely that he got killed by the group of people who repeatedly said they wanted him dead through social media posts (like some of the ones we're seeing in this thread) and/or would regularly send him death threats, than this being the work of a vengeful husband whose wife cheated on him with Charlie Kirk.
This is false.
Using what you describe as "underhanded tactics" is worse than murdering people in front of their kids?
I'm not assuming anything. I'm saying it's more likely that he got killed by the group of people who repeatedly said they wanted him dead through social media posts (like some of the ones we're seeing in this thread) and/or would regularly send him death threats, than this being the work of a vengeful husband whose wife cheated on him with Charlie Kirk.
This is false.
Dude... who the hell spends their day on a tech forum like Anandtech to exclusively make >100k posts spewing hate on a political sub?
I "bring a pen to a hammer fight"? No, dude. I'm trying to reason with people who aren't retarded, have a life and are capable of living in a society.
Which is why I just blocked you.