nanette1985
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2005
- 4,209
- 2
- 0
Cars is evidently popular with the fanatical car collector set (friend is a fanatical car collector, collects Isetta's). I understand that the attention to detail is much admired.
3 year old really liked it b/c would have said he loved it if they just brought out Lightning and Mater and had them drive around for an hour doing silly things.
So he's seen Mater's Tall Tales
![]()
No, he has not...but I appreciate the info. Now he can watch something different for a change.
Low 60s thus far from RT and Metacritic. Worth noting the first Cars got low 70s.
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/cars-2
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cars_2/
Interesting. I liked Cars 1, especially considering how many just hated it.
This may be Pixar's very first critical flop? (It'll be a fuckton commercial success for sure).
Although I liked the first Cars it is a blatant ripoff of the movie, Doc Hollywood.
Low 60s thus far from RT and Metacritic. Worth noting the first Cars got low 70s.
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/cars-2
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/cars_2/
It's actually called Cars Toons - Mater's Tall Tales..
![]()
it's actually pretty cool... definitely a good tradeoff for watching CARS all the time.
I agree. I found those to be quite enjoyable.
I agree. I found those to be quite enjoyable.
I say they've already accomplished that with Toy Story 3.
I can think of zero unplanned sequels which were even good, much less better than a good first effort.
Someone start naming names (to shoot down).
TS2>TS
It almost seems with Pixar movies it doesn't matter what the "critics" say, people will flock to them anyway. still worth the money if you have a kid (especially a boy) in the targeted age range.
I can think of zero unplanned sequels which were even good, much less better than a good first effort.
Someone start naming names (to shoot down).
