Originally posted by: CycloWizard
If you tax this 'disposable income' so highly, people will simply not work to earn it. Money is the motivator that makes people strive for bigger and better things. Why should I go to work when I know that Bill Gates will float me and my entire extended family for the rest of our lives? I can drop out of high school to retire at the age of 16 and never look back.Originally posted by: Insomniak
All I'm saying is that there's a livable minimum standard that one has to meet, and after that, disposable income is just that.
Originally posted by: Insomniak
Disclaimers:
I am NOT saying the wealthy should pay a 75% tax.
I am NOT saying the wealthy should pay more taxes.
I'm not saying a flat tax would be fair.
Originally posted by: Orsorum
How is competition based on hate?
Originally posted by: Stunt
I'd like moonbeam to answer how we are going to go extinct...and what exactly i am not seeing.
You cannot enlighten with vague references that mean nothing.
Originally posted by: RobCur
http://www.endymion.ukf.net/capitalism.html
I don't to be rich or anything like that, I'd just want everyone to have an equal chance at life. You are either born poor or born rich just like the good old days
The rich do not pay any taxes as far as I know since they are the one collecting taxes
We work only to pay off debt that should never had been if we never agree to it but most people are clueless and don't see anything wrong with that.
In short it is slavery for the masses. bankers have many ways of tricking us into oweing them money that is just like taking candy from a child without them noticing.
No matter what we do, money controls us more then we control our life.
Those who are too lazy to click, here is a direct quote:
Cap'italism n 1. A system by which the few profit from the exploitation of the many. 2. A mindset addicted to profit, work and debt which values money more than life. 3. An unsustainable ideology obsessed by growth despite our finite plante. 4. The cause of the global, social and ecological crisis. 5. A social system overthrown at the end of the 20th century.......
last, I am sick and tired of being controlled by money. It does not bring happiness for most of us, sometime I wish not to spend any if at all other times I just wish people would value life, happiness more then money.
more money does not mean more happiness, it means you have to work harder to get more often losing all of it at a later time.
-tl-zm)
n.
An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development is proportionate to the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.
Originally posted by: Infohawk
First of all you can reject money, but you will be an outcast and socializing will be difficult. Not everyone worships money-- but most americans for practical purposes do.
And while I'm a fan of free markets, I do think all children should start out with equal chances. Estate taxes should be 100% and everyone should have similar access to same education. Right now, we have a quasi-aristocratic system, which the founders tried to rid us of with the estate tax.
Outdated natural law arguments in favor of capitalism in 10...9...
Originally posted by: her209
The end state of capitalism is when one person has everything and the rest have nothing.
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Infohawk
And while I'm a fan of free markets, I do think all children should start out with equal chances. Estate taxes should be 100% and everyone should have similar access to same education. Right now, we have a quasi-aristocratic system, which the founders tried to rid us of with the estate tax.
How are you going to make sure every child starts out "equally" (never mind even defining that very ambiguous term)? Smart kids will still have an advantage over dumb kids, strong kids over weak kids, handsome/beautiful kids over ugly kids, etc. It's near impossible to create the perfect 'level' playing field.
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: her209
The end state of capitalism is when one person has everything and the rest have nothing.
More baseless Marxist horsesh!t.
One person couldn't end up with everything under capitalism because of something called division of labor and comparative advantage.
a few end up with a lot and the rest end up with horsesht
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: her209
The end state of capitalism is when one person has everything and the rest have nothing.
More baseless Marxist horsesh!t.
One person couldn't end up with everything under capitalism because of something called division of labor and comparative advantage.
a few end up with a lot and the rest end up with horsesht
I agree, under state capitalism. You are confusing the current environment with true capitalism. Today's economic environment includes an enormous number of protections, and subsidies from the government. This has created an unnatural accumulation of wealth in the upper class. Businessmen hate true capitalism the most, because they do not like being subjected to extreme competition. Get rid of the government protection racket, and their empires will fall.
An excellent example of this is gambling. It is very difficult to get into the gambling market because the government regulates it so heavily. Hence, the few lucky winners of gambling rights, such as Indian tribes cash in big time. Eliminate the government-sponsored racket and their empire falls. Especially with gambling, which would have a very low entry barrier without the government regulations.
and how exactly do you plan on abolishing government? Sometimes its good to have a practical theory, although hopeless idealism is good too. I'm certain guilty of that one.
Originally posted by: Stunt
Actually Dissipate does want to abolish government.
Don't put words in his mouth, not fair for us or him.
I like moonbeam. He does give good insight typically, and has proven himself to be very intelligent.Originally posted by: StormRider
Originally posted by: Stunt
I'd like moonbeam to answer how we are going to go extinct...and what exactly i am not seeing.
You cannot enlighten with vague references that mean nothing.
That's the way he always has talked. I am of the opinion that either:
1) He is the only one that sees and understands the true world and that is why I cannot understand him.
2) He has taken too many drugs.
Originally posted by: Stunt
Actually Dissipate does want to abolish government.
Don't put words in his mouth, not fair for us or him.
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: Stunt
Actually Dissipate does want to abolish government.
Don't put words in his mouth, not fair for us or him.
++ - DMA you might not be talking about abolishing government, but DIssipate's arguments are based on exactly that as the appropriate outcome.
Originally posted by: Stunt
What is it supposed to do?
Doesn't that vary with the individual?
It does change with the individual. The majority of canadians/europeans feel that it is up to government to provide universally available healthcare. The scandinavian countries believe in free post-secondary education, large welfare funding. You believe in public education and security, Dissipate does not.Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Originally posted by: Stunt
What is it supposed to do?
Doesn't that vary with the individual?
What the government is supposed to do? No, it doesn't. The government exists to protect us from enemies foreign and domestic, to provide basic services like Courts, police, firefighters and a public education system (though how you do Education without the corruption we have now, I couldn't tell ya) to ensure that a basic level of intellectual competence and REASONING ability is achieved. All this extra Social crap is extraneous, EXPENSIVE feel-good fluff that the government has no business doing.
Anyway, more later, I'm heading home and then to Fry's!
Jason
Originally posted by: Stunt
I like moonbeam. He does give good insight typically, and has proven himself to be very intelligent.Originally posted by: StormRider
Originally posted by: Stunt
I'd like moonbeam to answer how we are going to go extinct...and what exactly i am not seeing.
You cannot enlighten with vague references that mean nothing.
That's the way he always has talked. I am of the opinion that either:
1) He is the only one that sees and understands the true world and that is why I cannot understand him.
2) He has taken too many drugs.
Getting him to give examples or explain specifics is not an easy task, but at the same time i do not feel he fits into either of those categories.
Sorry, i've never seen star wars...i actually get a lot of flak for that...engineer who hasn't seen star wars, or star trek...heheOriginally posted by: StormRider
Moonbeam is our Yoda.....
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Originally posted by: RobCur
http://www.endymion.ukf.net/capitalism.html
I don't to be rich or anything like that, I'd just want everyone to have an equal chance at life. You are either born poor or born rich just like the good old days
The rich do not pay any taxes as far as I know since they are the one collecting taxes
We work only to pay off debt that should never had been if we never agree to it but most people are clueless and don't see anything wrong with that.
In short it is slavery for the masses. bankers have many ways of tricking us into oweing them money that is just like taking candy from a child without them noticing.
No matter what we do, money controls us more then we control our life.
Those who are too lazy to click, here is a direct quote:
Cap'italism n 1. A system by which the few profit from the exploitation of the many. 2. A mindset addicted to profit, work and debt which values money more than life. 3. An unsustainable ideology obsessed by growth despite our finite plante. 4. The cause of the global, social and ecological crisis. 5. A social system overthrown at the end of the 20th century.......
last, I am sick and tired of being controlled by money. It does not bring happiness for most of us, sometime I wish not to spend any if at all other times I just wish people would value life, happiness more then money.
more money does not mean more happiness, it means you have to work harder to get more often losing all of it at a later time.
You know, if you visit a PROPAGANDA website you are GUARANTEED to get a skewed definition of *any* word at all. If you want a DEFINITION of Capitalism from an UNBIASED source, visit Dictionary.com for the CORRECT definition.
-tl-zm)
n.
An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development is proportionate to the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.
Capitalism begins with a basic assumption: Each individual is the OWNER of his or her own life, and by extension the OWNER of the products of his or her labor and efforts. This means that it assumes each man has a NATURAL RIGHT to his own life and his own work, which in turn means that no one can legitimately TAKE his life or his property.
To own something means that you have the right to decide how to use and/or dispose of that thing. Therefore Capitalism ONLY works based on the idea that men must VOLUNTARILY choose to deal with one another, in whatever capacity.
Man's nature is such that he must act for his own *BENEFIT*, not his own destruction (assuming he behaves like a Human Being, ie, he behaves *Rationally*). Now put those two concepts together: Man chooses for himself based on his own best interests; two men choose to deal, each seeking his or her own best interests and both recognizing that any exchange of VALUES must be voluntary. As a consequence, rational men dealing with one another will bargain to find the ground in which BOTH their needs are met as well as possible, and then reach their agreement VOLUNTARILY based on that principle.
"What about men who use force or coercion?" you ask! Such men cannot be deemed Rational men and Capitalism has no power to control such men. It's one of the reasons we implement Governments among men: to restrain those who would use Force (of which Coercion is a part) to illegitimately sacrifice others for their own benefit.
Your assertion that "the Rich don't pay taxes as they're the ones collecting taxes" is fundamentally flawed and incredibly absurd. The Rich pay more than NINETY PERCENT (90%!!) of the taxes in the United States, even though they represent less than SIX percent of the population. In addition, "the Rich" don't collect taxes. When was the last time you wrote a TAX check to Bill Gates or Arnold Schwarzenegger or Sandra Bullock? The GOVERNMENT collects taxes (am I insane or shouldn't anyone with a PULSE know that?)
Your decription of CREDIT also has no merit and no basis in fact. You assert that it is SLAVERY for a man to work to pay what he owes? If I choose to take out a loan to buy a $4,000 HDTV set am I a SLAVE when I pay the bill? Or would you assert that I should have just been *given* the TV for free? If so, whose responsibility is it to provide me that TV?
I think you need to do A little READING, a little MORE reading, and then top it off with some good, old fashioned Adam Smith and call it a night.
Try to THINK a bit before going off half-cocked spewing Communist Propaganda, which holds no basis in fact, nor in history.
Ask yourself for a moment why you would trust the proponents of a system that systematically slaughtered 100 million innocents in the twentieth century, CURRENTLY enslaves thousands and continues to OPPRESS a *BILLION* people to this very day.
If you have a few dollars to spare, donate to the Victims of Communism memorial fund. You're a good example of what happens when we FORGET what the true face of Evil really looks like.
Jason
