• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Capitalism is evil

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
I'd like moonbeam to answer how we are going to go extinct...and what exactly i am not seeing.
You cannot enlighten with vague references that mean nothing.
 

Insomniak

Banned
Sep 11, 2003
4,836
0
0
Why the hell doesn't anyone ever read?


Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: Insomniak
All I'm saying is that there's a livable minimum standard that one has to meet, and after that, disposable income is just that.
If you tax this 'disposable income' so highly, people will simply not work to earn it. Money is the motivator that makes people strive for bigger and better things. Why should I go to work when I know that Bill Gates will float me and my entire extended family for the rest of our lives? I can drop out of high school to retire at the age of 16 and never look back.


Originally posted by: Insomniak
Disclaimers:
I am NOT saying the wealthy should pay a 75% tax.
I am NOT saying the wealthy should pay more taxes.
I'm not saying a flat tax would be fair.
 

StormRider

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2000
8,324
2
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
I'd like moonbeam to answer how we are going to go extinct...and what exactly i am not seeing.
You cannot enlighten with vague references that mean nothing.

That's the way he always has talked. I am of the opinion that either:

1) He is the only one that sees and understands the true world and that is why I cannot understand him.

2) He has taken too many drugs.
 

nergee

Senior member
Jan 25, 2000
843
0
0
"Capitalism is based on competition and competition is based on hate."

There are those that will hate you and they will not win..unless you hate them back.
Then you destroy yourself.........Richard M. Nixon.................
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: RobCur
http://www.endymion.ukf.net/capitalism.html

I don't to be rich or anything like that, I'd just want everyone to have an equal chance at life. You are either born poor or born rich just like the good old days
The rich do not pay any taxes as far as I know since they are the one collecting taxes
We work only to pay off debt that should never had been if we never agree to it but most people are clueless and don't see anything wrong with that.
In short it is slavery for the masses. bankers have many ways of tricking us into oweing them money that is just like taking candy from a child without them noticing.
No matter what we do, money controls us more then we control our life.

Those who are too lazy to click, here is a direct quote:
Cap'italism n 1. A system by which the few profit from the exploitation of the many. 2. A mindset addicted to profit, work and debt which values money more than life. 3. An unsustainable ideology obsessed by growth despite our finite plante. 4. The cause of the global, social and ecological crisis. 5. A social system overthrown at the end of the 20th century.......

last, I am sick and tired of being controlled by money. It does not bring happiness for most of us, sometime I wish not to spend any if at all other times I just wish people would value life, happiness more then money.
more money does not mean more happiness, it means you have to work harder to get more often losing all of it at a later time.

You know, if you visit a PROPAGANDA website you are GUARANTEED to get a skewed definition of *any* word at all. If you want a DEFINITION of Capitalism from an UNBIASED source, visit Dictionary.com for the CORRECT definition.

-tl-zm)
n.

An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development is proportionate to the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.

Capitalism begins with a basic assumption: Each individual is the OWNER of his or her own life, and by extension the OWNER of the products of his or her labor and efforts. This means that it assumes each man has a NATURAL RIGHT to his own life and his own work, which in turn means that no one can legitimately TAKE his life or his property.

To own something means that you have the right to decide how to use and/or dispose of that thing. Therefore Capitalism ONLY works based on the idea that men must VOLUNTARILY choose to deal with one another, in whatever capacity.

Man's nature is such that he must act for his own *BENEFIT*, not his own destruction (assuming he behaves like a Human Being, ie, he behaves *Rationally*). Now put those two concepts together: Man chooses for himself based on his own best interests; two men choose to deal, each seeking his or her own best interests and both recognizing that any exchange of VALUES must be voluntary. As a consequence, rational men dealing with one another will bargain to find the ground in which BOTH their needs are met as well as possible, and then reach their agreement VOLUNTARILY based on that principle.

"What about men who use force or coercion?" you ask! Such men cannot be deemed Rational men and Capitalism has no power to control such men. It's one of the reasons we implement Governments among men: to restrain those who would use Force (of which Coercion is a part) to illegitimately sacrifice others for their own benefit.

Your assertion that "the Rich don't pay taxes as they're the ones collecting taxes" is fundamentally flawed and incredibly absurd. The Rich pay more than NINETY PERCENT (90%!!) of the taxes in the United States, even though they represent less than SIX percent of the population. In addition, "the Rich" don't collect taxes. When was the last time you wrote a TAX check to Bill Gates or Arnold Schwarzenegger or Sandra Bullock? The GOVERNMENT collects taxes (am I insane or shouldn't anyone with a PULSE know that?)

Your decription of CREDIT also has no merit and no basis in fact. You assert that it is SLAVERY for a man to work to pay what he owes? If I choose to take out a loan to buy a $4,000 HDTV set am I a SLAVE when I pay the bill? Or would you assert that I should have just been *given* the TV for free? If so, whose responsibility is it to provide me that TV?

I think you need to do A little READING, a little MORE reading, and then top it off with some good, old fashioned Adam Smith and call it a night.

Try to THINK a bit before going off half-cocked spewing Communist Propaganda, which holds no basis in fact, nor in history.

Ask yourself for a moment why you would trust the proponents of a system that systematically slaughtered 100 million innocents in the twentieth century, CURRENTLY enslaves thousands and continues to OPPRESS a *BILLION* people to this very day.

If you have a few dollars to spare, donate to the Victims of Communism memorial fund. You're a good example of what happens when we FORGET what the true face of Evil really looks like.

Jason
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: Infohawk
First of all you can reject money, but you will be an outcast and socializing will be difficult. Not everyone worships money-- but most americans for practical purposes do.

And while I'm a fan of free markets, I do think all children should start out with equal chances. Estate taxes should be 100% and everyone should have similar access to same education. Right now, we have a quasi-aristocratic system, which the founders tried to rid us of with the estate tax.

Outdated natural law arguments in favor of capitalism in 10...9...

Natural Law arguments are outdated, are they? Has Natural Law suddenly been upended?

Jason
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: her209
The end state of capitalism is when one person has everything and the rest have nothing.

That is the most absurd statement I have ever heard. Capitalism DOESN'T HAVE an "End State". NATURE doesn't have an "End State" and your argument is silly and ignorant at best. Capitalism isn't even a system *devised* by man, it's a natural phenomenon that just *occurred* as a CONSEQUENCE of political, civil and economic LIBERTY. Nobody sat down and said "OK, here's Capitalism, and it's got to follow these ten specific rules!" or anything of the sort.

What rampant absurdity we have on this board!

Jason
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: Infohawk
And while I'm a fan of free markets, I do think all children should start out with equal chances. Estate taxes should be 100% and everyone should have similar access to same education. Right now, we have a quasi-aristocratic system, which the founders tried to rid us of with the estate tax.

How are you going to make sure every child starts out "equally" (never mind even defining that very ambiguous term)? Smart kids will still have an advantage over dumb kids, strong kids over weak kids, handsome/beautiful kids over ugly kids, etc. It's near impossible to create the perfect 'level' playing field.

It's not "near impossible" it IS impossible. The nature of the universe itself is SO complex and entails SO many variables that no person nor group of persons could *ever* account for all of them, much less *control* them. All these "centralized management" schemes are ridiculous, based on the false premise that its possible to CONTROL the entirety of mankind in all its nearly infinite complexity.

Arrogance and ignorance alone would even *consider* to seek for such authority.

Jason
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: her209
The end state of capitalism is when one person has everything and the rest have nothing.

More baseless Marxist horsesh!t.

One person couldn't end up with everything under capitalism because of something called division of labor and comparative advantage.

a few end up with a lot and the rest end up with horsesht

No, actually ALL end up with NOTHING. We ALL die, rich and poor alike, and the wealth we've accumulated is distributed again in many kinds of ways.

There is NO SUCH THING as an "End State" for nature or for Capitalism.

Jason
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Originally posted by: her209
The end state of capitalism is when one person has everything and the rest have nothing.

More baseless Marxist horsesh!t.

One person couldn't end up with everything under capitalism because of something called division of labor and comparative advantage.

a few end up with a lot and the rest end up with horsesht

I agree, under state capitalism. You are confusing the current environment with true capitalism. Today's economic environment includes an enormous number of protections, and subsidies from the government. This has created an unnatural accumulation of wealth in the upper class. Businessmen hate true capitalism the most, because they do not like being subjected to extreme competition. Get rid of the government protection racket, and their empires will fall.

An excellent example of this is gambling. It is very difficult to get into the gambling market because the government regulates it so heavily. Hence, the few lucky winners of gambling rights, such as Indian tribes cash in big time. Eliminate the government-sponsored racket and their empire falls. Especially with gambling, which would have a very low entry barrier without the government regulations.

and how exactly do you plan on abolishing government? Sometimes its good to have a practical theory, although hopeless idealism is good too. I'm certain guilty of that one.

He's not talking about abolishing government, he's talking about a simple premise: The government has certain LEGITIMATE functions, and the MANAGEMENT of the ECONOMY is *NOT* one of them.

Jason
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Actually Dissipate does want to abolish government.
Don't put words in his mouth, not fair for us or him.
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: Stunt
Actually Dissipate does want to abolish government.
Don't put words in his mouth, not fair for us or him.

++ - DMA you might not be talking about abolishing government, but DIssipate's arguments are based on exactly that as the appropriate outcome.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: StormRider
Originally posted by: Stunt
I'd like moonbeam to answer how we are going to go extinct...and what exactly i am not seeing.
You cannot enlighten with vague references that mean nothing.

That's the way he always has talked. I am of the opinion that either:

1) He is the only one that sees and understands the true world and that is why I cannot understand him.

2) He has taken too many drugs.
I like moonbeam. He does give good insight typically, and has proven himself to be very intelligent.
Getting him to give examples or explain specifics is not an easy task, but at the same time i do not feel he fits into either of those categories.
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
Actually Dissipate does want to abolish government.
Don't put words in his mouth, not fair for us or him.

Well, maybe he does, but I haven't seen him say that, nor did he say so in that particular post :) I can only reply in the context of what I see, obviously :)

Jason
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: Stunt
Actually Dissipate does want to abolish government.
Don't put words in his mouth, not fair for us or him.

++ - DMA you might not be talking about abolishing government, but DIssipate's arguments are based on exactly that as the appropriate outcome.

Okie doke! *I* wouldn't abolish government, I just want it to do what it's SUPPOSED to do and butt out of the rest, LOL :)

Jason
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
What is it supposed to do?
Doesn't that vary with the individual?
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
What is it supposed to do?
Doesn't that vary with the individual?

What the government is supposed to do? No, it doesn't. The government exists to protect us from enemies foreign and domestic, to provide basic services like Courts, police, firefighters and a public education system (though how you do Education without the corruption we have now, I couldn't tell ya) to ensure that a basic level of intellectual competence and REASONING ability is achieved. All this extra Social crap is extraneous, EXPENSIVE feel-good fluff that the government has no business doing.

Anyway, more later, I'm heading home and then to Fry's!

Jason
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Originally posted by: Stunt
What is it supposed to do?
Doesn't that vary with the individual?

What the government is supposed to do? No, it doesn't. The government exists to protect us from enemies foreign and domestic, to provide basic services like Courts, police, firefighters and a public education system (though how you do Education without the corruption we have now, I couldn't tell ya) to ensure that a basic level of intellectual competence and REASONING ability is achieved. All this extra Social crap is extraneous, EXPENSIVE feel-good fluff that the government has no business doing.

Anyway, more later, I'm heading home and then to Fry's!

Jason
It does change with the individual. The majority of canadians/europeans feel that it is up to government to provide universally available healthcare. The scandinavian countries believe in free post-secondary education, large welfare funding. You believe in public education and security, Dissipate does not.

There is a huge spectrum, you are assuming that your beliefs are the way it should be and your opinion on how government should operate is the only correct way.
You are ignorant to think this.
 

StormRider

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2000
8,324
2
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: StormRider
Originally posted by: Stunt
I'd like moonbeam to answer how we are going to go extinct...and what exactly i am not seeing.
You cannot enlighten with vague references that mean nothing.

That's the way he always has talked. I am of the opinion that either:

1) He is the only one that sees and understands the true world and that is why I cannot understand him.

2) He has taken too many drugs.
I like moonbeam. He does give good insight typically, and has proven himself to be very intelligent.
Getting him to give examples or explain specifics is not an easy task, but at the same time i do not feel he fits into either of those categories.


Moonbeam is our Yoda.....
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: StormRider
Moonbeam is our Yoda.....
Sorry, i've never seen star wars...i actually get a lot of flak for that...engineer who hasn't seen star wars, or star trek...hehe
 

onlyCOpunk

Platinum Member
May 25, 2003
2,532
1
0
Without Capitalism, what would motivate people to succeed? But then again business school has forced me to accept and love capitalism.
 

Albatross

Platinum Member
Jul 17, 2001
2,344
8
81
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Originally posted by: RobCur
http://www.endymion.ukf.net/capitalism.html

I don't to be rich or anything like that, I'd just want everyone to have an equal chance at life. You are either born poor or born rich just like the good old days
The rich do not pay any taxes as far as I know since they are the one collecting taxes
We work only to pay off debt that should never had been if we never agree to it but most people are clueless and don't see anything wrong with that.
In short it is slavery for the masses. bankers have many ways of tricking us into oweing them money that is just like taking candy from a child without them noticing.
No matter what we do, money controls us more then we control our life.

Those who are too lazy to click, here is a direct quote:
Cap'italism n 1. A system by which the few profit from the exploitation of the many. 2. A mindset addicted to profit, work and debt which values money more than life. 3. An unsustainable ideology obsessed by growth despite our finite plante. 4. The cause of the global, social and ecological crisis. 5. A social system overthrown at the end of the 20th century.......

last, I am sick and tired of being controlled by money. It does not bring happiness for most of us, sometime I wish not to spend any if at all other times I just wish people would value life, happiness more then money.
more money does not mean more happiness, it means you have to work harder to get more often losing all of it at a later time.

You know, if you visit a PROPAGANDA website you are GUARANTEED to get a skewed definition of *any* word at all. If you want a DEFINITION of Capitalism from an UNBIASED source, visit Dictionary.com for the CORRECT definition.

-tl-zm)
n.

An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development is proportionate to the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.

Capitalism begins with a basic assumption: Each individual is the OWNER of his or her own life, and by extension the OWNER of the products of his or her labor and efforts. This means that it assumes each man has a NATURAL RIGHT to his own life and his own work, which in turn means that no one can legitimately TAKE his life or his property.

To own something means that you have the right to decide how to use and/or dispose of that thing. Therefore Capitalism ONLY works based on the idea that men must VOLUNTARILY choose to deal with one another, in whatever capacity.

Man's nature is such that he must act for his own *BENEFIT*, not his own destruction (assuming he behaves like a Human Being, ie, he behaves *Rationally*). Now put those two concepts together: Man chooses for himself based on his own best interests; two men choose to deal, each seeking his or her own best interests and both recognizing that any exchange of VALUES must be voluntary. As a consequence, rational men dealing with one another will bargain to find the ground in which BOTH their needs are met as well as possible, and then reach their agreement VOLUNTARILY based on that principle.

"What about men who use force or coercion?" you ask! Such men cannot be deemed Rational men and Capitalism has no power to control such men. It's one of the reasons we implement Governments among men: to restrain those who would use Force (of which Coercion is a part) to illegitimately sacrifice others for their own benefit.

Your assertion that "the Rich don't pay taxes as they're the ones collecting taxes" is fundamentally flawed and incredibly absurd. The Rich pay more than NINETY PERCENT (90%!!) of the taxes in the United States, even though they represent less than SIX percent of the population. In addition, "the Rich" don't collect taxes. When was the last time you wrote a TAX check to Bill Gates or Arnold Schwarzenegger or Sandra Bullock? The GOVERNMENT collects taxes (am I insane or shouldn't anyone with a PULSE know that?)

Your decription of CREDIT also has no merit and no basis in fact. You assert that it is SLAVERY for a man to work to pay what he owes? If I choose to take out a loan to buy a $4,000 HDTV set am I a SLAVE when I pay the bill? Or would you assert that I should have just been *given* the TV for free? If so, whose responsibility is it to provide me that TV?

I think you need to do A little READING, a little MORE reading, and then top it off with some good, old fashioned Adam Smith and call it a night.

Try to THINK a bit before going off half-cocked spewing Communist Propaganda, which holds no basis in fact, nor in history.

Ask yourself for a moment why you would trust the proponents of a system that systematically slaughtered 100 million innocents in the twentieth century, CURRENTLY enslaves thousands and continues to OPPRESS a *BILLION* people to this very day.

If you have a few dollars to spare, donate to the Victims of Communism memorial fund. You're a good example of what happens when we FORGET what the true face of Evil really looks like.

Jason

i think that site is www.victimsofcommunism.org
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,752
6,766
126
Knowledge is not something you can give away to people who have no preparation for it. Self knowledge and self understanding, the awareness of the origins of how we feel can only be had by people who learn to experience what it is they feel.

People are asleep in that they not only do not even know what they feel, much less why.
The reason for this is obviously that what we feel is self hate, the feeling that we are the worst in the world. We don't allow ourselves to feel this because we feel it is true. Who wants to feel that. But it is a lie and you can only know that via the actual remembering of the experience in which you bought that lie.

What inner knowledge also teaches is how one seeks to experience ones self have vicariously. One falls in love and then sabotages the relationship to relive rejection without remembering the real thing. There are thousands of variations on this. We get to feel rage and hate vicariously without remembering when it was we first felt these things. We need constantly to spin down to some disaster to feel alive. That is why we will go extinct. We need to get close to death to get near the life that is dead inside us, to walk in backward to our corpse. We will destroy the world rather than remember how we really feel because by destroying the world we hope and pray we will feel. We cannot allow ourselves to feel but without feeling there is no life. So we substitute rage and muted sorrow for relived experience.

Knowledge is paradox.
 

Abraxas

Golden Member
Oct 26, 2004
1,056
0
0
DMA, tell me, how is it that on the one hand you lambast someone for using a slanted and biased site to define capitalism and then turn to a site like www.victimsofcommunism.org to give the history of communism?