• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Canadians don't respect the 2nd Amendment

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Incorruptible said:
Did you even try to use proper grammar? Next time ensure proper grammar before you attack the 2nd Amendment and the rights of Americans.
Click to expand...

what does the 2nd amendment have to do with an American bringing a gun on to Canadian soil?

I'll give you a hint. absolutely nothing.

oh yeah, almost forgot:

welcome back

5335972460_64898b8137_z.jpg
 
Victorian Gray said:
Did you notice what the picture was of?

Did you notice who I was replying to with that picture?
Click to expand...

Yep, I noticed that not only in this thread but others you are doing a wonderful job of following the intent of that book.......trolling. Too bad you most likely don't see your trolling as being wrong.
 
Londo_Jowo said:
Yep, I noticed that not only in this thread but others you are doing a wonderful job of following the intent of that book.......trolling. Too bad you most likely don't see your trolling as being wrong.
Click to expand...

Antagonizing mouth-breathers with 'facts' and 'logic' and 'science' is not trolling. At worst it's child abuse based on mental age.
 
Londo_Jowo said:
Yep, I noticed that not only in this thread but others you are doing a wonderful job of following the intent of that book.......trolling. Too bad you most likely don't see your trolling as being wrong.
Click to expand...

Take your damn medication...

He was pointing out the obvious-ness of Inconceivables trolling attempt.

Because no fuck wit could honestly believe that the 2nd Amendment applies to, or in, Canada.

Should he have searched for a "better" image that spoke poor man's English so that you could more easily understand it?

Show us on the doll where the Queen touched you...
 
Londo_Jowo said:
Yep, I noticed that not only in this thread but others you are doing a wonderful job of following the intent of that book.......trolling. Too bad you most likely don't see your trolling as being wrong.
Click to expand...

I'm curious, what posts of mine do you consider trolling and why?

Posting that to Incorruptible? Asking a certain question of the racialist? The toaster comments to nehalem? Yeah, I could possibly be accused of mildly trolling people who are full on, hardcore trollers who wouldn't participate in an honest discussion/debate if their lives depended on it. Other than that?
 
Victorian Gray said:
I'm curious, what posts of mine do you consider trolling and why?

Posting that to Incorruptible? Asking a certain question of the racialist? The toaster comments to nehalem? Yeah, I could possibly be accused of mildly trolling people who are full on, hardcore trollers who wouldn't participate in an honest discussion/debate if their lives depended on it. Other than that?
Click to expand...

Sounds like you have the same, 'It's not worth bothering with them' list as I do.

Toaster weddings, for the win.
 
Iron Woode said:
Canada is a great country. I hope some of the posters in this thread will come up here for a visit sometime.
Click to expand...

how is thunder bay?

and when i said canada is a shitty country i was refering to the corruption and politics of the governement which are pretty bad but pretty much america and australia and such are just as bad if not worse. south africa is supposed to be particulary bad. wonder what the new zealand government is like? although most of the articles on that have been about kim dot com and spying.

and i know the federal canadian government is not infested like quebec is but there are still a fair amount of corruption and bigotry. makes me think about how corrupt mccain may have been compared to obama. mitt romney would have been particulary bad probably worse than obama.
 
rudeguy said:
No. An unloaded gun in a compartment not accessible to the driver is covered under freedom of movement. I cannot be stopped from LEGALLY transporting my gun from a state where its legal to another state where its legal. So you have incoherently rambled on, yet did not take the time to look at the facts of the case? When I travel, the first thing I do is check local gun laws. If this guy didn't do that, then he is not a responsible gun owner. He needs to be charged with as many felonies as possible so he can never own or posses a gun again.
Click to expand...

most of this argueing started with the canadian government not the guy trying to bring a gun over the border. why did he have a loaded gun. self defense seems to be the only possible reason. no need to load a gun to smuggle it.
 
Victorian Gray said:
So what happened? Did a Canadian kick your puppy when you were a little kid? You've obviously got some kind of axe to grind here.
Click to expand...

i must have thrown a fit over the word dependency then. did the queen drop on your head when you were small? or throw a fit about natives. yeah natives have some pretty petty shit that goes on. but people are still racist to them.
 
Victorian Gray said:
I'm curious, what posts of mine do you consider trolling and why?

Posting that to Incorruptible? Asking a certain question of the racialist? The toaster comments to nehalem? Yeah, I could possibly be accused of mildly trolling people who are full on, hardcore trollers who wouldn't participate in an honest discussion/debate if their lives depended on it. Other than that?
Click to expand...

I'm quite sure you know when you're trolling. Chances are the other person will eithrr ignore the attempt or come back with a troll attempt of their own none of which adds to the subject of the thread. Then again this thread was destined to be a troll thread based on the title.
 
etrigan420 said:
Take your damn medication...

He was pointing out the obvious-ness of Inconceivables trolling attempt.

Because no fuck wit could honestly believe that the 2nd Amendment applies to, or in, Canada.

Should he have searched for a "better" image that spoke poor man's English so that you could more easily understand it?

Show us on the doll where the Queen touched you...
Click to expand...

Wow, someone is quite butthurt. Maybe you should lay off the alcohol.
 
Londo_Jowo said:
I'm quite sure you know when you're trolling. Chances are the other person will eithrr ignore the attempt or come back with a troll attempt of their own none of which adds to the subject of the thread. Then again this thread was destined to be a troll thread based on the title.
Click to expand...

LOL!..what are you the trolling police...dude, this forum on its face is one big troll fest. Your not imune...
 
brycejones said:
Canada has the same amendments as the US? Do you expect Canada to abide by the US Constitution?
Click to expand...

When did I ever say that? The OP is very anti-gun so I called him out for attacking the 2nd Amendment.

MomentsofSanity said:
You answered nothing. He violated Canadian law and lied at the border about being armed with a concealed weapon. The Constitution is irrelevant as he was in another country.

I ask again. Why should he be immune from prosecution for lying about having a concealed weapon? Don't parrot the same statement. Actually address the points.
Click to expand...

3 Years is way too much and if they try for it then it's possible the US government will intervene. The guy shouldn't be charged, he was clearly not a threat and is a former soldier. The OP is using this one guy to attack gun owners.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top