- Mar 4, 2011
- 11,395
- 1,189
- 126
It would be instant± assuming the stick isn't flexible or compressible.
Also that can't be right. If I poke the star with a morse code. I just communicated to someone 2.5 light years away in an instant.
It would be instant± assuming the stick isn't flexible or compressible.
No it wouldn't. First, it it would, I believe it would violate relativity in that we could use such a device to send a signal faster than the speed of light. Bringing relativity into it, all sorts of fun things happen. I'm thinking/wondering if length contraction doesn't happen as a result.
It would touch it at the speed you moved your arm, but you wouldn't see it for 2.5 years.
We're already violating every physical law we can find, why should relativity be any different?
So yeah, you can dial a phone on Alpha Centurai. Just need your super stick.
Let's not forget able to withstand the surface temperature of a star.Yes, but there's no such thing as a perfectly incompressible or inflexible material. So this has nothing to do with physics, it's just an arbitrary thought exercise.
So yes, if you had a 2.5 LY stick that was massless, incompressible, and inflexible, and it was pointed at a star and the end was 5 inches from that star, and you pushed the end of the stick the plane takes off.
Let's not forget able to withstand the surface temperature of a star.
No it wouldn't. First, it it would, I believe it would violate relativity in that we could use such a device to send a signal faster than the speed of light. Bringing relativity into it, all sorts of fun things happen. I'm thinking/wondering if length contraction doesn't happen as a result.
It seems like you're asking how quickly the movement will propogate through the stick. You don't need a 2.5 light year or even 8 light minute stick to test that.
Keep in mind that the stick will be made of molecules composed of atoms that are mostly empty space. So when you push the stick you are simply pushing atoms close to other atoms and then those atoms are repelled by physical forces, that's how the movement propogates.
I'm not smart enough to argue, but where did the stick go? If you pushed it 5" and it didn't bend or compress, where is it?
I'm not smart enough to argue, but where did the stick go? If you pushed it 5" and it didn't bend or compress, where is it?
Right, so it's not instant.
The stick would 'lag' until the movement reaches the other end. So is the stick actually contracting? (kind of like when you whip a garden hose) What if it's made of diamond?
I'm not smart enough to argue, but where did the stick go? If you pushed it 5" and it didn't bend or compress, where is it?
I think contract is the wrong word, I think it would compress.
Why is diamond (carbon) special? It follows the same physical laws everything else does.
My dumb way to think of a material that doesn't compress or expand.
So in any given time, the stick is shorter than its actual length when you apply a force.
"It is fully testable"
LEL
I am. U MAD BRO?In few thousand years? Why not. Are you predicting what we're capable and not capable of in few thousand years? You must be the genius of mankind's history.
Same time as it took my arm to extend forward (few seconds)?
If so, did that stick just travel much faster than speed of light?
