waggy
No Lifer
It is clear you know nothing about the situation in Chicago, absolutely nothing.
actually he is right. they confiscate everything they see legal or not. trouble is yes there are a bunch of illegal guns in chicago.
It is clear you know nothing about the situation in Chicago, absolutely nothing.
actually he is right. they confiscate everything they see legal or not. trouble is yes there are a bunch of illegal guns in chicago.
Again, where is your evidence that the ACLU is providing political protection to gangs? Your link doesn't provide any evidence for your ridiculous claim. Back up your claim.
So once again you've displayed your lack of credibility to the world. Don't you ever feel the least bit embarrassed by the crap you type?If you don't think that the ACLU is a political actor in Chicago you're naive. Plenty of information in my link.
If you think the ACLU is protecting gangs based on that link than you have no idea how to read.If you don't think that the ACLU is a political actor in Chicago you're naive. Plenty of information in my link.
Just ban guns with more than 7 round magazines and close the gun show loophole. Problem solved![]()
But doesnt chicago have some of the strictest gun laws in the country? I thought it made sense to make lawful people unable to own guns?
So once again you've displayed your lack of credibility to the world. Don't you ever feel the least bit embarrassed by the crap you type?
All guns are banned in Chicago
Per capta numbers are the only real way to look at the problem. The total number is inconsequential. Of course the total is what gets played up in the media because it makes an emotional impact.
Landrieu says that the murder epidemic in New Orleans is largely confined to African-American men between the ages of 16 and 30, both victims and perpetrators. Murder is the leading cause of death for that demographic group, he said.
Good point. I hope they get it and all that untrained-in-policing that comes along with it just so we can use them as an example.
Of course this is ridiculous and won't happen. Chance of it happening is exactly and precisely 0%.
This has never been true and is not now. Handguns were banned until the recent SC decision.
Chicago requires that all firearms be registered with the police department. Gun owners are required to have a Chicago Firearm Permit. The city has banned the possession of certain semi-automatic firearms that it defines as assault weapons, as well as magazines that can hold more than 12 rounds of ammunition. Chicago residents must "immediately" report a firearm that is stolen or lost, and must report the transfer of a firearm at least 48 hours in advance. Chicago also prohibits the sale of firearms within city limits.
Cook County has banned the possession of certain semi-automatic firearms that it has defined as assault weapons, and magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. Starting in August 2013, residents must report to the county sheriff within 48 hours any firearms that are stolen, lost, transferred, or sold. The sheriff may share this information with other law enforcement agencies. In Cook County, local laws, such as those of Chicago, take precedence over county laws that regulate similar matters.
My mistake. That's what I get for basing assumptions on what the news/media reports. I was watching Nightline or some other news program reporting the excessive murders in Chicago and how many were by firearms, and they made a statement about guns being banned in the city. I assumed they meant all guns.In Chicago, gun owners are required to have a Chicago Firearm Permit, which costs $100 and must be renewed every three years. Before getting the permit, the resident must complete a training course that includes at least four hours of classroom training and one hour of range time. Each gun must be registered with the Chicago Police Department at a one-time cost of $15 per gun, and an annual registration report must be filed every year. Gun possession is permitted only inside a dwelling, not in a garage or on the outside grounds of the property. Only one gun at a time may be kept in a usable state. Chicago's ordinances are being challenged in court, with plaintiffs alleging that they are so restrictive and burdensome as to interfere with citizens' Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
My mistake. That's what I get for basing assumptions on what the news/media reports. I was watching Nightline or some other news program reporting the excessive murders in Chicago and how many were by firearms, and they made a statement about guns being banned in the city. I assumed they meant all guns.
It's a common misconception. Gun ownership is restrictive here but by no means illegal and there are several challenges pending against the new requirements, personally I consider them onerous. They are largely pointless anyway since it has no appreciable effect on crime rates.
I wish you had to jump through those same hoops to vote.
It is clear you know nothing about the situation in Chicago, absolutely nothing.
I was responding to your distorted and false point about Katrina. Of which it was law enforcement who went around confiscating firearms from citizens after the hurricane hit. After which you than had the crooks in the same police department go around looting private property and murdering innocent people. Meanwhile gangs of thugs were ran rampant in the area and they also targeted unarmed citizens and their property.

All guns are banned in Chicago (might be all of Cook county?)
This is the problem. None of the law abiding citizens are allowed to arm themselves, but there are still thousands of unregistered and illegal firearms in the hands of criminals/gang members. That is why the police are "outgunned", because they have little recourse to track/find these weapons and get them off the streets.
My mistake. That's what I get for basing assumptions on what the news/media reports. I was watching Nightline or some other news program reporting the excessive murders in Chicago and how many were by firearms, and they made a statement about guns being banned in the city. I assumed they meant all guns.
It's a common misconception. Gun ownership is restrictive here but by no means illegal and there are several challenges pending against the new requirements, personally I consider them onerous. They are largely pointless anyway since it has no appreciable effect on crime rates.
Another one that doesn't know what the hell they are posting about.
Heh the people of Chicago will have the ultimate police state they desire. Full with AFVs on every corner and troops going on patrol. And finally, we will have invaded one of our own cities. Wonder if we can secure it as well as one of those dumps in the ME?
Per capta numbers are the only real way to look at the problem. The total number is inconsequential. Of course the total is what gets played up in the media because it makes an emotional impact.