CA state worker retired and cashed out with 810k in unused comp and vacation time!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
This guys is exaclty whats wrong with government. No small business owner can afford to pay its workers an 800 thousand retirement bonus. They'd go bankrupt. Oops, isn't California bankrupt already?
 

theevilsharpie

Platinum Member
Nov 2, 2009
2,322
14
81
It doesn't happen in private companies. There are hard caps in the system so that when someone reaches it, vacation time stops accumulating.

The same goes for California corporations and governments. Even so, a highly-paid individual (e.g. $250,000) could walk away with a substantial sum on termination if he or she is maxed on vacation and comp time.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
The same goes for California corporations and governments. Even so, a highly-paid individual (e.g. $250,000) could walk away with a substantial sum on termination if he or she is maxed on vacation and comp time.

Not really that high. Plenty of college professors and state professionals make over 200K. Hell some prison guards do with OT. Totally unsustainable as Tax payers are disappearing and/or getting wage cuts themselves.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Looks like the managers F'ed up by allowing them to over accrue vacation time.

The managers should be fired, train to ensure the 80 day limit is adhered to, and move on.

First of all he won't be fired. You can't fire state employees willy nilly. Which get's to the the heart of this matter and that is the Public vs Private pay and benefit gap which is large. This growing differential between public and private sector compensation and benefits will be addressed, mathmatically it has to be as private sector workers take continual hits.

Looming public pension deficits in almost every state and municipality will not be addressed by tax increases while everyone elses own retirement prospects circle the drain and they get wage cuts, trust me on that.
 

theevilsharpie

Platinum Member
Nov 2, 2009
2,322
14
81
Actually I believe that California's constitution also mandates that it cannot default on its default. I live in CA and I fully expect at somepoint that taxes are going up.

Heh. If California's government doesn't have enough money to pay their bills, they'll be in default no matter what the constitution says.

What is a creditor going to do, sue? :awe:
 

StinkyPinky

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2002
6,958
1,269
126
Good for him. He worked his ass off and never took vacation time. While other workers were sunning themselves on the beach he was working. Now he's rewarded.

don't see the problem

Not his fault the state doesn't force him to take vacation time.
 

zylander

Platinum Member
Aug 25, 2002
2,501
0
76
In the rest of the world you use it or you lose it.

It doesn't happen in private companies. There are hard caps in the system so that when someone reaches it, vacation time stops accumulating.

My girlfriends company and her moms company are both private companies and both allow their employees to rack up as much vacation time as they can. The employees can use it all on one giant vacation or cash it out. I have one other friend that works for a private companie which has the same policy, cant remember it off the top of my head though.

Good for him. He worked his ass off and never took vacation time. While other workers were sunning themselves on the beach he was working. Now he's rewarded.

don't see the problem

Not his fault the state doesn't force him to take vacation time.


I feel the same way. This guy didnt cheat his way into this money, he never took vacations and just cashed all his time out at the end. Its CAs fault for letting it happen.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,120
776
126
"James C. Tudor Jr., the former president of the State Compensation Insurance Fund".
Typical state employee, head of a fund.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
He just took his money in an unusual way.

I guess being a California Teacher, is a good thing.

-John {cept for living in California)
 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
I hate it when media takes a few extreme examples and paint a totally distorted pictures to sell their stories. But looking at CA state finances, I would not be surprised that CA state employees are being paid (salary+pension+vacation pay...etc) at a scale out of line with the market.

Does anyone have a link to how much CA state spends on their state employees (on per employee basis)? I would rather look at some non-sensational source, and see how out of line their pays are. Those info should be the first thing all you CA tax payer look at when the state finance is collapsing. It would suck when all the state employees sit there and collects tons of money from their benefits when everything else is being cut. But it would suck also if media paints an unfair picture using a few extreme examples and those state employees get blamed unfairly.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Imagine what it would cost to hire a few more doctors. Then the state would have to pay the malpractice insurance on the additional doctors. This probably saved the state over a million $$ in ten years or so. Does not sound that bad. An experienced doctor is probably worth more than 3 interns. Maybe this is just an exception to the rule. The state probably asked him to keep working without vacation time and told him they would pay it when he retired.

Dont know how things work in California, but I could see this happening.

I think you are just jealous. When you take your vacation this year I hope you enjoy it.
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
he worked INSTEAD of taking time off!!

how is that considered "entitlement" ?? His compensation package ensured he would be compensated for time he was unable to take off.

If you think he worked the system to his advantage you are crazy. It was more like the system worked his ass to the BONE and now the system has to retire him probably because he is too old to continue to work. OTHERWISE you can bet the SYSTEM would still be working his ass to the bone!

No one wants to do that job... Working in the State Prison system is treacherous.

If I got that kind of payout on termination, I think I'd happily be the resident proctologist.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,120
776
126
I hate it when media takes a few extreme examples and paint a totally distorted pictures to sell their stories. But looking at CA state finances, I would not be surprised that CA state employees are being paid (salary+pension+vacation pay...etc) at a scale out of line with the market.

Does anyone have a link to how much CA state spends on their state employees (on per employee basis)? I would rather look at some non-sensational source, and see how out of line their pays are. Those info should be the first thing all you CA tax payer look at when the state finance is collapsing. It would suck when all the state employees sit there and collects tons of money from their benefits when everything else is being cut. But it would suck also if media paints an unfair picture using a few extreme examples and those state employees get blamed unfairly.

http://www.dpa.ca.gov/tcs2006/table-3.htm
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Isnt vacation time supposed to be funded? Which is one of the reasons why private organizations are pretty aggressive on the use it or lose it rules? In MN a few years ago a super for a suburb school district had about 1 million in vacation time saved over a 20-30 year career.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Why are so many people upset that a state worker was actually working? Say he uses all his vacation every year, then the state would be paying him to not work as well as paying someone else to cover for him. This way, they just pay him for his time off and hire someone else they would have to hire anyway. Wouldn't that actually save money over the years?

Or are people just jealous that he took hardly any vacation for decades and earned a nice reward for it? If California wasn't hosed for a variety of more significant reasons, then no one would care.

Here is what will happen. People will be pissed over the money. The State will change rules and make it unattractive for any physician to replace this guy. The state will be forced to contract out this work and probably pay 2 -3X what they paid the retiree.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,120
776
126
Here is what is actually going to happen in CA.
Pension reform will take place. They will reduce the pensions for new hires. People will still apply but not the more intelligent ones. They can make more in the private sector.
So, in order to attract more qualified applicants, they will have to raise pay. When they raise pay for new applicants, they will also have to raise the pay a like amount for the workers under the previous system.
End result, no savings.

This isn't rocket science but state employees are a fair and fun target.

Twenty years ago when I started with the state, I did so knowing I would be paid less than my private worker counterparts. I did so willingly because I knew the end result was a more secure retirement and that I would have a better vacation plan. That was an acceptable trade off for me.

In those twenty years I have worked in miserable conditions with low bid (junk) equipment. I have worked most Christmas' and New Years'. Almost exclusively on the night shift. When it storms, we work 12 hours on and 12 hours off. Seven days a week. For however long the storm lasts. 33 days was the longest stretch for me. We are not allowed to take time off during the winter because they need everyone on to cover 24 hour operations.
In the spring and summer, they block out weeks to months at a time for no time off so they can fix the winter damage. Paving, shoulders, etc. So that vacation time starts adding up.

Then they furlough us but make us work the furlough days and bank them. Now we have vacation time building up along with the furlough time. We are also able to take 75 hours of comp time in lieu of overtime. (OT in snow country is 200 - 800 hours a year depending on where you work) We have to use furlough time before we use vacation. I haven't touched my vacation time in over a year.

I also pay taxes, just like all the outraged taxpayers.

Personally, I think arnie should have just cut the budget of every department 10% and let the department heads find where they wanted to make the cuts.
If that wasn't enough then he should have started lay offs.

Instead, he wanted to grandstand and dick around. Now that we knocked that dick into the dirt, his ego won't allow him to let go.
 

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
This guys is exaclty whats wrong with government. No small business owner can afford to pay its workers an 800 thousand retirement bonus. They'd go bankrupt. Oops, isn't California bankrupt already?

Its almost like there is a difference between someone working a large organization and a small business. Maybe you can go find a 4th grader to help you figure it out.