- Apr 20, 2008
- 10,067
- 990
- 126
So take them away and put them in an orphanage. 9 out of 10 would be better off.
I'm the OP, and I think absolutely not. Are you high?
So take them away and put them in an orphanage. 9 out of 10 would be better off.
So take them away and put them in an orphanage. 9 out of 10 would be better off.
or give vouchers/cards that can only be used for certain things that are required for living.
TV's are not required.
I sell electronics for a store (perfect for my experience and knowledge while being in school). Last night a woman with 2 kids paid for a 32" HDTV with a food stamps card that does cash and food stamps from the state. She had me check the balances of the card and saw that there was $600 on the food stamps portion and $270 on the cash portion. This woman had *3* car keys (w/ fobs) on her key-ring to different cars and CLEARLY didn't her food stamps card. My wife and I share 1!
I hate knowing that my taxes go towards shit like this. Fuck her.
I'm the OP, and I think absolutely not. Are you high?
I said this in a previous EBT/Welfare post.
Food stamps should be handled like WIC (Women with Infant Children). WIC allows you to only buy what is on the list of supported products.
So every month they get 2-jars of peanut butter, 4-loaves of bread or tortillas, 2lbs of cheese, 4-gallons of milk, 6-boxes of cereal and so on and so forth.
Next time you go to the grocery store you will see WIC labels next to certain products, which means it is eligible. So Chex or Cheerios is OK, Lucky Charms & Froot Loops are not OK. WIC was set up with nutritional guidelines to keep children under 3 & their mom's healthy..
FoodStamps should be done the exact same way - You should not be allowed to buy Rib Eye steaks, you should be allowed to buy ground beef or chuck roast. And you should be given a set amount for your family based on the number of people in the household receiving Food Stamps.
So - obesity comes down, our farmers sell more fresh fruit, veggies, and meat and far less processed foods. Design this system based on ethnicity as well - so a white person from Iowa gets the #3 listing of monthly food while a Latino family from El Paso gets a listing of food allowed from list #7. This would take regional/religious/dietary/ethnic considerations into play and make reasonable accommodations.
And why not throw in a box or two of brownie mix per month, or 2 1/2 G's of ice cream. I'm not here to punish people for being poor but to motivate them to get off Food Stamps.
Its far from a perfect system but much better than the one we have now.
If you are claiming the woman used a food stamp card to pay for a tv you are either working for an illegal retailer or are completely mistaken.
If you pm with the name of the store I will see to it they get investigated.
Why didnt you refuse her service?
These people have little to no other income and I said some of them are disabled as well.
No one is getting a free ride, those who are able body are required to attend courses on finding a job, and required to actively look for employment.
It is cash assistance to be used for anything they wish.
Again the EXACT same thing can be said about people who are disabled, who I have already pointed out many of the people on this program are disabled.
5% of stuff on television is educational and .0000000000000000000000000001% of children ever watch it. The rest is phineas and ferb and good luck charlie. 99.18% of American children (fact!) watch too much of it.Would you deny their children the ability to watch television?
.0000000000000000000000000001% of children ever watch it. The rest is phineas and ferb and good luck charlie. 99.18% of American children (fact!) watch too much of it.
I'm very disappoint at the number of people who do NOT have a problem with using public benefits, aka my life is damn near in ruins and I'm close to dying and/or kids starving to death, on a fucking 32" television.5% of stuff on television is educational and .0000000000000000000000000001% of children ever watch it. The rest is phineas and ferb and good luck charlie. 99.18% of American children (fact!) watch too much of it.
These aren't people dying, these are people who need aid. No different than people who are disabled and on aid.
A television is not "aid". It is a luxury good. A patent non-essential.These aren't people dying, these are people who need aid. No different than people who are disabled and on aid.
A television is not "aid". It is a luxury good. A patent non-essential.
This isn't food stamps or the SNAP program. It is cash assistance to be used for anything they wish.
These aren't people dying, these are people who need aid. No different than people who are disabled and on aid.
What about those who are legitimately bi-polar through no fault of their own>>?????You do understand that many of these are Bi polar correct . No one who claims to be bi polar belongs on disability. lack of self control doesn't get you on disability it should get you a jail cell .
__________________
A television is not "aid". It is a luxury good. A patent non-essential.
