miketheidiot
Lifer
or we could just repeal the recent tax cuts.... Budget = teh fixed.
Originally posted by: Queasy
The Third Reich was a decidedly leftist/facist entity. NAZI stood for Nationalist Socialist Party so I'm not sure how this equates to anything on the right.Originally posted by: silverpig
reinvented third reich = USA becoming uber right wing
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: Queasy
The Third Reich was a decidedly leftist/facist entity. NAZI stood for Nationalist Socialist Party so I'm not sure how this equates to anything on the right.Originally posted by: silverpig
reinvented third reich = USA becoming uber right wing
There was nothing socialist about them. Hitler made sure any socailists were history before the beer hall putsch in the 20's. Read history before you spout nonsense.
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: Queasy
The Third Reich was a decidedly leftist/facist entity. NAZI stood for Nationalist Socialist Party so I'm not sure how this equates to anything on the right.Originally posted by: silverpig
reinvented third reich = USA becoming uber right wing
There was nothing socialist about them. Hitler made sure any socailists were history before the beer hall putsch in the 20's. Read history before you spout nonsense.
Originally posted by: polm
sweet...thank goodness I'm not a Veteran, or this would suck 😉
or maybe we could realize that spending govt money to "help the needy" has never priduced any positive results, and has only created a deeper problem.Originally posted by: arsbanned
Originally posted by: Crimson
Lets see all the democrats who have been preaching balancing the budget for the past 4 years now backtrack on everything they said. Of course the excuses will be 'It will hurt children, old people, etc".. We'll get all the lip service on why they can't cut the budget, then in 4 years they will be saying the Republicans didnt cut the budget enough.
Maybe we could take the hundreds of billions wasted on attacking a sovereign nation for no reason and use that to balance the budget rather than slashing programs for the needy.
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: Queasy
The Third Reich was a decidedly leftist/facist entity. NAZI stood for Nationalist Socialist Party so I'm not sure how this equates to anything on the right.Originally posted by: silverpig
reinvented third reich = USA becoming uber right wing
There was nothing socialist about them. Hitler made sure any socailists were history before the beer hall putsch in the 20's. Read history before you spout nonsense.
Yes, Hitler despised traditional socialism. However, the Nazi party did take some socialist traits in terms of economics (centralized and government controlled) and splintered off in every other facet. Hence, National Socialism. I know my history, thank you.
I guess it depends. State (ie the people) controlled economic initiative. Plus, part of the Nazi party's programs during the 20's included redistribution of income, profit sharing, pension increases, and free education. That may have been done to appease the people but those all are socialist initiatives.Originally posted by: Steeplerot
That is called corprate fascism not socialism. Nothing was owned by the people, so how could it be socialism?
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Just get the fsck out of Iraq and we can fund projects AND spend less.
Hitler challenged and beat then Nazi Party leader Anton Drexler in 1921.Originally posted by: Steeplerot
What the nazi party represesented before AH took it over is apples to oranges to what it grew to be. It was like 20 guys gettign drunk an talking about stuff before it became what is now known as national socialism when hitler came into the picture.
Hitler HATED commies even more then jews from his speeches until he really got power.... This is why so many flipped out when he allied with stalin there. He rose to power off of thuggery and wooing of corprate intrests lying to them until he started nationlizing them right under their nose.
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Just get the fsck out of Iraq and we can fund projects AND spend less.
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Just get the fsck out of Iraq and we can fund projects AND spend less.
Yeah because ignoring threats in the world cost us nothing.. oh wait.. maybe just a couple buildings in New York.. and a few lives.. no big deal.
Will he be cutting corporate welfare?Originally posted by: ntdz
$2.5 Trillion Budget Plan Cuts Many Programs
I've been watching to see cuts like these for a long time now. Glad it's finally happening.
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Just get the fsck out of Iraq and we can fund projects AND spend less.
Yeah because ignoring threats in the world cost us nothing.. oh wait.. maybe just a couple buildings in New York.. and a few lives.. no big deal.
You mean now you can show that Iraq did that?
You're a genius - don't hold out on us here!
Iran . . . hmmm. North Korea . . . hmm. HIV/AIDS and procreative rights . . . hmmm. Medicare . . . hmm.Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Just get the fsck out of Iraq and we can fund projects AND spend less.
Yeah because ignoring threats in the world cost us nothing.. oh wait.. maybe just a couple buildings in New York.. and a few lives.. no big deal.
Originally posted by: Train
or maybe we could realize that spending govt money to "help the needy" has never priduced any positive results, and has only created a deeper problem.Originally posted by: arsbanned
Originally posted by: Crimson
Lets see all the democrats who have been preaching balancing the budget for the past 4 years now backtrack on everything they said. Of course the excuses will be 'It will hurt children, old people, etc".. We'll get all the lip service on why they can't cut the budget, then in 4 years they will be saying the Republicans didnt cut the budget enough.
Maybe we could take the hundreds of billions wasted on attacking a sovereign nation for no reason and use that to balance the budget rather than slashing programs for the needy.
Originally posted by: bdude
Originally posted by: Queasy
The Third Reich was a decidedly leftist/facist entity. NAZI stood for Nationalist Socialist Party so I'm not sure how this equates to anything on the right.Originally posted by: silverpig
reinvented third reich = USA becoming uber right wing
Uh...just because they call it the DPRK doesn't mean it's democratic. In case you were unaware, fascism isn't by any means on the same political spectrum as socialism.
Originally posted by: Ferocious
Nazi Germany had nothing to do with socialism. It was an authoritarian regime in the extreme.
Many European countries and even the USA are much closer to socialism than Nazi Germany ever was.
ummm the Nazi's used the word socialist to gain support in their rise to power. Worker's party was another one that was used back then during their quest for power.
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Just get the fsck out of Iraq and we can fund projects AND spend less.
Yeah because ignoring threats in the world cost us nothing.. oh wait.. maybe just a couple buildings in New York.. and a few lives.. no big deal.
Germany and Italy declared war on the U.S. after Pearl Harbor.Originally posted by: Crimson
Well that sounds all nice and all.. we attacked a sovereign nation in Germany and Japan too..and Germany never attacked us.. so, your simple trite little statement of 'we invaded a sovereign nation' is simply silly. Please try another attempt at a poor argument.