Bush is getting ready to address the nation

[charrison]

Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
we have to build up there first. I say we attack in 2 months

We are ready now.

Half of kuwait is closed off for the military.
Turkey is letting us setup there.
Embassies in Iraq have been closed.

 

[Cuda1447]

Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
we have to build up there first. I say we attack in 2 months

No way, first of all it doesnt take that long to build up. Second of all, if we give him that much time to prepare we may seriously regret it. I say we hit them fast and hard tonight. Merciless. Bombing Baghdad to rubbles.

 

[DanJ]

I don't for one minute think Bush actually wants war

lol...thats why we've been building up a force in the area for the last months...while the inspection we wanted was taking place.

Bush wants war, and he's basically just said he's getting it.

Where doesn't he want war? North Korea most likely, hence he's talking to them and not sending troops to the area.

There's a difference.

 

[Judgement]

Originally posted by: Ylen13
so let me see if i get this right.Iraq said we don't have any weapons,us and alot of different countries don't agree.So what is iraq supposed to do (let say for a second he don't really have those weapons)is he supposed go make them and then declare that he lied and produce the weapons??

If they wanted us to know they didn't have anything they wouldn't have been breaking the UN resolutions for the past 12 years since the Gulf war.

They wouldn't hesitate to let the UN inspectors go whereever, whenever they wanted to go and look for WMD.

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: DanJ

I don't for one minute think Bush actually wants war

lol...thats why we've been building up a force in the area for the last months...while the inspection we wanted was taking place.

Bush wants war, and he's basically just said he's getting it.

Where doesn't he want war? North Korea most likely, hence he's talking to them and not sending troops to the area.

There's a difference.

I guess you missed the news this week were a couple squadrons of b-1s and b-2s are being sent to SK. A carrier is also headed to SK as well. And there will also be an increased troop strengh as well.

 

[Antisocial Virge]

BTW, for those idiots who have forgotten why we're going to war, watch these videos:

WTC vids

Yea I heard Sadam was to blame for Global warming, sudden infant death and the fact that my toaster always burns one piece..lets get him!!

 

[Ylen13]

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: DanJ

I don't for one minute think Bush actually wants war

lol...thats why we've been building up a force in the area for the last months...while the inspection we wanted was taking place.

Bush wants war, and he's basically just said he's getting it.

Where doesn't he want war? North Korea most likely, hence he's talking to them and not sending troops to the area.

There's a difference.

I guess you missed the news this week were a couple squadrons of b-1s and b-2s are being sent to SK. A carrier is also headed to SK as well. And there will also be an increased troop strengh as well.

we will not attack north koreak unless they attack us first.This is not iraq we are speaking about.Nk is much better equipied military and they have so many troups that we would need to drop couple nukes.

 

[Judgement]

Originally posted by: Electrode

Originally posted by: Grasshopper27
I don't for one minute think Bush actually wants war

Then why is he screaming for it every minute of every day?

Its his job to act in the best interest of the US and its citizens.

Saddam poses a threat, he wants to forcefully eliminate the threat because the peaceful way has been failing for the last 12 years. He is doing his duty as commander in chief.

 

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: Ylen13

Originally posted by: brtspears2
This isnt sounding good. He's pointing out all the weapons Iraq still have/developed and other problems in Iraq, terrorism plots.

i haven't seen proven evidence that he really has othern what bush is saying.No hard evidence have been found.

Are you French by any chance?

 

[Gaard]

Originally posted by: Antisocial-Virge

BTW, for those idiots who have forgotten why we're going to war, watch these videos:

WTC vids

Yea I heard Sadam was to blame for Global warming, sudden infant death and the fact that my toaster always burns one piece..lets get him!!

LOL!!

 

[nord1899]

Originally posted by: Ylen13

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: DanJ

I don't for one minute think Bush actually wants war

lol...thats why we've been building up a force in the area for the last months...while the inspection we wanted was taking place.

Bush wants war, and he's basically just said he's getting it.

Where doesn't he want war? North Korea most likely, hence he's talking to them and not sending troops to the area.

There's a difference.

I guess you missed the news this week were a couple squadrons of b-1s and b-2s are being sent to SK. A carrier is also headed to SK as well. And there will also be an increased troop strengh as well.

we will not attack north koreak unless they attack us first.This is not iraq we are speaking about.Nk is much better equipied military and they have so many troups that we would need to drop couple nukes.

The reason we don't attack NK is because they are so damn close to Seoul that they could destroy it before we could do anything. There is no other reason.

 

[Ylen13]

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Ylen13

Originally posted by: brtspears2
This isnt sounding good. He's pointing out all the weapons Iraq still have/developed and other problems in Iraq, terrorism plots.

i haven't seen proven evidence that he really has othern what bush is saying.No hard evidence have been found.

Are you French by any chance?

who are u asking?

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: Ylen13

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: DanJ

I don't for one minute think Bush actually wants war

lol...thats why we've been building up a force in the area for the last months...while the inspection we wanted was taking place.

Bush wants war, and he's basically just said he's getting it.

Where doesn't he want war? North Korea most likely, hence he's talking to them and not sending troops to the area.

There's a difference.

I guess you missed the news this week were a couple squadrons of b-1s and b-2s are being sent to SK. A carrier is also headed to SK as well. And there will also be an increased troop strengh as well.

we will not attack north koreak unless they attack us first.This is not iraq we are speaking about.Nk is much better equipied military and they have so many troups that we would need to drop couple nukes.

NK is hardly better equipped. They have larger forces, but they would be slaughted if they decided to invade SK.

 

[Judgement]

Originally posted by: Ylen13

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: DanJ

I don't for one minute think Bush actually wants war

lol...thats why we've been building up a force in the area for the last months...while the inspection we wanted was taking place.

Bush wants war, and he's basically just said he's getting it.

Where doesn't he want war? North Korea most likely, hence he's talking to them and not sending troops to the area.

There's a difference.

I guess you missed the news this week were a couple squadrons of b-1s and b-2s are being sent to SK. A carrier is also headed to SK as well. And there will also be an increased troop strengh as well.

we will not attack north koreak unless they attack us first.This is not iraq we are speaking about.Nk is much better equipied military and they have so many troups that we would need to drop couple nukes.

You are right N. Korea is better equiped (not by much) but we would never drop a couple nukes, not even one... unless of course it was unavoidable action that needed to be taken because we were certain N. Korea was going to be using them on us.

 

[Tab]

I hope he does attack, I am sick of hearing idiotic anti-war protester and CNN's stupid Ad Campagin.
/end rant

As for the anti-war protesters, this war is about peace, freedom and oil. Its multitasking!

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: Judgement

Originally posted by: Ylen13

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: DanJ

I don't for one minute think Bush actually wants war

lol...thats why we've been building up a force in the area for the last months...while the inspection we wanted was taking place.

Bush wants war, and he's basically just said he's getting it.

Where doesn't he want war? North Korea most likely, hence he's talking to them and not sending troops to the area.

There's a difference.

I guess you missed the news this week were a couple squadrons of b-1s and b-2s are being sent to SK. A carrier is also headed to SK as well. And there will also be an increased troop strengh as well.

we will not attack north koreak unless they attack us first.This is not iraq we are speaking about.Nk is much better equipied military and they have so many troups that we would need to drop couple nukes.

You are right N. Korea is better equiped (not by much) but we would never drop a couple nukes, not even one... unless of course it was unavoidable action that needed to be taken because we were certain N. Korea was going to be using them on us.

IS this better equipped?

 

[charrison]

NK army is not modern either.....

 

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: Ylen13

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Ylen13

Originally posted by: brtspears2
This isnt sounding good. He's pointing out all the weapons Iraq still have/developed and other problems in Iraq, terrorism plots.

i haven't seen proven evidence that he really has othern what bush is saying.No hard evidence have been found.

Are you French by any chance?

who are u asking?

You. Both you and Chirac would not be happy unless you found a nuke, with a certificate of authenticity signed by Saddam himself

 

[Judgement]

Originally posted by: charrison
NK army is not modern either.....

Too much info to read heh.

I'm assuming the summary is that they are better equiped then I previously thought?

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: Judgement

Originally posted by: charrison
NK army is not modern either.....

Too much info to read heh.

I'm assuming the summary is that they are better equiped then I previously thought?

If better equipped means they have large numbers of 40 year old tanks, then yes.

 

[drewshin]

im still having a hard time believing they found such good evidence such as those trucks at certain sites, and as powell says, "they disappeared." heh heh, what liars. as usual, they are only telling us part of the truth. i guess the whole truth will come out in the end. but we'll feel duped again by the government, as we have with every other war since the spanish american war.

this has very little to wmd's or the welfare of the iraqi people, and more about getting revenge with saddam, and even more to do with oil.

wow, hasnt anyone read their u.s. history before? do you suddenly think that the u.s. government is going to stop lying just now?

im on the fence as to whether there should be war, but let's not fool ourselves into thinking we're going in there with the best of intentions (welfare of the iraqi people, security of the united states, my a$$).

 

[MaxDepth]

I'm getting an alert on the CCN.com.

Breaking news:

State Department issues worldwide caution to Americans abroad, warning of heightened threat of terror attacks including possible use of chemical or biological agents. Details soon.

/me feeding the panic.

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: drewshin
im still having a hard time believing they found such good evidence such as those trucks at certain sites, and as powell says, "they disappeared." heh heh, what liars. as usual, they are only telling us part of the truth. i guess the whole truth will come out in the end. but we'll feel duped again by the government, as we have with every other war since the spanish american war.

this has very little to wmd's or the welfare of the iraqi people, and more about getting revenge with saddam, and even more to do with oil.

wow, hasnt anyone read their u.s. history before? do you suddenly think that the u.s. government is going to stop lying just now?

im on the fence as to whether there should be war, but let's not fool ourselves into thinking we're going in there with the best of intentions (welfare of the iraqi people, security of the united states, my a$$).

Yes, let them the world everything we know. That way people and stuff can get moved again.

 

[Antisocial Virge]

Originally posted by: drewshin
im still having a hard time believing they found such good evidence such as those trucks at certain sites, and as powell says, "they disappeared." heh heh, what liars. as usual, they are only telling us part of the truth. i guess the whole truth will come out in the end. but we'll feel duped again by the government, as we have with every other war since the spanish american war.

this has very little to wmd's or the welfare of the iraqi people, and more about getting revenge with saddam, and even more to do with oil.

wow, hasnt anyone read their u.s. history before? do you suddenly think that the u.s. government is going to stop lying just now?

im on the fence as to whether there should be war, but let's not fool ourselves into thinking we're going in there with the best of intentions (welfare of the iraqi people, security of the united states, my a$$).

PROOF !!! Picture done by Hugh Janus of Something awful.

 

[Electrode]

Originally posted by: Judgement

Originally posted by: Electrode

Originally posted by: Grasshopper27
I don't for one minute think Bush actually wants war

Then why is he screaming for it every minute of every day?

Its his job to act in the best interest of the US and its citizens.

Saddam poses a threat, he wants to forcefully eliminate the threat because the peaceful way has been failing for the last 12 years. He is doing his duty as commander in chief.

What threat does Saddam pose to the US, or our interests?