Originally posted by: Don_Vito
Originally posted by: arcain
I admit that I am a Kobe fan.. but the beginning of the article where the writer tells of an incident of an unamed championship player kissing a female is intentionally vague. It implies that the player was Kobe, but he goes out of his way to make sure it is never stated explicitly. I read that part a couple of times, and I have to read it to be that the story was about somebody else and the writer wanted sensationalize his story. Remember, though I am a Kobe fan but seems like the writer did some careful maneuvering with his piece.
Another comment: Did anybody notice during the DA press conference, he was asked that if in filing the charges he was acting in the concensus of the other counties' DAs that he had consulted with. He did not answer the question and dodged it (after verbally stumbling a bit) by reiterating that he had consulted with other DAs. I'm no interrogator, but it implies to me that his case not as absolute as it could be. Any answer besides "Yes, there is a concensus that charges should be filed" shows a weakness. If there was not even a majority there, proving it "beyond a reasonable doubt" will not be easy.
I did not see the press conference you describe, but I see no reason why a DA would be obligated to consult with prosecutors in other jurisdictions before charging, nor do I think the lack of such a consensus would indicate a lack of confidence in the case. In my experience working in U.S. Attorney's offices and as a military prosecutor, these conversations take place between the prosecutors within an office, not between one office and another.
To reiterate what I have said above, I have no earthly idea if Kobe is guilty, and am not presuming his guilt. The DA seems generally confident that his case is strong, but a certain amount of that may be marketing - it would not do him, or the case any good if he were perceived as tentative about it.