What a way to get people to watch your new show.
Was it *really* a mistake?
From the mouth of Vince Gilligan himself. Gale is gone, folks.
VG: Gotcha. Thats interesting, because Im hearing that from some folks, that question. To me, for what its worth, its not actually meant to be ambiguous. Its meant to be, Oh my god, Jesse shot poor Gale. But Im realizing now that when people see the camera come dollying around so its looking down the barrel of the gun, some are reading that as maybe hes changing his point of aim. But thats not what we intended. Apparently its not as clear as I thought it would be.
That's not what Vince said. Read it again.
He never comes out and says that Jesse shot Gale, he said he meant for the audience to have no ambiguity that Jesse shot Gale. He wanted it to look like it happened, not that it actually happened. I still think there's a possibility that Jesse didn't shoot Gale and that Jesse is going to capture him to trade him for Walt.
ROFLMAO!! If that's what you think passes for a stinging comeback I was right all along. The show is way over your head. Stick to HD cartoons.
*facepalm*
The fact that you can't understand anything that isn't spelled out for you in tiny one syllable words doesn't mean the rest of us are stupid too. The producers intentionally went to a cut-to-black ending and they wouldn't have bothered if they were going to remove the cliffhanger in a next-day interview. It was intentionally ambiguous because they wanted it to be ambiguous. There are a dozen different directions this can go and in a bunch of them Gale will be alive. Right now Gale is Schrödinger's cat, he's both alive and dead and even though Vince so completely fooled you it doesn't mean he fooled everyone else.
To me, for what it’s worth, it’s not actually meant to be ambiguous. It’s meant to be, “Oh my god, Jesse shot poor Gale.”
The fact that you can't understand anything that isn't spelled out for you in tiny one syllable words doesn't mean the rest of us are stupid too. The producers intentionally went to a cut-to-black ending and they wouldn't have bothered if they were going to remove the cliffhanger in a next-day interview. It was intentionally ambiguous because they wanted it to be ambiguous. There are a dozen different directions this can go and in a bunch of them Gale will be alive. Right now Gale is Schrödinger's cat, he's both alive and dead and even though Vince so completely fooled you it doesn't mean he fooled everyone else.
Wow, thats some good tvlast nights eps was just awesome, esp considering the previous one was also so good. Best show of the last few years, it just keeps delivering without fail, pretty amazing.
While I agree it keeps delivering overall, I've been pretty disappointed by a number of episodes this season and a couple over the other 2. There's been more fail than there should be IMO, which really stands out when your seasons are so short. Some really good eps but I feel short changed this season.
The fact that you can't understand anything that isn't spelled out for you in tiny one syllable words doesn't mean the rest of us are stupid too. The producers intentionally went to a cut-to-black ending and they wouldn't have bothered if they were going to remove the cliffhanger in a next-day interview. It was intentionally ambiguous because they wanted it to be ambiguous. There are a dozen different directions this can go and in a bunch of them Gale will be alive. Right now Gale is Schrödinger's cat, he's both alive and dead and even though Vince so completely fooled you it doesn't mean he fooled everyone else.
I sort of feel the same way, but then I really had high and probably unrealistic expectations. I could re-watch every episode of Season 1 and 2 and enjoy them again, that's how good they were. I couldn't do that with Season 3.
As I said though, it was probably unrealistic to expect the 'every episode is gold' trend to continue forever.
THe never comes out and says that Jesse shot Gale, he said he meant for the audience to have no ambiguity that Jesse shot Gale. He wanted it to look like it happened, not that it actually happened. I still think there's a possibility that Jesse didn't shoot Gale and that Jesse is going to capture him to trade him for Walt.
Anyone wonder WTF was the point of the intro to this episode?
Anyone wonder WTF was the point of the intro to this episode?
I couldn't tell if that house they were buying was the one they are living in now, but if it was, then maybe they shot that scene a long time ago, back before Walt shaved his head, and thought, "We can work this scene in somewhere." That, along, with the stupid fly episode, was another scene that just seems to be a waste.
I found it depressing, juxtaposing the hope he had for a big family and an ambitious, wealthy lifestyle against his broken dreams and family. It also shows that Walt can be irresponsible, buying a bigger house than they could afford.
The show features a lot of asides that are for emotional effect, not "logic" or plot..
I couldn't tell if that house they were buying was the one they are living in now, but if it was, then maybe they shot that scene a long time ago, back before Walt shaved his head, and thought, "We can work this scene in somewhere." That, along, with the stupid fly episode, was another scene that just seems to be a waste.
I just hope Saul survives...