Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: Amused
Again, it's painfully obvious you've never had to face violence and have absilutely no idea what you're talking about.
Sticks and bats are considered dangerous weapons. People are beaten to death by sticks and bats every day.
I have experience in martial arts competition (low level) as well as street-fighting.
My statement was that a broom stick is about as dangerous as a punch and I stand by it. Ask a martial artist or anyone with the appropriate training. If other hand shapes than the classic punch are included then I would say hands are more lethal due to the possibility of pinpoint striking.
You do not shoot people who attack you with fists and sticks and things.
Ok you pissant, then ask me.
I started in martial arts when I was 6. I've kept up pretty well over the last 28 years. I served two years in the military, and 12 in security working with law enforcement. I am a certified self-defense instructor and teach community classes on firearms, crime, safety, and self-defense.
Yes, a broom handle is ABSOLUTELY a lethal weapon, both in ability and by legal definition (I posted the applicable RCW entry earlier). What you personally think is just an opinon, and is in opposition to the law. You have the ABSOLUTE right to use lethal force to defend yourself against any attack which risks your life.
I will agree that hands and feet are also lethal weapons, and I fully support allowing the use of lethal force if attacked in hand-to-hand combat. Furthermore, unless you are totally illogical, you would too, and here's why:
You yourself stated that hands and feet are equally or more lethal than a stick/broom handle/club. By legal definition those items ARE considered lethal weapons and you have the right to use lethal force to defend yourself against them. Therefore, you MUST believe that you have the right to use lethal force against unarmed combat as well. Otherwise you're a hypocrite.