Boy, 14, Shot and Killed by Police Officer

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

kt

Diamond Member
Apr 1, 2000
6,032
1,348
136
Originally posted by: eits
"the cop had no choice"? wtf?? are you kidding me?

it's a 14 year old with a broken broom handle. i guess a cop doesn't go through hand-to-hand training to disarm people with weapons in their hands whatsoever. yeah, i guess he had no choice but to shoot a 15 year old boy. he couldn't have subdued the kid with a tazer or wrestled the stick away from him. he had no choice but to fire his gun at a kid with a stick in his hand.

:roll:;

oh, by the way, cops wear kevlar. wood < kevlar.

i swear, this thread is full of retards or something.

By retards, you mean those people who believe that the police officer should put his life in danger by trying to hand combat a guy who just hit him with a broomstick over the head SEVERAL times and with enough force to break the broomstick and cause a concussion, then yes I agree. Cop or not, he's still human and when he feels that his life is in danger he has every right to try defend himself from someone who's charging at him with a sharp object.

 

Unheard

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2003
3,774
9
81
Originally posted by: kt
Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
That question is flawed. We're not cops, what any of us do means absolutely nothing...unless you're trained to handle these sorts of situations.

Not only are there at least 3 cops on this board, but I'm trained to handle these sorts of situations. I've taken courses on knife and blunt weapon disarmament, application of deadly force, and a lot more. You don't need to wait for someone to strike you to respond with deadly force. By menacing you with that weapon within a useable range (20ft) they are a definite threat to your life. In this situation, he gave the officer a concussion. Like I said before, I would have shot him at least 3 times.

i hope you have a good lawyer

I will take a good lawyer over a mortician anyday.

As would I... Reminds me of the old saying, "I would rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6."

Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
Originally posted by: PELarson
More about the shooting and a very different reason for the officer(s) being called to the house.

"The youth's mother - a state correctional officer - called police to her home in the 300 block of Font Hill Ave. about 9:30 a.m. with a report that her son was assaulting her, according to Lt. Col. Glenn Williams, the department's Area 2 commander."

It will be interesting to see the exact cause of death. If the officer shot the youth in the shoulder did the bullet hit an artery or was the cause of death something else.


Seems the mothers description of the event is much different than the officers per her attorney

"Pettit agreed with the police account that by the time the first officer left the house, the situation was under control and the youth had calmed down. But the attorney charged that Mitter followed Cooper up to his room, and then back down to the kitchen, heckling and provoking him.

"It was like two kids bickering," Pettit said. Downstairs, Cooper was holding a long-handled dustpan, the attorney said, but "never touched the police officer."

Pettit said the officer used Mace and then shot the youth, while Carter, holding her granddaughter, stood between them.

Didn't touch the cop? Wow the kid must of had magical powers to give a cop lacerations and a concussion w/o touching him. I hope the bastard kid rots in hell, where he deserves to be. And the mother should be tried for false testimony.
 

bluemax

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2000
7,182
0
0
Talk about no-win scenario... the officer has to beat him down to submission to save himself from a stabbing, or shoot to defend.

"Police brutailty" in both cases. About the only way out of that scenario is to whip open his shirt and say, "stab away!"
 

Suture

Senior member
Sep 17, 2003
454
0
0
Unfortunately that police officer is probably screwed, especially since he's still new. After macing the kid down and the kid still resisting the officer, IMO the officer did what he had to do. Shame the kid died, but you cannot blame the officer.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: loic2003
a) why was there only one cop or what was the other cop doing? Usually they go in pairs so one can back up the other's word. Less likely to be one person's view against another. Two *trained* police officers against a kid with a stick shouldn't be much of a contest.

b) Kids have tantrums. Kids with mental issues have very badn tantrums. It's no reason to kill them.

c) Surely in this day and age one of the gun manufacturers could create a tazer/firearm combo? The taser section perhaps fiting below the barrel like a laser sight. The cops can then set their weapons to stun or kill mode.

d) Why did the police not whip out his truncheon and beat the kid off him?

Read the thread for good responses to all those questions/statements.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: eits
"the cop had no choice"? wtf?? are you kidding me?

it's a 14 year old with a broken broom handle. i guess a cop doesn't go through hand-to-hand training to disarm people with weapons in their hands whatsoever. yeah, i guess he had no choice but to shoot a 15 year old boy. he couldn't have subdued the kid with a tazer or wrestled the stick away from him. he had no choice but to fire his gun at a kid with a stick in his hand.

:roll:;

oh, by the way, cops wear kevlar. wood < kevlar.

i swear, this thread is full of retards or something.

Yup, and you appear to be among the most retarded. Read the thread for fuller explanations of the real issues. Then go out and actually do this type of work before you think to make judgements on it.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Azndude2190
Police officers should be equiped with non-leathal drugs that put the person to sleep immediatly
not a bad idea, but then the person suffers a heart attack or a fatal allergic reaction to the sleep medicine and you have yet another lawsuit.

still, it's better than shooting to kill. i am not discounting that fact.


The thing is, in a number of cases officers have, under the stress of a crisis situation, gone to grab their tasers and grabbed their service pistols instead (or, in a case that once appeared before my mother, intended to load less-lethal beanbag shotgun rounds and loaded lead slugs instead), with fatal or near-fatal consequences. This creates another potential liability problem.

I think many of the posters in this thread are totally misguided in terms of this specific case. Frankly it sounds to me like a situation where deadly force was clearly justified. I feel bad for the kid's family, but I also feel bad for the cop who was forced to shoot him.
and it's not like he was shooting to kill (heart, neck or head shot). he did hit the young man in the shoulder.

If he was any kind of cop at all (or any other gun owner), he was just shooting center mass (and poorly at that). There is no such thing as shooting to kill or shooting to wound. You pull the weapon and fire center mass. Most departments train for two center-mass, follow up to the head, but in a fight it doesn't always go that way. Guns are there to kill, not wound, not scare.
 

CVSiN

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2004
9,289
1
0
Originally posted by: Inspector Jihad
rofl, you're all idiots...a trained police officer needs to shoot a 14 year old kid with a broom in self defense. Bullshit. Let see when one of your loved ones gets murdered for something like this.

And Mrvile...who the fvck are you to say if someone is wanted or not in our society?

Your an idiot... flat out..
sorry kid or not gonna get dropped you come at me with a wep.. thats what they are TRAINED to do.. and the guy picked his shot... he shot him in the damn shoulder..

he maced the kid and he kept on coming..
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: eits
"the cop had no choice"? wtf?? are you kidding me?

it's a 14 year old with a broken broom handle. i guess a cop doesn't go through hand-to-hand training to disarm people with weapons in their hands whatsoever. yeah, i guess he had no choice but to shoot a 15 year old boy. he couldn't have subdued the kid with a tazer or wrestled the stick away from him. he had no choice but to fire his gun at a kid with a stick in his hand.

:roll:;

oh, by the way, cops wear kevlar. wood < kevlar.

i swear, this thread is full of retards or something.
Anyone strong enough to break a broom handle over someone's head is strong enough to shank you through the neck. Your assumptions are funny: a) that the officer had Kevlar on to begin with, b) that Kevlar would stop a sharp puncture to the neck or head, c) that officer had a tazer on him, d) that officer was in any shape for hand to hand combat after having a broomstick smashed over his head, e) you believe a poor mother from the ghetto who's looking to get paid who blatantly lies and says her son "never touched the police officer".

You = born yesterday.

you = with no humanity in you


do you think a mother takes money over her own son?

 

oddyager

Diamond Member
May 21, 2005
3,398
0
76
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: eits
"the cop had no choice"? wtf?? are you kidding me?

it's a 14 year old with a broken broom handle. i guess a cop doesn't go through hand-to-hand training to disarm people with weapons in their hands whatsoever. yeah, i guess he had no choice but to shoot a 15 year old boy. he couldn't have subdued the kid with a tazer or wrestled the stick away from him. he had no choice but to fire his gun at a kid with a stick in his hand.

:roll:;

oh, by the way, cops wear kevlar. wood < kevlar.

i swear, this thread is full of retards or something.
Anyone strong enough to break a broom handle over someone's head is strong enough to shank you through the neck. Your assumptions are funny: a) that the officer had Kevlar on to begin with, b) that Kevlar would stop a sharp puncture to the neck or head, c) that officer had a tazer on him, d) that officer was in any shape for hand to hand combat after having a broomstick smashed over his head, e) you believe a poor mother from the ghetto who's looking to get paid who blatantly lies and says her son "never touched the police officer".

You = born yesterday.

you = with no humanity in you


do you think a mother takes money over her own son?


Mother's have drown their own children. It's a sad reality but yes anything is possible.
 

CVSiN

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2004
9,289
1
0
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
lol, that officer is a lazy ass. He could've tackled and cuffed the kid.

And risk taking a jagged piece of wood in the chest? Not worth the risk.

Do officers were give a choice to wear Bullet resistant vests these days? Did he actually wore one during the incident?

Bullet proof isn't stab proof at all. There are two entirely different types of vests for bullets and edged/piercing weapons. Neither of those is for bashing either.


It's hard to believe that a bullet proof vest will not protect a very slow projectile that breaks upon impact (a broken broom head, assuming it is wood).

Even a makeshift weapon has a good chance of going thru most of the surface area of a vest (at least that's what i've read in various reports, and after wearing one for years I'd agree). Just think about it, if that wasn't true why would they make different types of vests (ballistic vs puncture)? If you're wearing a trauma plate then that one location is probably safe. Even so, what keeps him from stabbing you in the arm, leg, crotch, neck, face, hand, foot, etc?

Now that's a different situation, I was replying about the chest. This is about a freaking broom we're talking about. Not just some extremely sharp pointed weapon.

reading comprehension 4 the win..
he snapped the broomhandle over the cops head thereby breaking it into a sharp spear...
have you not ever tried this? a broken broomhandle makes a VERY good/strong weapon..
i have no doubt it would penetrate a vest just as well as a knife..
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
lol, that officer is a lazy ass. He could've tackled and cuffed the kid.

And risk taking a jagged piece of wood in the chest? Not worth the risk.

Do officers were give a choice to wear Bullet resistant vests these days? Did he actually wore one during the incident?

Bullet proof isn't stab proof at all. There are two entirely different types of vests for bullets and edged/piercing weapons. Neither of those is for bashing either.


It's hard to believe that a bullet proof vest will not protect a very slow projectile that breaks upon impact (a broken broom head, assuming it is wood).

Even a makeshift weapon has a good chance of going thru most of the surface area of a vest (at least that's what i've read in various reports, and after wearing one for years I'd agree). Just think about it, if that wasn't true why would they make different types of vests (ballistic vs puncture)? If you're wearing a trauma plate then that one location is probably safe. Even so, what keeps him from stabbing you in the arm, leg, crotch, neck, face, hand, foot, etc?

Now that's a different situation, I was replying about the chest. This is about a freaking broom we're talking about. Not just some extremely sharp pointed weapon.

reading comprehension 4 the win..
he snapped the broomhandle over the cops head thereby breaking it into a sharp spear...
have you not ever tried this? a broken broomhandle makes a VERY good/strong weapon..
i have no doubt it would penetrate a vest just as well as a knife..

On a side note to this point, I've decided to make a video to show this to people. I'll show the lethality of a credit card, how a piece of paper can become a stabbing weapon, and if I can find an old vest I'll try a stab thru with various weapons. Once it's done I'll put it up and link it for peeps.
 

Powermoloch

Lifer
Jul 5, 2005
10,084
4
76
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
lol, that officer is a lazy ass. He could've tackled and cuffed the kid.

And risk taking a jagged piece of wood in the chest? Not worth the risk.

Do officers were give a choice to wear Bullet resistant vests these days? Did he actually wore one during the incident?

Bullet proof isn't stab proof at all. There are two entirely different types of vests for bullets and edged/piercing weapons. Neither of those is for bashing either.


It's hard to believe that a bullet proof vest will not protect a very slow projectile that breaks upon impact (a broken broom head, assuming it is wood).

Even a makeshift weapon has a good chance of going thru most of the surface area of a vest (at least that's what i've read in various reports, and after wearing one for years I'd agree). Just think about it, if that wasn't true why would they make different types of vests (ballistic vs puncture)? If you're wearing a trauma plate then that one location is probably safe. Even so, what keeps him from stabbing you in the arm, leg, crotch, neck, face, hand, foot, etc?

Now that's a different situation, I was replying about the chest. This is about a freaking broom we're talking about. Not just some extremely sharp pointed weapon.

reading comprehension 4 the win..
he snapped the broomhandle over the cops head thereby breaking it into a sharp spear...
have you not ever tried this? a broken broomhandle makes a VERY good/strong weapon..
i have no doubt it would penetrate a vest just as well as a knife..

Read closer to the article, it said jagged edged broom handle, not a clean cut spear. In fact, we don't know how the broken broom handle look like.
 

2Dead

Senior member
Feb 19, 2005
886
1
81
Originally posted by: Willoughbyva
If his arm was broken he would be less likely/unable to use the spear as a weapon because his arm wouldn't be able to function. I know hitting him with a baton wouldn't automatically mean that his arm would be broke. Also I know there isn't much telling during an incident what someone else might do. Perhaps the police used poor judgement in this situation from the get-go?


Perry

poor judgement as a result of a concussion?
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: eits
"the cop had no choice"? wtf?? are you kidding me?

it's a 14 year old with a broken broom handle. i guess a cop doesn't go through hand-to-hand training to disarm people with weapons in their hands whatsoever. yeah, i guess he had no choice but to shoot a 15 year old boy. he couldn't have subdued the kid with a tazer or wrestled the stick away from him. he had no choice but to fire his gun at a kid with a stick in his hand.

:roll:;

oh, by the way, cops wear kevlar. wood < kevlar.

i swear, this thread is full of retards or something.
Anyone strong enough to break a broom handle over someone's head is strong enough to shank you through the neck. Your assumptions are funny: a) that the officer had Kevlar on to begin with, b) that Kevlar would stop a sharp puncture to the neck or head, c) that officer had a tazer on him, d) that officer was in any shape for hand to hand combat after having a broomstick smashed over his head, e) you believe a poor mother from the ghetto who's looking to get paid who blatantly lies and says her son "never touched the police officer".

You = born yesterday.

you = with no humanity in you


do you think a mother takes money over her own son?
Yes, anyone who makes a statement so stupid like that is just looking to get paid. Did the officer pull a "Fight Club"-esque scene by hitting himself over the head to corroborate his story? Forensics could easily expose this. This lady is insinuating that her son never touched the officer and her son was set up, which is a blatant lie. She's looking to get paid over the death of her son, the facts are the facts.
 

VooDooAddict

Golden Member
Jun 4, 2004
1,057
0
0
Originally posted by: Baked
You attack an officer, you deserve to die, period.

Deserve to die ... maybe not. However, death is a likly outcome when you attack someone who is highly trained in the use of a lethal weapon (which they also happen to carry at all times).

Unless there is a gross misrepresentation of the facts then the officer responded apropriately. The cop was already struck with a blow that could have caused serious harm or even death. Responding with excessuve force is the only way to ensure survival. I wish weould could be better as well, but this is what we have for now.
 

CVSiN

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2004
9,289
1
0
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
Originally posted by: KLin
Originally posted by: Powermoloch
lol, that officer is a lazy ass. He could've tackled and cuffed the kid.

And risk taking a jagged piece of wood in the chest? Not worth the risk.

Do officers were give a choice to wear Bullet resistant vests these days? Did he actually wore one during the incident?

Bullet proof isn't stab proof at all. There are two entirely different types of vests for bullets and edged/piercing weapons. Neither of those is for bashing either.


It's hard to believe that a bullet proof vest will not protect a very slow projectile that breaks upon impact (a broken broom head, assuming it is wood).

Even a makeshift weapon has a good chance of going thru most of the surface area of a vest (at least that's what i've read in various reports, and after wearing one for years I'd agree). Just think about it, if that wasn't true why would they make different types of vests (ballistic vs puncture)? If you're wearing a trauma plate then that one location is probably safe. Even so, what keeps him from stabbing you in the arm, leg, crotch, neck, face, hand, foot, etc?

Now that's a different situation, I was replying about the chest. This is about a freaking broom we're talking about. Not just some extremely sharp pointed weapon.

reading comprehension 4 the win..
he snapped the broomhandle over the cops head thereby breaking it into a sharp spear...
have you not ever tried this? a broken broomhandle makes a VERY good/strong weapon..
i have no doubt it would penetrate a vest just as well as a knife..

Read closer to the article, it said jagged edged broom handle, not a clean cut spear. In fact, we don't know how the broken broom handle look like.

try this mr. wizard... go get a broom.. strike it agasint a blunt object.. watch how it breaks.. it will break and leave a jagged knife like edge... or better yet webster... go look up the word JAGGED in the god forsake dictionary.. the very meaning is sharp and uneven..

man nice self pwnage dork..

 

VooDooAddict

Golden Member
Jun 4, 2004
1,057
0
0
Originally posted by: Willoughbyva
Baked: What automaticaly makes an officers life more valuable than someone elses life? I don't think if I am attacked I should have the right to kill someone else. Why should an officer be any different?


Perry

I slightly disagree.

If you are attacked, you have the right to defend yourself. If you are attacked with lethal force you are justified in using lethal force to defend yourself. The fact that you assailant may die is a regrettable result. However! I agree that it does NOT give you "the right to kill your assailant". I.E. You are not justified in dealing the person a "death blow" after incapacitating them. You do however need to stop the assault in whatever means are necessary.
 

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: eits
"the cop had no choice"? wtf?? are you kidding me?

it's a 14 year old with a broken broom handle. i guess a cop doesn't go through hand-to-hand training to disarm people with weapons in their hands whatsoever. yeah, i guess he had no choice but to shoot a 15 year old boy. he couldn't have subdued the kid with a tazer or wrestled the stick away from him. he had no choice but to fire his gun at a kid with a stick in his hand.

:roll:;

oh, by the way, cops wear kevlar. wood < kevlar.

i swear, this thread is full of retards or something.
Anyone strong enough to break a broom handle over someone's head is strong enough to shank you through the neck. Your assumptions are funny: a) that the officer had Kevlar on to begin with, b) that Kevlar would stop a sharp puncture to the neck or head, c) that officer had a tazer on him, d) that officer was in any shape for hand to hand combat after having a broomstick smashed over his head, e) you believe a poor mother from the ghetto who's looking to get paid who blatantly lies and says her son "never touched the police officer".

You = born yesterday.

me = knows that cops on call wear kevlar under their uniforms whenever they're on call... especially in a city like baltimore.

you = dumb enough to think that a 14 year old breaking a broom handle over an unsuspecting cop's head means that he's got the training and agility with a point stick to out-fight said cop who's trained in combat and disarming combatant people...
 

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: eits
"the cop had no choice"? wtf?? are you kidding me?

it's a 14 year old with a broken broom handle. i guess a cop doesn't go through hand-to-hand training to disarm people with weapons in their hands whatsoever. yeah, i guess he had no choice but to shoot a 15 year old boy. he couldn't have subdued the kid with a tazer or wrestled the stick away from him. he had no choice but to fire his gun at a kid with a stick in his hand.

:roll:;

oh, by the way, cops wear kevlar. wood < kevlar.

i swear, this thread is full of retards or something.

Yup, and you appear to be among the most retarded. Read the thread for fuller explanations of the real issues. Then go out and actually do this type of work before you think to make judgements on it.

my uncle's a cop.

cops are trained to disarm and subdue unless whenever possible. that's why there are beanbag shotguns, tasers, and other things that stop people in their tracks. most cops in urban areas carry tazers with them at all times (depending on the city laws). baltimore is one of those cities. the cop didn't use his taser to subdue the kid. instead, he reacted poorly and killed the kid. he should be found guilty for wrongful death.... it's a no brainer.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,170
18,807
146
Originally posted by: eits

you = dumb enough to think that a 14 year old breaking a broom handle over an unsuspecting cop's head means that he's got the training and agility with a point stick to out-fight said cop who's trained in combat and disarming combatant people...

Just how much self defense training do you think the average street cop has?

Also, just how effective do you think that training would be against someone who doesn't respond to pepper spray at all?

I find it simply amazing that people here don't believe the cop had the right to defend his life.
 

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: eits

you = dumb enough to think that a 14 year old breaking a broom handle over an unsuspecting cop's head means that he's got the training and agility with a point stick to out-fight said cop who's trained in combat and disarming combatant people...

Just how much self defense training do you think the average street cop has?

Also, just how effective do you think that training would be against someone who doesn't respond to pepper spray at all?

I find it simply amazing that people here don't believe the cop had the right to defend his life.

are you joking? you don't think a baltimore cop would be trained in self-defense? you don't think they'd train cops how to deal with combative people who don't respond to pepper spray or are high on pcp or drunk?

christ, you're dense.

maybe they don't teach cops how to protect themselves in your backwoods villiage, but in a major city where there's plenty of crime daily, cops go through pretty extensive training.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: eitsyou = dumb enough to think that a 14 year old breaking a broom handle over an unsuspecting cop's head means that he's got the training and agility with a point stick to out-fight said cop who's trained in combat and disarming combatant people...

uhm considering the 14 already broke the broom handle over the cops head i think he had the training (how fvcking hard is it to stab someone with a sharp object? not hard at all) and agility to either seriously hurt or kill the cop.

oh and there is a big difrence between fighting someone un-armed (wich cops are trained in) and fighting someone with a weapon.
 

NatePo717

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2005
3,392
4
81
Originally posted by: Strk
It's a shame more cops don't have those taser guns (the ones that shoot out two barbs). They work great in situations like this; that is, where the officer runs out of options of restraint and needs to use his or her weapon.

Non lethal weapons FTW!