Jeff7181
Lifer
Upgraded from a 9800 Pro that was annoying the crap outta me with driver problems.
Anyway... my first impressions... the card is heavy... big copper heatsink. I also liked how easily the card fit into my case and motherboard, just slid right in. My 9800 Pro I had to fight with a little bit, like the dimentions were off by just enough to make it a tight fit. The molex connector went in easily too, also unlike my 9800 Pro.
Once I got it installed the fun began. I had already removed the ATI drivers, so when I booted up I immediately went into safe mode and finished cleaning up the leftover ATI drivers. Rebooted and got into Windows and installed the Foreceware drivers on nvidia's site... 61.77 I believe. Rebooted again and set the resolution and color depth and refresh rates. Checked the temperature... it was reading 58-60 C at idle... pretty warm, but I guess pretty normal for these cards.
So I figured I'll put it through it's paces and run 3DMark... so I ran 2001 and got a score of about 20,000... then ran 2003 and got about 11,000. Haven't run 2005 yet or any other benchmarks... but so far I'm happy with it. I guess my PC is fairly loud to begin with, so I can't hear the difference between this card and my 9800 Pro with a VGA silencer on it. Later tonight I'll play some Doom 3 and Counter-Strike: Source and Far Cry and maybe run Aquamark and Shadermark for comparison.
Haven't tried overclocking it yet, but it's already overclocked a little bit with it's core at 370 MHz by default.
I was impressed with the quality of AA though. Vastly improved over the FX series of course... without blowing it up 1000% an analyzing pixels, I'd say the quality is exactly the same as my 9800 Pro.
I'll post back with links to benchmarks for comparison. Probably won't be able to with 2001 though because it won't let me publish them... it keeps saying some crap about CPU speed variation.
*EDIT*
Some benchmarks for ya'll. 🙂 BTW, all benchmarks are run with AA and AF at application preference unless otherwise noted.
Doom 3 @ 1024x768 with 16XAF - 67.9 FPS
3DMark2001 everything default - 20,257
3DMark2003 everything default - 11,101
3DMark2005 everything default - 3,855
More to come...
Far Cry - Ubisoft Research Demo - 103 FPS at Maximum Detail
Far Cry - PC Games Hardware Demo - 60 FPS at Maximum Detail
I tried to run Counter-Strike: Source... but they've removed the beta from Steam, so I can't run it anymore... gotta buy it, and I'm not about to do that... at least not yet.
Aquamark - 58,209
Anyway... my first impressions... the card is heavy... big copper heatsink. I also liked how easily the card fit into my case and motherboard, just slid right in. My 9800 Pro I had to fight with a little bit, like the dimentions were off by just enough to make it a tight fit. The molex connector went in easily too, also unlike my 9800 Pro.
Once I got it installed the fun began. I had already removed the ATI drivers, so when I booted up I immediately went into safe mode and finished cleaning up the leftover ATI drivers. Rebooted and got into Windows and installed the Foreceware drivers on nvidia's site... 61.77 I believe. Rebooted again and set the resolution and color depth and refresh rates. Checked the temperature... it was reading 58-60 C at idle... pretty warm, but I guess pretty normal for these cards.
So I figured I'll put it through it's paces and run 3DMark... so I ran 2001 and got a score of about 20,000... then ran 2003 and got about 11,000. Haven't run 2005 yet or any other benchmarks... but so far I'm happy with it. I guess my PC is fairly loud to begin with, so I can't hear the difference between this card and my 9800 Pro with a VGA silencer on it. Later tonight I'll play some Doom 3 and Counter-Strike: Source and Far Cry and maybe run Aquamark and Shadermark for comparison.
Haven't tried overclocking it yet, but it's already overclocked a little bit with it's core at 370 MHz by default.
I was impressed with the quality of AA though. Vastly improved over the FX series of course... without blowing it up 1000% an analyzing pixels, I'd say the quality is exactly the same as my 9800 Pro.
I'll post back with links to benchmarks for comparison. Probably won't be able to with 2001 though because it won't let me publish them... it keeps saying some crap about CPU speed variation.
*EDIT*
Some benchmarks for ya'll. 🙂 BTW, all benchmarks are run with AA and AF at application preference unless otherwise noted.
Doom 3 @ 1024x768 with 16XAF - 67.9 FPS
3DMark2001 everything default - 20,257
3DMark2003 everything default - 11,101
3DMark2005 everything default - 3,855
More to come...
Far Cry - Ubisoft Research Demo - 103 FPS at Maximum Detail
Far Cry - PC Games Hardware Demo - 60 FPS at Maximum Detail
I tried to run Counter-Strike: Source... but they've removed the beta from Steam, so I can't run it anymore... gotta buy it, and I'm not about to do that... at least not yet.
Aquamark - 58,209