Black slavery

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: blinky8225
I thought we did try indians, but they died too easily from disease. Blacks were tougher and hardier, supposedly.

slavery in the caribean (feck my spelling sucks today) was a failure with the natives. Blacks were the natural choices, as there was already a history with black slaves in the mediterreanan.

Why were they slaves?. Why didn't they refuse?

How would they refuse?

Just say "NOOOOO"
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: FleshLight
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: blinky8225
I thought we did try indians, but they died too easily from disease. Blacks were tougher and hardier, supposedly.

slavery in the caribean (feck my spelling sucks today) was a failure with the natives. Blacks were the natural choices, as there was already a history with black slaves in the mediterreanan.

Why were they slaves?. Why didn't they refuse?

How would they refuse?

He's just trolling now.

Don't call me a troll. Either give useful input to the question posed, or STFU dude.
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: PunDogg
you are retarded, how old are you 2, jeez man, you don't go into slavery willingly, you are kept captive because guys with guns, or wips are not letting you leave. Its like being in Jail no one WANTS to go to jail. Before you ask such stupid questions go read a book or something open your eyes

Dogg

Oh I am 53 years old. I did not say go into "slavery" I said they allowed themselves to be enslaved. I thinthere is a big difference between those 2 statements

trying to play your dad online is not going to get you any closers to teh s3xorZ with your mom.

Tomorrow I am betting you are going to cry 'it was my 9 year old posting'

What the f vck are you talking about?
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Well first off, indentured servatude was a contract both parties entered willingly to, but most indentured servants never became free of their masters, and almost all were abused. Indians were enslaved but they didn't work too well, too much pride ect. And most black slaves were given up by African chiefs. These chiefs would round up people and give them to European slave traders in return for money/european conviences and favor. It was not really so much "evil european uses technology to force free loving africans to become slaves" but rather "european slave traders bargined with African upper class for slaves"

No.

I love people who disagree without any proof

Me too. He has nothing worthwhile to say.
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: sonz70
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: IGBT
..slavery is a worldwide phenomenon that continues to this day..and was well established long before slaves were brought to the US by the Dixie Democrats.


Sudanese slaves await redemption in Madhol, Sudan, in December 1997. An Arab trader sold 132 former slaves, women and children, for $13,200 (in Sudanese money) to a member of Christian Solidarity International..

Text


Modern-day slaves can be found laboring as servants or concubines in Sudan, as child "carpet slaves" in India, or as cane-cutters in Haiti and southern Pakistan, to name but a few instances. According to Anti-Slavery International, the world's oldest human rights organization, there are currently over 200 million people in bondage.


The enslavement of the Dinkas in southern Sudan may be the most horrific and well-known example of contemporary slavery. According to 1993 U.S. State Department estimates, up to 90,000 blacks are owned by North African Arabs, and often sold as property in a thriving slave trade for as little as $15 per human being.


"There he found several Dinka men hobbling, their Achilles tendons cut because they refused to become Muslims."

?from an ASI report on Sudanese slavery

Shackled laborers in Pakistan


Many of the bonded laborers are shackled in leg-irons in Pakistan. Though much of the debt these cane-harvesters have incurred is real, the practice of exchanging human labor for landowners' loans is illegal.

In a 1992 law passed by the Pakistani government, landlords are barred from offering loans in exchange for work or to hold workers hostage to their debts. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan has freed approximately 7,500 bonded laborers since 1995.

By the commission's estimates, there are still roughly 50,000 bonded laborers in southern Singh. Many of those freed now reside in the city of Hyderabad in makeshift camps. Most are afraid to return to their homeland, however, for fear they will be recaptured and enslaved again.


Beyond the Emancipation Proclamation


Accounts of human beings as modern slaves extend beyond those described here, and include young girls sold into prostitution in Thailand and slave chattels in Mauritania. Though most Americans believe slavery was abolished with the Emancipation Proclamation more than a century ago, the horrors of human beings held in bondage flourishes today.

I am talking about yhis country O. K.

Answer me this. What would I have to do to you to get you to be my slave. What would I have to threaten you with? You just say no. Why didn't they. A woman once tried to make me lick her ass when I was a child of 5 and I refused. I was beaten fot it but I would not lick her asshole no matter what. It would have been impossible for her to make me lick her asshole on my own power.

I'm sure that happened to you.

Why would I lie? Just out of the blue I make some stupid thing like that up. Whatever. It happened. And I am still sane i think
 

sonz70

Banned
Apr 19, 2005
3,693
1
0
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: sonz70
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: IGBT
..slavery is a worldwide phenomenon that continues to this day..and was well established long before slaves were brought to the US by the Dixie Democrats.


Sudanese slaves await redemption in Madhol, Sudan, in December 1997. An Arab trader sold 132 former slaves, women and children, for $13,200 (in Sudanese money) to a member of Christian Solidarity International..

Text


Modern-day slaves can be found laboring as servants or concubines in Sudan, as child "carpet slaves" in India, or as cane-cutters in Haiti and southern Pakistan, to name but a few instances. According to Anti-Slavery International, the world's oldest human rights organization, there are currently over 200 million people in bondage.


The enslavement of the Dinkas in southern Sudan may be the most horrific and well-known example of contemporary slavery. According to 1993 U.S. State Department estimates, up to 90,000 blacks are owned by North African Arabs, and often sold as property in a thriving slave trade for as little as $15 per human being.


"There he found several Dinka men hobbling, their Achilles tendons cut because they refused to become Muslims."

?from an ASI report on Sudanese slavery

Shackled laborers in Pakistan


Many of the bonded laborers are shackled in leg-irons in Pakistan. Though much of the debt these cane-harvesters have incurred is real, the practice of exchanging human labor for landowners' loans is illegal.

In a 1992 law passed by the Pakistani government, landlords are barred from offering loans in exchange for work or to hold workers hostage to their debts. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan has freed approximately 7,500 bonded laborers since 1995.

By the commission's estimates, there are still roughly 50,000 bonded laborers in southern Singh. Many of those freed now reside in the city of Hyderabad in makeshift camps. Most are afraid to return to their homeland, however, for fear they will be recaptured and enslaved again.


Beyond the Emancipation Proclamation


Accounts of human beings as modern slaves extend beyond those described here, and include young girls sold into prostitution in Thailand and slave chattels in Mauritania. Though most Americans believe slavery was abolished with the Emancipation Proclamation more than a century ago, the horrors of human beings held in bondage flourishes today.

I am talking about yhis country O. K.

Answer me this. What would I have to do to you to get you to be my slave. What would I have to threaten you with? You just say no. Why didn't they. A woman once tried to make me lick her ass when I was a child of 5 and I refused. I was beaten fot it but I would not lick her asshole no matter what. It would have been impossible for her to make me lick her asshole on my own power.

I'm sure that happened to you.

Why would I lie? Just out of the blue I make some stupid thing like that up. Whatever. It happened. And I am still sane i think


You would make something like that up to try and get a point across. The point you made was good enough, you did not need to overexagerate it with something no one would belive.
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Well first off, indentured servatude was a contract both parties entered willingly to, but most indentured servants never became free of their masters, and almost all were abused. Indians were enslaved but they didn't work too well, too much pride ect. And most black slaves were given up by African chiefs. These chiefs would round up people and give them to European slave traders in return for money/european conviences and favor. It was not really so much "evil european uses technology to force free loving africans to become slaves" but rather "european slave traders bargined with African upper class for slaves"

No.

I love people who disagree without any proof

I'm not here to teach you history but you can start here:
http://www.innercity.org/holt/slavechron.html

then move on to googling what was actually involved in slave trade...........

Yuor missing the point. Why did they not refuse."Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death". Do those words mean nothing to you.
 

sonz70

Banned
Apr 19, 2005
3,693
1
0
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Well first off, indentured servatude was a contract both parties entered willingly to, but most indentured servants never became free of their masters, and almost all were abused. Indians were enslaved but they didn't work too well, too much pride ect. And most black slaves were given up by African chiefs. These chiefs would round up people and give them to European slave traders in return for money/european conviences and favor. It was not really so much "evil european uses technology to force free loving africans to become slaves" but rather "european slave traders bargined with African upper class for slaves"

No.

I love people who disagree without any proof

I'm not here to teach you history but you can start here:
http://www.innercity.org/holt/slavechron.html

then move on to googling what was actually involved in slave trade...........

Yuor missing the point. Why did they not refuse."Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death". Do those words mean nothing to you.

Different mindset of people back than, the same as people in med-evil times allowed to be lil more than pawns in whatever the nobles wanted. They became slaves, because they were told to.

 

yepmetoo

Banned
Jul 24, 2005
35
0
0
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Well first off, indentured servatude was a contract both parties entered willingly to, but most indentured servants never became free of their masters, and almost all were abused. Indians were enslaved but they didn't work too well, too much pride ect. And most black slaves were given up by African chiefs. These chiefs would round up people and give them to European slave traders in return for money/european conviences and favor. It was not really so much "evil european uses technology to force free loving africans to become slaves" but rather "european slave traders bargined with African upper class for slaves"

No.

I love people who disagree without any proof

Me too. He has nothing worthwhile to say.

OK worthwhile.

Indentured servitude was not necassarily agreed on by both parties.
Originally many slaves were given freedom at the age of 25.
Life long servitude was introduces later on with the agricultural south and to prevent slaves from using the legal system.

Too much pride was not the problem with Indian slaves. "Though the issue is complex, the unsuitability of Native Americans for the labor intensive agricultural practices, their susceptibility to European diseases, the proximity of avenues of escape for Native Americans, and the lucrative nature of the African slave trade led to a transition to an African based institution of slavery"

"Evil Europeans" did in fact give technology to Africans to meet the demand for slaves.

 

Rebasxer

Golden Member
Apr 10, 2005
1,270
2
0
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Well first off, indentured servatude was a contract both parties entered willingly to, but most indentured servants never became free of their masters, and almost all were abused. Indians were enslaved but they didn't work too well, too much pride ect. And most black slaves were given up by African chiefs. These chiefs would round up people and give them to European slave traders in return for money/european conviences and favor. It was not really so much "evil european uses technology to force free loving africans to become slaves" but rather "european slave traders bargined with African upper class for slaves"

No.

I love people who disagree without any proof

I'm not here to teach you history but you can start here:
http://www.innercity.org/holt/slavechron.html

then move on to googling what was actually involved in slave trade...........

Text

Go to the Library and read chapter 2 of that book, I'll trust a real historian over some community activist named eddie becker.

Oh, and most of the sources that guy cites don't lead anywhere...
 

yepmetoo

Banned
Jul 24, 2005
35
0
0
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Well first off, indentured servatude was a contract both parties entered willingly to, but most indentured servants never became free of their masters, and almost all were abused. Indians were enslaved but they didn't work too well, too much pride ect. And most black slaves were given up by African chiefs. These chiefs would round up people and give them to European slave traders in return for money/european conviences and favor. It was not really so much "evil european uses technology to force free loving africans to become slaves" but rather "european slave traders bargined with African upper class for slaves"

No.

I love people who disagree without any proof

I'm not here to teach you history but you can start here:
http://www.innercity.org/holt/slavechron.html

then move on to googling what was actually involved in slave trade...........

Yuor missing the point. Why did they not refuse."Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death". Do those words mean nothing to you.

I would give you death.....does life mean nothing to you? FYI many did refuse......
 

FleshLight

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2004
6,883
0
71
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: FleshLight
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: blinky8225
I thought we did try indians, but they died too easily from disease. Blacks were tougher and hardier, supposedly.

slavery in the caribean (feck my spelling sucks today) was a failure with the natives. Blacks were the natural choices, as there was already a history with black slaves in the mediterreanan.

Why were they slaves?. Why didn't they refuse?

How would they refuse?

He's just trolling now.

Don't call me a troll. Either give useful input to the question posed, or STFU dude.

Alright kid, back then, the Africans had no idea where they were going or what they would be subjected to in the "new world". It was be a slave or die, and since they didn't know that living would be an arguably worser (too lazy to find a proper word) fate than death, they chose life. You see, Africans, like all humans, have this thing called survival instinct.
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
becuz we thought they were inferior. it seemed perfectly rational at the time. even those against slavery mostly didn't think they were equal. heck indians owned blacks. and long before blacks got to play on our baseball teams we let indians play...

We?(I wasn't born until 1953..I never owned a slave how about you?) I think you mean the people who had slaves thought they were inferior. So . How does that explain slaves allowing these people to enslave them.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,665
440
126
Here's what I remember...

Slave labor, which means FORCED LABOR without restitution of any form.

Look it up on wikipedia

Some nice info is found form Wikipedia, but there are volumes and volumes of information out there on this subject. Take note, Wikipedia talks about North America imported slave labor and where it came from. Wiki gives mainly info regarding the black slavery in north america, not the entire slave history.

Indentured servitude, debtors works, and other means of "coercision" are deemed SLAVE LABOR. It is forcing someone to work against their will to do so without paying them back in some way.

Black slavery in America was after YEARS of other forms of slavery. The first slaves were either the the North American Indians, or indentured Irish settlers.

Later, people from many different nationalities became slaves at one point in America. However, there was a problem, either A) they resisted too much or B) escaped too much. The problem with having a WHITE irish slave in a white society is if the slave escapes, there isn't any easy method of tracking him/her down again.

However, slave traders that dealt in America, learned from slave traders in the middle east who use black african slaves. These guys are the ORIGINAL slave dealers, who enslaved hebrews, jews, and just about any other humans culture not of their society.

They were making the slaves more pliable by working on certain cultural influences to many south African tribes who all were very warlike in nature. Many tribes were in direct competition for food, hunting grounds, farm land, and females. Some of them just liked to fight for any reason period. Using this animosity, middle eastern and north african slave traders would use one tribe to help capture another or use greedy individuals of a tribe, usually the elder or leader of that tribe, to sell off the rest of his tribe to them.

The American slave traders found out, found a way to make a nice route across the Atlantic, and also saw the added bonus of Blacks being very visible in a white society.

At first, slave traders didn't think Blacks were NON HUMAN, just merely savages. It came from dealings, and with many tribes being REALLY REALLY REALLY DUMB, that led to a change of thinking. Give the chief of a tribe a worthless shiny trinket and he'll give you any member of his tribe to take along. Willingly because they were told by the elder. That lack of morals, and intelligence led whites to think that maybe black people weren't people at all. Yes, there were more reasons then just this, but it is also a prevelant reason as to why white people changed their view of black people from savages to sub-humans. Part of it was also interactions that came from dealing with the American "savage" natives. That, and their technological advantage and wealth they had over anyone else kept twisting their views more and more.

Another reasons to use blacks, is that America was expanding, by pushing off natives from the land and usually killing them in the process. This led to HUGE tracks of land (hehe monty reference but without the sex context) to be owned by people with no one to work them. Blacks in Africa were plenty, and easy to obtain. Hence, the sudden influx as them used as slaves.

Blacks were NOT the only slaves, just the easiest and most plentiful to obtain. Which led to more black slaves in America then any other type.
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: blinky8225
I thought we did try indians, but they died too easily from disease. Blacks were tougher and hardier, supposedly.

Whose We?
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
I don't get it. The way I see it is...the only way you can enslave someone is if they accept that condition willingly. I guess I don't understand how only blacks were enslaved in this country and not other races ...such as the "Indians",chinese,south americans,etc. I find this very difficult to understand. Why blacks?
They were easier to catch?

Aparently they were.
 

FleshLight

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2004
6,883
0
71
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: blinky8225
I thought we did try indians, but they died too easily from disease. Blacks were tougher and hardier, supposedly.

Whose We?

We as in America and Americans, the country that a majority of the posters here live in.
 

EyeMNathan

Banned
Feb 15, 2004
1,078
0
0
Originally posted by: ManyBeers
Originally posted by: blinky8225
I thought we did try indians, but they died too easily from disease. Blacks were tougher and hardier, supposedly.

Whose We?


QFT.

Apparently some people like to lump themselves in with the slaveholding moral garbage of the 19th century. My ancestors during the time of slavery in the US were living in Germany, so 'we' certainly isn't me or my family.
 

yepmetoo

Banned
Jul 24, 2005
35
0
0
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Well first off, indentured servatude was a contract both parties entered willingly to, but most indentured servants never became free of their masters, and almost all were abused. Indians were enslaved but they didn't work too well, too much pride ect. And most black slaves were given up by African chiefs. These chiefs would round up people and give them to European slave traders in return for money/european conviences and favor. It was not really so much "evil european uses technology to force free loving africans to become slaves" but rather "european slave traders bargined with African upper class for slaves"

No.

I love people who disagree without any proof

I'm not here to teach you history but you can start here:
http://www.innercity.org/holt/slavechron.html

then move on to googling what was actually involved in slave trade...........

Text

Go to the Library and read chapter 2 of that book, I'll trust a real historian over some community activist named eddie becker.

Oh, and most of the sources that guy cites don't lead anywhere...

You are free too look up the sources. Bad links are not that uncommon......

Howard Zinn is a historian?
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Chadder007
Consider this.....slavery still exists in America and people are profitting off of using them in forced labor. (Illegal Aliens)

How is that slavery? They come here willingly, knowing that they will not be able to get legal jobs because they're illegal. Oh, and they get paid. Very little by our standards, sure, but slaves are not paid at all.

lol yea. they trek through the desert running towards slavery lol:p they do it cuz even with low wages its MORE THEN THEY GET IN MEXICO!! most send money back to mexico...why is that if its worthless? mexico is highly reliant on the massive flow of money sent back.

Exactly.
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: Auryg
Originally posted by: classy
Originally posted by: paulney
Can you clarify that 'they are the loudest about it' part? Takes a sip of root beer calmly

I haven't heard lately of chinese claiming reparations for the slavery of their ancestors. Have you?

Every race that was enslaved on this planet were paid reparartions of some kind except for 'ding ding', blacks from America. Germany paid, China paid as well. So you are misinformed


That sure is funny, I don't remember getting my reparations.

Good point.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: EyeMNathan

QFT.

Apparently some people like to lump themselves in with the slaveholding moral garbage of the 19th century. My ancestors during the time of slavery in the US were living in Germany, so 'we' certainly isn't me or my family.

Yet they came here?
 

Rebasxer

Golden Member
Apr 10, 2005
1,270
2
0
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Originally posted by: yepmetoo
Originally posted by: Rebasxer
Well first off, indentured servatude was a contract both parties entered willingly to, but most indentured servants never became free of their masters, and almost all were abused. Indians were enslaved but they didn't work too well, too much pride ect. And most black slaves were given up by African chiefs. These chiefs would round up people and give them to European slave traders in return for money/european conviences and favor. It was not really so much "evil european uses technology to force free loving africans to become slaves" but rather "european slave traders bargined with African upper class for slaves"

No.

I love people who disagree without any proof

I'm not here to teach you history but you can start here:
http://www.innercity.org/holt/slavechron.html

then move on to googling what was actually involved in slave trade...........

Text

Go to the Library and read chapter 2 of that book, I'll trust a real historian over some community activist named eddie becker.

Oh, and most of the sources that guy cites don't lead anywhere...

You are free too look up the sources. Bad links are not that uncommon......

Howard Zinn is a historian?

He has a Ph.D. in History from Columbia and taught at serveral colleges. That probably makes him a historian
 

ManyBeers

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2004
2,519
1
81
Originally posted by: sonz7/Q]

Why would I lie? Just out of the blue I make some stupid thing like that up. Whatever. It happened. And I am still sane i think



You would make something like that up to try and get a point across. The point you made was good enough, you did not need to overexagerate it with something no one would belive.
[/quote]

No I would not.