cytg111
Lifer
- Mar 17, 2008
- 26,232
- 15,641
- 136
Trump is pushing for the next and final march to the capitol
Really anyone that thinks he is the rightfully elected president in the 2020 election is just ignorant of the implications of their assertion. You'd think these "patriots" would have read and comprehended the document they profess to love so much. Amendment 22:Republicans claiming that Biden called them all out is pure nonsense. But anyone who thinks that TFG is the rightfully elected President in the 2020 election is obviously a MAGGAT and deserves to be called out.
(emphasis added)No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.
Nice. Reminds me of a great scene from POTC:Really anyone that thinks he is the rightfully elected president in the 2020 election is just ignorant of the implications of their assertion. You'd think these "patriots" would have read and comprehended the document they profess to love so much. Amendment 22:
(emphasis added)
Notice that it specifically says "elected", not "served." If they want to contend that he won in 2020 that only means that he can never be elected again without regard to the fact that he never served that term.
What would you call it then when a political party clearly and unambiguously loses an election and then the leader of that party attempts to overturn the results to make him win anyway?Nope. Don't believe it for a second.
What they did was question the integrity of the voting process. That's happened in the past, and will happen again. The real question here is, did it change the outcome of the election? We both know the answer to that.What would you call it then when a political party clearly and unambiguously loses an election and then the leader of that party attempts to overturn the results to make him win anyway?
While it’s true that they lied about questioning the integrity of the voting process, what they actually did was create slates of fake electoral college electors and tried every method possible to get the VP to throw out lawful ones and replace them with their fake ones to illegally seize power. Also known as a coup.What they did was question the integrity of the voting process. That's happened in the past, and will happen again. The real question here is, did it change the outcome of the election? We both know the answer to that.
Uhmmm, yes, there was an armed insurrection where Republicans attempted to capture or kill our elected leaders to overturn the election. It was on TV. Did you miss it?Did we have months of rioting after the election? Were city's burned? Was there armed insurrection and looting? What we had were questions blown out of proportion to generate likes and clicks. All sorts of people just love to fire up the sub 100 IQ crowd.
No. And if all they had done was question the process nobody would have cared. Instead they tried a coup and attempted to capture or kill our elected leaders.Is questioning the process illegal?
Looks like they will be charged soon as numerous fake electors have been informed they are targets of a grand jury investigation.Have those fake electors been charged with a crime? If they broke the law they need to face the consequences, I'm all for that course of action. Was there intent to throw the results of the election, or was it a matter of moving forward based on information/advice they had at the time?
I don’t believe the vast majority of Republicans want to overthrow our democratic form of government either. This does not change the fact that Republicans did attempt to overthrow our democratic form of government and they did so at the urging of the head of the Republican Party.Headlines are a fine thing, but it's rare that they tell the entire story. You're trying to convince me of a condition that I don't believe exists. I don't believe the vast majority of republican's want to overthrow our democratic form of government. Quite the opposite actually.
Why won't the leaders of this glorious Republican party make statements disassociating themselves with what happened on Jan. 6th. They almost universally have not. There is your answer.No. And if all they had done was question the process nobody would have cared. Instead they tried a coup and attempted to capture or kill our elected leaders.
Looks like they will be charged soon as numerous fake electors have been informed they are targets of a grand jury investigation.
Regardless yes, there was undeniable intent to throw the results of the election. They moved forward with slates of electors that did not comply with the law. Then Republicans tried to get those fake electors counted instead of the real ones so they could illegally seize power.
This was a coup attempt.
I don’t believe the vast majority of Republicans want to overthrow our democratic form of government either. This does not change the fact that Republicans did attempt to overthrow our democratic form of government and they did so at the urging of the head of the Republican Party.
We need principled conservatives to abandon the party that attempted a coup and join liberals in defeating them. I think we both agree that democracy is more important than any public policy and the Republican Party in its current form represents a direct threat to democracy.
What they did was question the integrity of the voting process. That's happened in the past, and will happen again. The real question here is, did it change the outcome of the election? We both know the answer to that.
Did we have months of rioting after the election? Were city's burned? Was there armed insurrection and looting? What we had were questions blown out of proportion to generate likes and clicks. All sorts of people just love to fire up the sub 100 IQ crowd.
I don't believe the vast majority of republican's want to overthrow our democratic form of government. Quite the opposite actually.
We are no longer 'we the people' we are 'me me me oh look a squirrel'.
Ask yourself what it would cost you to be able to come to believe that fskimospy is right? Imagine if he sees what he sees not out of a political bias or some misaligned moral premise but because he is an honest and decent person who has, just like you, to believe and advocate for the truth he sees.Is questioning the process illegal? Have those fake electors been charged with a crime? If they broke the law they need to face the consequences, I'm all for that course of action. Was there intent to throw the results of the election, or was it a matter of moving forward based on information/advice they had at the time?
Headlines are a fine thing, but it's rare that they tell the entire story. You're trying to convince me of a condition that I don't believe exists. I don't believe the vast majority of republican's want to overthrow our democratic form of government. Quite the opposite actually.
This was a coup attempt.
In Texas, a county elections administrator and her two deputies have resigned, with at least one citing threats fueled by misinformation, as former President Donald Trump and his supporters continue to spread baseless claims about the 2020 election.
"The threats against election officials and my election staff, dangerous misinformation, lack of full time personnel for the elections office, unpaid compensation, and absurd legislation have completely changed the job I initially accepted," now-former Gillespie County Elections Administrator Anissa Herrera reportedly wrote in her resignation letter, dated Aug. 2.
