Okay, so you do care. Now you know how to stop it. (of course you've always known how to stop it, but as I said before I think you are more interested in fighting than anything else)
Give it up. You only do it for 'BHO'. Not JRB (Joe Robinette Biden), JSM (John Sidney McCain, or SLHP (Sarah Louise Heath Palin). Just Barack HUSSEIN Obama. I can see abbreviating Bush as GWB because the only thing distinguishing him (GWB) from his father (GHWB) is their middle names. Spin it all you want with your innocent pretending but you don't have a leg to stand on and you're not fooling anyone.
As far as the OP, apparently Biden's version isn't 100% factual. What are you looking for? 'Got us'? Ok, fine. Now let's talk about McCain misrepresenting Obama's sex ed plan or health care plan or whatever. Both sides have been doing it the entire campaign. Just look at FactCheck.org. In short, your thread isn't new and it isn't news.
m1ldslide1
Platinum Member
- Feb 20, 2006
- 2,321
- 0
- 0
Skitzer
Diamond Member
- Mar 20, 2000
- 4,414
- 3
- 81
Seems to me like CADsortaGUY struck a nerve here. The post is legitimate and true in my opinion and all I see are people attacking him. Why can't you people stay on topic ........ ummmm, nevermind, you all obviously have nothing to counter the subject with so ...... flame on!
They can't.
All they gots is Attack-Attack-Attack.
They are fighting with 30 year old Atwater Tools - and don't understand why the more they attack, the wider Obama's lead becomes .... America moved on and the GOP wheels are stuck in a ditch.
A hateful one at that ...
Cad? Have you ever read the Obama/Biden plan for Iraq? It sure doesn't seem like you have.
The withdrawal will be directed by military commanders on the ground and in consulation with the Iraq government. That sure sounds like a withdrawal plan based on the ground conditions to me, but feel free to continue misrepresenting it.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/iraq/
The withdrawal will be directed by military commanders on the ground and in consulation with the Iraq government. That sure sounds like a withdrawal plan based on the ground conditions to me, but feel free to continue misrepresenting it.
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/iraq/
CSG represents mere semantics as some sort of honest distinction. they're not.
Bush agrees to a "general time horizon", subject to conditions.
Obama wants a "timetable", subject to conditions.
Cover the difference between the two statements with your pinkie finger.
McCain still seeks to find a definition of "Victory" that will allow us to stay until we get it, whatever it is.
Bush still wants permanent US bases in Iraq, and a sweetheart deal for American Oil. As likely does McCain. The vague offer of a general time horizon is a carrot for the Iraqis. The Iraqis have no intention of agreeing to any such thing, so they'll just stall until they see the results of the US elections.
The Bush Admin will be lucky to get an interim agreement for troops to stay long enough to negotiate an agreement with the next admin. Yeh, sure, they'll stay anyway, but lack of an agreement puts the pressure on the US, not the Iraqis...
BHO? Codespeak, to let the rabid right reader know that the poster is one of them... kinda like "Democrat Party", "Dred Scott", "States Rights", "Values", "Welfare Queens", "Law and Order", "Silent Majority", "Death Tax" and a whole lot more...
Bush agrees to a "general time horizon", subject to conditions.
Obama wants a "timetable", subject to conditions.
Cover the difference between the two statements with your pinkie finger.
McCain still seeks to find a definition of "Victory" that will allow us to stay until we get it, whatever it is.
Bush still wants permanent US bases in Iraq, and a sweetheart deal for American Oil. As likely does McCain. The vague offer of a general time horizon is a carrot for the Iraqis. The Iraqis have no intention of agreeing to any such thing, so they'll just stall until they see the results of the US elections.
The Bush Admin will be lucky to get an interim agreement for troops to stay long enough to negotiate an agreement with the next admin. Yeh, sure, they'll stay anyway, but lack of an agreement puts the pressure on the US, not the Iraqis...
BHO? Codespeak, to let the rabid right reader know that the poster is one of them... kinda like "Democrat Party", "Dred Scott", "States Rights", "Values", "Welfare Queens", "Law and Order", "Silent Majority", "Death Tax" and a whole lot more...
JD50
Lifer
- Sep 4, 2005
- 11,925
- 2,908
- 136
Honest question here. Do conservatives get this worked up over such trivial stuff? I'm asking because obviously I'm a conservative, so I'm a little biased and might not notice when we get this petty. Can someone give me an example of conservatives being this hypersensitive over things like this? I'd like to know so that I avoid looking as juvenile and petty as Jhhnn and the rest of the BHO crybabies look.
No. They get worked up about other trivial stuff, like the color of a candidate's skin or their middle name is a great indicator of someone's patriotism, or that a candidate's belief in anything other than their own ooga booga deity means squat about their ethics, morals or integrity, or that the gender of someone's love interest is any of their fucking business.
Fern
Elite Member
- Sep 30, 2003
- 26,907
- 174
- 106
I don't understand, or agree with, the handwringing over the use of Obama's middle name.
It is what it is. (And not like his 1st and last names are as common as *John* and *Smith* anyway)
If being a Muslim is not a *bad thing*, why should any on the left act like it is? That's all it looks like when one these freal-out episodes errupt over the use of it or his full initials.
If anyone feels there is unfair stigma attached to such names, you ain't solving that by making it an offense to use it. It'll be solved when it's used so much no one bats an eyelash or gives it a second thought. Which, BTW, was where that was firmly headed given all the nonchalance over such names (lot's of pro-athletes and other people in the news have such names) until you guys started this stuff.
Fern
It is what it is. (And not like his 1st and last names are as common as *John* and *Smith* anyway)
If being a Muslim is not a *bad thing*, why should any on the left act like it is? That's all it looks like when one these freal-out episodes errupt over the use of it or his full initials.
If anyone feels there is unfair stigma attached to such names, you ain't solving that by making it an offense to use it. It'll be solved when it's used so much no one bats an eyelash or gives it a second thought. Which, BTW, was where that was firmly headed given all the nonchalance over such names (lot's of pro-athletes and other people in the news have such names) until you guys started this stuff.
Fern
It's like calling a Mexican a Mexican and a Jew a Jew. There is a right way to say it and a wrong way. Guess which way the righties are using Hussein.
Or, I could continue to do as I please regarding BHO and you over sensitive types can stop trying to derail threads with it.
If you don't like how I post don't read my posts or respond to them...
The "hand wringing" part is over regarding Obama and this election. The luddites still supporting McCain long ago wore out the effectiveness of the tactic, except among their fellow luddites so, by itself, it's no longer an issue.
The good news for most Americans, and the bad part for that subgroup of Republicans, is that it just confirms and reinforces their image of as the bigots they are.
Or, I could continue to do as I please regarding BHO and you over sensitive types can stop trying to derail threads with it.
If you don't like how I post don't read my posts or respond to them...
Wrong, I've used RP(perot), RP2(paul), and SP(palin). I've also used GWB. But even if I didn't it wouldn't change a thing because it doesn't matter what you think I do it for. I've told you morons why - you just can't accept it because it doesn't fit into your little stereotypes.
But to your statement on Biden's lie - I'm glad you addressed the topic(finally) and admitted that Biden wasn't truthful. It's a step in the right direction.
Exactly. They don't want to address the topic so they try to rage on and on about "BHO". Hell, I even tried to give them a place to "rage" but only certain threads are allowed here I guess. I'm still trying to figure it out but can't get any answers.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter