SpatiallyAware
Lifer
- Sep 7, 2009
- 12,960
- 3
- 0
Yes, that would be rude. But that's not what's happening here, which is why I pointed out that crucial context was missing. A cyclist is part of the flow of traffic, unless your local laws state otherwise. In the scenario SA laid out, a cyclist is entitled and encouraged to hold his lane for safety purposes. There's nothing rude whatsoever about making sure some impatient self-important twit behind him makes a LEGAL pass that's safe for EVERYONE. For the same reasons you don't veer right in a car to assist someone else in a pass, neither does a cyclist. As others pointed out, I'm only going 15 MPH anyway. Passing me is a breeze. You just have to be willing to sacrifice a couple seconds of your life to not be rude yourself.
A ciclist going 15mph in a 45mph, holding up 20+ cars, is in no way 'in the flow of traffic.'
You need to realize that reality is outside the bounds of the law. The reality is that you're a selfish, obnoxious, rude, hindrance. A legal one, sure, but just like my list.... Legal doesn't make it right.
I don't believe anyone has an issue with bicyclists hugging the side, where they belong, and who are not blocking traffic.
The issue is primarily on 2-lane roads, when they hold up a lane of traffic intentionally blocking any passing, and refusing to pull over when there's room to allow traffic to pass.