• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Beyond zen 6

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
From AMD's own financial statements, the Client ASP increase for the entire year was 31%. That was this year... who knows what further increases it'll be when Zen 7 comes out.

Not sure where it's coming from. Prices have been steady over the past year.

no trust me they're not gonna do ASP hikes because...
...because I said so,

That's rich coming from you. Everything you say is "trust me bro" thrown in with a bit of "pay me" every now and then.

But I'm out before this gets any worse. I'll just leave it with I expect prices will go up due to it being 3+ years away and the larger CCD. But not to the levels you are claiming (and claimed about Zen 5).
 
From AMD's own financial statements, the Client ASP increase for the entire year was 31%.
But that does not say how the price for the different SKUs has changed. It's not like the 9800X3D has gone up in price for example.

Could be that people are just buying higher performing SKUs which cost more. E.g. going for 9950X3D instead of 9800X3D.
 
But that does not say how the price for the different SKUs has changed. It's not like the 9800X3D has gone up in price for example.

Could be that people are just buying higher performing SKUs which cost more. E.g. going for 9950X3D instead of 9800X3D.

I actually looked up that model when I saw the ASP thing.


Pretty much flat over the past year.
 
Not sure where it's coming from. Prices have been steady over the past year.
The ASP rises even if the proportion of expensive products in sales figures increases.

I don't understand all the discussion about Zen 7 prices. AMD can set whatever price it wants. However, that doesn't mean that many people will buy at the price AMD wants, and if the sales figures aren't right... AMD offered discounts on Zen 4 pretty quickly.

And that's why the price isn't determined by the costs, but by what buyers are willing to pay for it. It's not rocket science, but rather the basics that every salesperson knows.
 
This has nothing to do with individual SKU pricing and everything with semis economics being dung.
Intel's the same camp (worse, really, bLLC is a 2D slab of N2) anyway.
They are going to have the margin for packing and the rest of the die but that 2D Slab is worrying if they mess it up also on this cost per xtor is going up as process shrinks cause you need to do more for less gains
 
Yeah man, whatever you say.
How's that 5.1 on PTL doing? Why are the margins 35% on 18A ramp?

N2 isn't "mega expensive", it just costs more.
2.5D substrate also costs more.
New cIOD (on a newer node) also costs more. It all adds up.
Moreso for Zen7 which is A14.

Is V-Cache die staying of N6 or also moving to newer node?
 
ehhh.
Zen6 alone is 2 nodes of money + packaging cost addr + new moremoney cIOD.
Zen7 compounds on that with A14 so prices will just go up and up.

It's the reason most laptop segments are becoming increasingly hard to live in. DIY can tolerate mass ASP hikes. Laptop can't; OEM opmargins are razor thin as is.

Binning will help keep the price under control. So will competitive pressure.

AMD will charge as much as they think they can get away with, however.

If Intel Nova Lake is unexpectedly competitive, we won’t see much change.

What some folks need to prepare for is the top dawg chip 24c/48t) creating a new price tier if Intel is uncompetitive or they don’t charge premium for the rumored 16+32 part.

…and yes, people are willing to pay big bucks for a top tier chip. Just like they do for GPUs. I imagine anything under $1,500 would sell, provided the performance is there.

Past history has shown that most folks buying top tier aren’t price sensitive.
 
This has nothing to do with individual SKU pricing and everything with semis economics being dung.
Intel's the same camp (worse, really, bLLC is a 2D slab of N2) anyway.
The semis can invent whatever price, but if too high consumers will not pay. They will stay on much cheaper previous gen instead. Most will not pay 100% more (based on your prediction) to get approx 10% more perf.

Things may be different for the AI Datacenter bubble companies with unlimited wallets, until the bubble pops.
 
From AMD's own financial statements, the Client ASP increase for the entire year was 31%. That was this year... who knows what further increases it'll be when Zen 7 comes out.
That s mainly due to the 9800X3D, since it launched late in 2024 it had low financial footprint for 2024 but a full year of sales in 2025 was enough to increase the global ASP y/y.
 
The semis can invent whatever price, but if too high consumers will not pay. They will stay on much cheaper previous gen instead. Most will not pay 100% more (based on your prediction) to get approx 10% more perf.

Things may be different for the AI Datacenter bubble companies with unlimited wallets, until the bubble pops.
Do not interpret your own financial comfort zones to be universal. Many of us will happily pay as much as needed for high end performance.
 
Is V-Cache die staying of N6 or also moving to newer node?

There's not really that much benefit to going smaller in terms of SRAM cell density. Might help latency a bit, but shaving a few cycles of latency off an L3 isn't that big of a win.

I suppose the price difference between N6 and N4 wafers isn't all that large though. So they might but it isn't going to make all that much difference either way.
 
Back
Top