Best make of printers....in your honest opinion

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

AgaBoogaBoo

Lifer
Feb 16, 2003
26,108
5
81
I don't know about those 3 in 1 printers, but I like most HP B&W Laser printers, which is what I would reccomend
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,651
100
91
epson makes some outstanding high end printers, but i like the value and quality of canons.
 

slpaulson

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2000
4,412
13
81
Canon
Their ink is much cheaper, plus you can get generic ink which is even cheaper than Canon ink.
 

nsafreak

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 2001
7,093
3
81
Personally I'd go with separate printer/scanner than a combo unit. If you really want a combo I'd go with an Epson CX5400. Otherwise I'd recommend getting a HP LaserJet 4 off eBay for your text printing and stuff that doesn't have to be color and an Epson or Canon inkjet for when you do need color. Scanners again I recommend Epson I really like the Perfection 1670 that I have.
 

jadinolf

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
20,952
3
81
Originally posted by: randal
HP laser printers -rock- ... their inkjets are now crap just like everybody else's.

True. My 660Cse which I bought in November of 1995 is still working flawlessly. What a piece of crap.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,700
10,179
146
Originally posted by: jadinolf
Originally posted by: randal
HP laser printers -rock- ... their inkjets are now crap just like everybody else's.

True. My 660Cse which I bought in November of 1995 is still working flawlessly. What a piece of crap.
Your 660Cse was built back when HP inkjets were built to the same standard of quality as their lasers. No more. They've come right back to the pack.

I vote HP for a B/W laser workhorse and Canon for inkjet color.

 
Aug 27, 2002
10,043
2
0
I can't believe hp is winning this pole :shocked: I thought you where all geeks here. Epson prints better, (typically) faster, and costs less per page due to thier better ink technologies, and from my experiance even last longer (page count wise)
 

jadinolf

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
20,952
3
81
Originally posted by: lobadobadingdong
I can't believe hp is winning this pole :shocked: I thought you where all geeks here. Epson prints better, (typically) faster, and costs less per page due to thier better ink technologies, and from my experiance even last longer (page count wise)

I have 4 HPs and all about the same age. 660Cse, 672 (2 of them) and 692. Nice thing is that they all use the same ink cartridges.
 
Aug 27, 2002
10,043
2
0
Originally posted by: jadinolf
Originally posted by: lobadobadingdong
I can't believe hp is winning this pole :shocked: I thought you where all geeks here. Epson prints better, (typically) faster, and costs less per page due to thier better ink technologies, and from my experiance even last longer (page count wise)

I have 4 HPs and all about the same age. 660Cse, 672 (2 of them) and 692. Nice thing is that they all use the same ink cartridges.
I'm not saying hp doesn't make decent printers, but they are not the best.

To me it's like buying a psu, spnd $40 on a powmax that will work ok and maybe fail and take other components with it, or spend $60 on an antec and has better power switching that will likely not fail.

(note, I've personally got a 3 year old Lexmark Z65, this thing rocks, but at work, we pretty much buy hp lasers and epson inkjets)
 

sixone

Lifer
May 3, 2004
25,030
4
61
I've had several HP's; as the tech improves, I move up. And one Lexmark - never again. Worthless piece of crap.

I :heart: my HP's.

 

Willoughbyva

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2001
3,267
0
0
I don't like lexmark inkjets, but their lazer printers are pretty good.

For an all in one I don't know what to tell you. Most all of them suck. I guess I would go with HP or Cannon. I haven't seen any Epson all in one printers in my area. As someone else mentioned I would probably go with a seperate printer and scanner.