Babe threads.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

mb

Lifer
Jun 27, 2004
10,233
2
71
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Per Derek, there is one and only one babe thread. It's not in OT, it's in L&R. For the past umpteen months, the moderators have generally been just locking them. Recently, we've started issuing official warnings and vacations. At this time, it's felt that just about everyone who posts in here regularly knows that babe threads are against the rules for OT.

Just who is Derek and why should we care what he thinks anyway? He really doesn't seem to care about the site or the posters here. He visits on a regular basis but never replies to anyone. How long have we been asking about the vBulletin transition in Technical Forum Issues and he just ignores us!
His signature says he is the "Senior CPU & Graphics Editor." WHY does he have so much control over the forums? It seems he was allowed access to the forums to fix/update some of the technical problems, but he hasn't even done that. Instead he seems to have transitioned himself to dictator.

If you post a babe thread in OT, you may be warned, you may receive a vacation. If you participate in a babe thread in OT by posting more pictures, you may be warned, you may receive a vacation. We moderators try to address each violation individually. Our response will be based on the member's history as well as the nature of any pictures posted.
This is ridiculous. The only time there was a problem before was if a thread linked directly to nudes.

At the present time, the goal is to keep OT safer for those surfing from work during their breaks or lunch. There have been suggestions to make a sub-forum for babe threads, or to move the official babe thread (located in L&R) into OT. I don't foresee either happening in the immediate future.
That is complete bullshit. If you are worried about getting in trouble for what you may click in OT while at work, STAY OUT OF OT! I personally browse OT on my lunch breaks and I don't have a problem avoiding questionable threads. And, if I do click on a thread that may be NSFW, I sure as hell know better to randomly click on links in the thread. Especially if someone asks "Who is she?" FFS use some common sense, there is absolutely no reason to ban people for that.

If you don't want to see the topics in L&R on your way to the babe thread, here's a direct link:
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=2055674&enterthread=y
Having just one babe thread, anywhere, is stupid, because mods will still ban if anyone ever posts anything "babe related" in any other thread.

There is a thread in the suggestion box about moving the babe thread into OT. The suggestion box is the place for such a discussion.
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=2258311&enterthread=y
See above. It's not about having one single babe thread in OT. It's about being able to discuss and/or post links to babes at any time and not having to worry about being banned, just like we used to be able to.




 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: lupi
You guys wonder why these forums are 95+% male - these babe threads are just one of the things that many women find offensive about the place. Some put up with it or ignore it, the rest go elsewhere. They don't want to read comments like "I'd DHITB" -DrPizza


lol

I don't even know where to begin with this one.

Maybe begin to come to the realization that this many females find this place to be a sexist, hostile environment? DrP

of all the craptastics ways certain forums around here are run, if this is the area to finally put some emphasis into, the epic lulz is nonstop.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: lupi
You guys wonder why these forums are 95+% male - these babe threads are just one of the things that many women find offensive about the place. Some put up with it or ignore it, the rest go elsewhere. They don't want to read comments like "I'd DHITB" -DrPizza


lol

I don't even know where to begin with this one.

Maybe begin to come to the realization that this many females find this place to be a sexist, hostile environment? DrP

I don't think so, not at all. I do think P&N is hostile, but OT is generally not hostile nor sexist. And honestly, I don't think you're going to get more females here by disallowing babe threads in OT. I, for one, don't mind guys finding girls attractive and making note of it.

I also don't think there is anything in OT that is keeping females away, except maybe that it's boring.

I agree with those who've said that splitting up OT and adding a bunch of lightly visited forums was the wrong thing to do. Sometimes more is not better.
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: lupi
You guys wonder why these forums are 95+% male - these babe threads are just one of the things that many women find offensive about the place. Some put up with it or ignore it, the rest go elsewhere. They don't want to read comments like "I'd DHITB" -DrPizza


lol

I don't even know where to begin with this one.

Maybe begin to come to the realization that this many females find this place to be a sexist, hostile environment? DrP

I don't think so, not at all. I do think P&N is hostile, but OT is generally not hostile nor sexist. And honestly, I don't think you're going to get more females here by disallowing babe threads in OT. I, for one, don't mind guys finding girls attractive and making note of it.

I also don't think there is anything in OT that is keeping females away, except maybe that it's boring.

I agree with those who've said that splitting up OT and adding a bunch of lightly visited forums was the wrong thing to do. Sometimes more is not better.

**High five + kiss on the cheek**

A worthy opinion from a highly respected female on these forums.
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
My new theory in life is to focus on the solution to a problem. I am not sure if we can do that if they problem isn't clearly spelled out. What I am hearing is that babe threads are the problem, but what is a babe thread? If we could get that clearly defined, maybe we could have a better shot at fixing the problem.

I know the Mods are just trying to do what they are told to do. But are we on the verge of another "Change in Culture?" They have already started out handing out vacations and have implemented a new policy of tacking on time for things that have happened in the past. A 3 week ban for linking to the most recent uploads on bbzzdd? I got a 3 day ban for posting a pic of a girl making a cake like substance. Vacationing users like that makes them find other forums to browse while they are banned. I am sure a good percentage of them start visiting those other forums more than AT. I would think that AT would want to attract users, not force them to find other places to go.

But whatever, its Anand's website and Derek runs the forums. If they want to make this a dreadful place, its their right. If what AT wants is threads on high school kids too afraid to ask out a girl, people having 3somes, how long people have sex for, threads bashing God and Jesus, threads on eating babies' corpses but they don't want us to talk about a woman just because she might be attractive to some...well that's just a shame.

I don't envy the task the Mods have been given. It seems like a lose-lose situation for them. The positive I see coming out of all this is that there will be so few users left that they won't have much moderating to do. I really thought AT had gone in a positive direction, but it looks like its reverting back to a place full of double standards and traps.

Let the high schoolers and the whiners have OT and all of AT if thats what Derek wants. Just please make a decision on exactly what it is you want.
 

sjwaste

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2000
8,757
12
81
Originally posted by: rudeguy

I don't envy the task the Mods have been given. It seems like a lose-lose situation for them. The positive I see coming out of all this is that there will be so few users left that they won't have much moderating to do. I really thought AT had gone in a positive direction, but it looks like its reverting back to a place full of double standards and traps.

Let the high schoolers and the whiners have OT and all of AT if thats what Derek wants. Just please make a decision on exactly what it is you want.

The mods are volunteers. If they don't like it, they don't have to keep donating their time to do this. Therefore If they're pushing the policy, it's safe to assume that they buy into it. It's their fault too, at this point.

People are getting banned pretty arbitrarily these days. The rules aren't clear, and making some vague statement "clarifying" it later on is not the same as having clear rules that people are to follow. I think the fact that the mods are largely unsupervised allows them to dictate their own agenda, which they are now pursuing.

Good luck. I still enjoy it here, but I've noticed a large number of threads I read through have a ban in them these days. Is that really the environment you're going for? I realize no one wants the forums to be like P&N across the board, or turn into what FWF has become. That's a lack of moderation all together. But this might be a bit extreme in the other direction.

I'm not sure at what point people decided that internet forums have to be safe for them to browse from work. That's always been a personal caveat. There's just no need to cater down to that. If some person clicks on a random link, its his fault. If that person happens to be a mod here, it's not a circumstance to push that as an agenda item.
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
Let's see. What posts most often devolve into babe threads? How about posts that involve ENTERTAINMENT.

ENTERTAINMENT would involve anyone who is in any way in the public limelight, from rock stars, to movie stars, to strippers, to cheerleaders to football players.

OT has for some time had a huge number of posts involving specifically ENTERTAINMENT.

If these types of posts are constantly devolving into babe threads, and they frequently do for obvious reasons (because butt ugly don't become famous usually in the first place) then these posts all need to be lumped into their own category.

Also every time a new movie comes out, we have multiple posts on the same movie sometimes occurring for weeks later, such as with Batman, and I think the spam in OT would be MUCH less if all of these ENTERTAINMENT posts were removed from this area. And it would also be much easier to look for a recent post on a new or old flick or a recent sports event if they were all in the same spot in the first place, and not buried under a thousand other posts in OT 1 day after posting.

While I also agree that too many sub forums are a bad idea, the purely ENTERTAINMENT forum has been needed around here since these forums started.

See here? This is exactly what is WRONG. So freakin what if you see multiple posts on one movie??? How is this harming you? The more intersting a subject is, the more it will be talked about. And if someone wants to talk about one specific point of a subject why the hell can't he have his own thread????

Trying to resolve every little annoyance is exactly what is KILLING these forums.

Get OVER IT people!!!

And no way in HELL do I support yet ANOTHER fracturing of the OT forum to include a separate "entertainment" forum. It is this very micromanaging logic (or lack thereof) that has destroyed what OT once was.

No offense, Slick. You're new here and haven't seen what OT was both before and after all the new forums and rules. But OT was a MUCH more interesting and engaging place before the forums were split and every little annoyance was addressed. Ideas like yours and whining about mutiple posts on one subject is whats KILLING these forums.

Look, I come from a long line of geeks, and one thing that seems inherent to most geeks is micromanagement and trying to control every little aspect of something. The most liberating thing life has taught me is that doing this is counterproductive in both business, and social lives. It just drives people away.

And the micromanagement of these forums has done just that. Traffic and posts are WAY, WAY, WAY down from when I first started posting here.

Sometimes the best way to fix something is to leave it the fsck alone.

Look, don't be fooled by my low post count or recent status here. I have been lurking here since this forum and website was started, but thanks for touting your high post count as a reason to shout me down anyway though.

I have been visiting here and other tech websites to get tips and help since before you probably even knew this website existed. I have been into personal and business computing since 1980. I have ran my own BBSs and forums and matchmaking software and even ran my own dial up ISP using ISDN when most of you out there who remember were using 14.4 modems. I still run a city website and forums as a hobby.

Your history and post count is only important in your small, limited world, not mine. And your post count arrogance with me and my viewpoint is one reason more posters do not post here or don?t post for very long. They get put off by know it alls like yourself, and simply leave after being repeatedly abused. Because, let's face it, nobody likes an arrogant post count attention whore, much less a forum overloaded with them. And there are plenty of other forums out there where you and others who act like you are not abusing forums and are actively running off new users just for shits and giggles, so that's partly why the traffic is down.

Also this forum software is buggy, boring and has few features available to users. Buggy software drives people off. If they frequently cant log in, or get logged out a lot and dropped, they won't keep trying and stay here. I know this from personal experience running forums and troubleshooting.

And look at all the emails and Ips they block here from even signing up to post.

3. If you receive a message saying your E-Mail address is banned, you can contact the forum moderator to question why. Below is a list of E-mail services that were banned due to abuse, and will not be re-activated upon user request.

AOL
Bigfoot
Excite
Gotoworld
Nightmail
Whitehouse
All domains operated by portofevil.com, aka evilemail.com

4. In addition to the above, all of AOL's system is banned from the forums; this includes their IP addresses. This means that even if you sign up with a different E-mail address, you will not be able to post if you connect to the internet using their service.

So they are blocking nearly half of all emails and IPs out there, because of a few abusers. You think that might lead to lower traffic? Most likely yes?

The other reasons is there is simply less interest now a days in gaining negligible speed increases out of current hardware with the current software that is available. Why risk burning up expensive hardware for nominal speed increases. Only the very anal gamers who think that a 5 FPS advantage will give them the win in online games are even interested in this over clocking hysteria anymore, and they represent such a tiny fraction of the posters here that they certainly won't be adding to our new user base, either.

And I also agree that making this a safe place to post from work is a poor excuse for implementing these seemingly arbitrary rules. What is really behind driving these strict policies is a fear of driving off possible ad revenue. If an advertiser balks at some posts, the people in charge can simply point to all the user warnings and punishments and say "See, we really are trying to control this over sexualized male mob in here, REALLY!"

Now, I also did not mean to imply I was against multiple posts about the same movie, or whatever form of entertainment or sports, regarding different aspects about them. But why do you need 50 Batman threads to discuss the same movie when most are just a spam rehash of the same original thread?

But the fact is you can not run any kind of coherent organized forum and expect one category like OFF TOPIC to take the majority of the forum traffic. That is completely nuts and as an experienced MOD it would drive me crazy if OT had hundreds of more new posts and reposts and new threads per hour than it already does. And I have seen it do just that in the past. As it is, OT and the rest of the forums are barely modable and manageable. And most of these MODS do not get paid or compensated in their never ending frustrating effort to try to make the forums useable for the average low post count user who simply has a few questions.

Which is why the sub forums are vitally NECCESSARY and why I recommended dividing out all the constant ENTERTAINMENT posts flooding the OT area. And the fact these are frequently "babe or dude" posts and are frowned upon just further reinforces this idea.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,366
19,581
146
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
Let's see. What posts most often devolve into babe threads? How about posts that involve ENTERTAINMENT.

ENTERTAINMENT would involve anyone who is in any way in the public limelight, from rock stars, to movie stars, to strippers, to cheerleaders to football players.

OT has for some time had a huge number of posts involving specifically ENTERTAINMENT.

If these types of posts are constantly devolving into babe threads, and they frequently do for obvious reasons (because butt ugly don't become famous usually in the first place) then these posts all need to be lumped into their own category.

Also every time a new movie comes out, we have multiple posts on the same movie sometimes occurring for weeks later, such as with Batman, and I think the spam in OT would be MUCH less if all of these ENTERTAINMENT posts were removed from this area. And it would also be much easier to look for a recent post on a new or old flick or a recent sports event if they were all in the same spot in the first place, and not buried under a thousand other posts in OT 1 day after posting.

While I also agree that too many sub forums are a bad idea, the purely ENTERTAINMENT forum has been needed around here since these forums started.

See here? This is exactly what is WRONG. So freakin what if you see multiple posts on one movie??? How is this harming you? The more intersting a subject is, the more it will be talked about. And if someone wants to talk about one specific point of a subject why the hell can't he have his own thread????

Trying to resolve every little annoyance is exactly what is KILLING these forums.

Get OVER IT people!!!

And no way in HELL do I support yet ANOTHER fracturing of the OT forum to include a separate "entertainment" forum. It is this very micromanaging logic (or lack thereof) that has destroyed what OT once was.

No offense, Slick. You're new here and haven't seen what OT was both before and after all the new forums and rules. But OT was a MUCH more interesting and engaging place before the forums were split and every little annoyance was addressed. Ideas like yours and whining about mutiple posts on one subject is whats KILLING these forums.

Look, I come from a long line of geeks, and one thing that seems inherent to most geeks is micromanagement and trying to control every little aspect of something. The most liberating thing life has taught me is that doing this is counterproductive in both business, and social lives. It just drives people away.

And the micromanagement of these forums has done just that. Traffic and posts are WAY, WAY, WAY down from when I first started posting here.

Sometimes the best way to fix something is to leave it the fsck alone.

Look, don't be fooled by my low post count or recent status here. I have been lurking here since this forum and website was started, but thanks for touting your high post count as a reason to shout me down anyway though.

I have been visiting here and other tech websites to get tips and help since before you probably even knew this website existed. I have been into personal and business computing since 1980. I have ran my own BBSs and forums and matchmaking software and even ran my own dial up ISP using ISDN when most of you out there who remember were using 14.4 modems. I still run a city website and forums as a hobby.

Your history and post count is only important in your small, limited world, not mine. And your post count arrogance with me and my viewpoint is one reason more posters do not post here or don?t post for very long. They get put off by know it alls like yourself, and simply leave after being repeatedly abused. Because, let's face it, nobody likes an arrogant post count attention whore, much less a forum overloaded with them. And there are plenty of other forums out there where you and others who act like you are not abusing forums and are actively running off new users just for shits and giggles, so that's partly why the traffic is down.

Also this forum software is buggy, boring and has few features available to users. Buggy software drives people off. If they frequently cant log in, or get logged out a lot and dropped, they won't keep trying and stay here. I know this from personal experience running forums and troubleshooting.

And look at all the emails and Ips they block here from even signing up to post.

3. If you receive a message saying your E-Mail address is banned, you can contact the forum moderator to question why. Below is a list of E-mail services that were banned due to abuse, and will not be re-activated upon user request.

AOL
Bigfoot
Excite
Gotoworld
Nightmail
Whitehouse
All domains operated by portofevil.com, aka evilemail.com

4. In addition to the above, all of AOL's system is banned from the forums; this includes their IP addresses. This means that even if you sign up with a different E-mail address, you will not be able to post if you connect to the internet using their service.

So they are blocking nearly half of all emails and IPs out there, because of a few abusers. You think that might lead to lower traffic? Most likely yes?

The other reasons is there is simply less interest now a days in gaining negligible speed increases out of current hardware with the current software that is available. Why risk burning up expensive hardware for nominal speed increases. Only the very anal gamers who think that a 5 FPS advantage will give them the win in online games are even interested in this over clocking hysteria anymore, and they represent such a tiny fraction of the posters here that they certainly won't be adding to our new user base, either.

And I also agree that making this a safe place to post from work is a poor excuse for implementing these seemingly arbitrary rules. What is really behind driving these strict policies is a fear of driving off possible ad revenue. If an advertiser balks at some posts, the people in charge can simply point to all the user warnings and punishments and say "See, we really are trying to control this over sexualized male mob in here, REALLY!"

Now, I also did not mean to imply I was against multiple posts about the same movie, or whatever form of entertainment or sports, regarding different aspects about them. But why do you need 50 Batman threads to discuss the same movie when most are just a spam rehash of the same original thread?

But the fact is you can not run any kind of coherent organized forum and expect one category like OFF TOPIC to take the majority of the forum traffic. That is completely nuts and as an experienced MOD it would drive me crazy if OT had hundreds of more new posts and reposts and new threads per hour than it already does. And I have seen it do just that in the past. As it is, OT and the rest of the forums are barely modable and manageable. And most of these MODS do not get paid or compensated in their never ending frustrating effort to try to make the forums useable for the average low post count user who simply has a few questions.

Which is why the sub forums are vitally NECCESSARY and why I recommended dividing out all the constant ENTERTAINMENT posts flooding the OT area. And the fact these are frequently "babe or dude" posts and are frowned upon just further reinforces this idea.

I wasn't trying to shout YOU down. Please don't confuse my irritability caused by this long growing situation as me being mad at you.

I also was not trying to use my high post count as reason to shout you down, just my time here and my experience with the forums before and after they fractured OT into innane subtopics. It looks like we must agree to disagree on the subtopics. But I will say this: The introduction of the subtopics was followed by a sharp decline in activity in OT. This is absolutely undeniable.

And as for the banned IPs? They have been banned since 2000 and before. They were banned when I started here. So to blame that for the sharp decline is pure ignorance. There is absolutely no correlation.

And as for the rest of your reply, it kinda looks like we agree. As the years have gone by they have become more restrictive and more arbitrary with their rules.

They used to ban and limit based solely on what would maximize advertising dollars. If the forums got too wild and advertisers balked, they'd clean up just enough to keep the ads going. What is going on now has NOTHING to do with advertising. There are IT forums on the internet with far less restrictions and they have more traffic and more ads. Hell, some of them seem like free-for-alls compared to ATOT.

No... Now some kind of fanatical micromanagement is going on and mods seem to be applying a more personal kind of morality and social code to their watch... and it's killing the forums. They seem hell bent on making us act like good little Christian day care kiddies with a twisted sense of political correctness sprinkled on top.

Something one learns with age and experience is that not every problem can be solved by controlling people and micromanaging. Sometimes you have to just leave things be.
 

Geekbabe

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 16, 1999
32,229
2,539
126
www.theshoppinqueen.com
Offtopic was instituted to keep chatter off the hardware forums and also
to provide a hang out for the members who tended to surf here from work
back in the old days a lot of our membership worked for the big hardware/software
companies,it made good sense to provide a place for these people to relax, after all
many of those members posted helpful advice in the other forums.

Nowadays,I think if Anand was smart,he'd turn Off Topic into a hard core pron
site, charge a hefty subscription for the service for all the non-computing
related forums and be done with it.
 

Tiamat

Lifer
Nov 25, 2003
14,068
5
71
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
If Anand was smart,he'd turn Off Topic into a hard core pron
site, charge a hefty subscription for the service and be done with it.

I know your comment was tongue-in-cheek, but he is smart enough not to want to deal with this insignificant situation. :D
 

Geekbabe

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 16, 1999
32,229
2,539
126
www.theshoppinqueen.com
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
If Anand was smart,he'd turn Off Topic into a hard core pron
site, charge a hefty subscription for the service and be done with it.

I know your comment was tongue-in-cheek, but he is smart enough not to want to deal with this insignificant situation. :D

I'm talking overall.. I think charging a subscription fee for the non-hardware related forums
would be wise.If the membership wishes to control allowed content,the membership shouldn't mind opening their wallets to pay for the service.
 

TheWart

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2000
5,219
1
76
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
If Anand was smart,he'd turn Off Topic into a hard core pron
site, charge a hefty subscription for the service and be done with it.

I know your comment was tongue-in-cheek, but he is smart enough not to want to deal with this insignificant situation. :D

I'm talking overall.. I think charging a subscription fee for the non-hardware related forums
would be wise.If the membership wishes to control allowed content,the membership shouldn't mind opening their wallets to pay for the service.

I think you would see a drastic reduction in forum activity if you start charging people to read/post in OT.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Originally posted by: lupi
You guys wonder why these forums are 95+% male - these babe threads are just one of the things that many women find offensive about the place. Some put up with it or ignore it, the rest go elsewhere. They don't want to read comments like "I'd DHITB" -DrPizza


lol

I don't even know where to begin with this one.

Maybe begin to come to the realization that this many females find this place to be a sexist, hostile environment? DrP

I don't think so, not at all. I do think P&N is hostile, but OT is generally not hostile nor sexist. And honestly, I don't think you're going to get more females here by disallowing babe threads in OT. I, for one, don't mind guys finding girls attractive and making note of it.

I also don't think there is anything in OT that is keeping females away, except maybe that it's boring.

I agree with those who've said that splitting up OT and adding a bunch of lightly visited forums was the wrong thing to do. Sometimes more is not better.

i have to agree with mosh

Ot is not sexist, IMO the low female member numbers on AT has more to do with the fact that its a fing Tech forum and tech stuff is not exactly the most popular thing with the ladies

 

Baked

Lifer
Dec 28, 2004
36,052
17
81
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Nowadays,I think if Anand was smart,he'd turn Off Topic into a hard core pron
site, charge a hefty subscription for the service for all the non-computing
related forums and be done with it.

The best porn on the net are free, and no I'm not talking about the ones where you get 10 pics outta a 150 pic set, or 30 sec videos clips from an hour movie. Unfortunately, spyware, trojan, and viruses are not included. Just saying.
 

Tiamat

Lifer
Nov 25, 2003
14,068
5
71
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
If Anand was smart,he'd turn Off Topic into a hard core pron
site, charge a hefty subscription for the service and be done with it.

I know your comment was tongue-in-cheek, but he is smart enough not to want to deal with this insignificant situation. :D

I'm talking overall.. I think charging a subscription fee for the non-hardware related forums
would be wise.If the membership wishes to control allowed content,the membership shouldn't mind opening their wallets to pay for the service.

True, Something Awful has been subscription only as long as I have known and they have a decently sized membership.
 

TheWart

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2000
5,219
1
76
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
If Anand was smart,he'd turn Off Topic into a hard core pron
site, charge a hefty subscription for the service and be done with it.

I know your comment was tongue-in-cheek, but he is smart enough not to want to deal with this insignificant situation. :D

I'm talking overall.. I think charging a subscription fee for the non-hardware related forums
would be wise.If the membership wishes to control allowed content,the membership shouldn't mind opening their wallets to pay for the service.

True, Something Awful has been subscription only as long as I have known and they have a decently sized membership.

Ugh, but with that size of membership comes the quality of SA...*shudder*
 

BigJ

Lifer
Nov 18, 2001
21,330
1
81
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
If Anand was smart,he'd turn Off Topic into a hard core pron
site, charge a hefty subscription for the service and be done with it.

I know your comment was tongue-in-cheek, but he is smart enough not to want to deal with this insignificant situation. :D

I'm talking overall.. I think charging a subscription fee for the non-hardware related forums
would be wise.If the membership wishes to control allowed content,the membership shouldn't mind opening their wallets to pay for the service.

True, Something Awful has been subscription only as long as I have known and they have a decently sized membership.

AT is not Something Awful. While AT has great free forums, I feel they simply do not offer enough to maintain current membership levels and be able to charge a fee.

They probably could've pulled it off before splitting the forums and some other things happened. Hell, I would've paid and was even an AT Subscriber back in the day. These days, I'd go somewhere else if they instituted a fee. I find myself visiting the forums less and less anyway due to lack of traffic.
 

Tiamat

Lifer
Nov 25, 2003
14,068
5
71
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: Tiamat
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
If Anand was smart,he'd turn Off Topic into a hard core pron
site, charge a hefty subscription for the service and be done with it.

I know your comment was tongue-in-cheek, but he is smart enough not to want to deal with this insignificant situation. :D

I'm talking overall.. I think charging a subscription fee for the non-hardware related forums
would be wise.If the membership wishes to control allowed content,the membership shouldn't mind opening their wallets to pay for the service.

True, Something Awful has been subscription only as long as I have known and they have a decently sized membership.

AT is not Something Awful. While AT has great free forums, I feel they simply do not offer enough to maintain current membership levels and be able to charge a fee.

They probably could've pulled it off before splitting the forums and some other things happened. Hell, I would've paid and was even an AT Subscriber back in the day. These days, I'd go somewhere else if they instituted a fee. I find myself visiting the forums less and less anyway due to lack of traffic.

True. I was just mentioning that subscription based memberships have worked. I don't think it would work for AT.
 
Oct 27, 2007
17,009
5
0
The problem is that the rules on this forum don't reflect the members, they reflect the whims of Derek and his cronies and the imaginary users they want to attract.
 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,754
64
91
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Per Derek, there is one and only one babe thread. It's not in OT, it's in L&R. For the past umpteen months, the moderators have generally been just locking them. Recently, we've started issuing official warnings and vacations. At this time, it's felt that just about everyone who posts in here regularly knows that babe threads are against the rules for OT.

If you post a babe thread in OT, you may be warned, you may receive a vacation. If you participate in a babe thread in OT by posting more pictures, you may be warned, you may receive a vacation. We moderators try to address each violation individually. Our response will be based on the member's history as well as the nature of any pictures posted.

At the present time, the goal is to keep OT safer for those surfing from work during their breaks or lunch. There have been suggestions to make a sub-forum for babe threads, or to move the official babe thread (located in L&R) into OT. I don't foresee either happening in the immediate future.

If you don't want to see the topics in L&R on your way to the babe thread, here's a direct link:
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=2055674&enterthread=y

There is a thread in the suggestion box about moving the babe thread into OT. The suggestion box is the place for such a discussion.
http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=2258311&enterthread=y

Thanks in advance,
-Anandtech Moderator DrPizza


(10 day sticky)

Your heavy handed stupidity is killing this forum. Are you really this stupid?




No, but you may be. Abusing mods isn't something I take lightly so take some time off and learn some manners.


esquared
Anandtech Senior Moderator
 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,754
64
91
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
The problem is that the rules on this forum don't reflect the members, they reflect the whims of Derek and his cronies and the imaginary users they want to attract.

Srsly.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
what i find funny about this is that Offtopic.com is one of the most sexist boards out there and it has 100x the female members we do AND they charge moneys