Babe threads.

[rudeguy]

So my theory that subforums don't exist if they were created after you joined is flawed?

 

[Praetor]

Is it wrong that I am suddenly tempted to post random pics of random hot chicks in this thread in a vain attempt to derail it?
One person has already been vacationed for that. Wanna be #2? -DrPizza

 

[rudeguy]

Here is one thing I would like clarified. This thread got locked because it wasn't about love or relationships. It wasn't exactly a babe thread, but I thought L&R would be more appropriate since pics were involved and all.

Are we basically banned from discussing if a woman/man/gorilla is attractive outside of the babe thread?

I am not trying to stir the pot, nor am I trying to make the Mods jobs harder. ATOT is mostly a male population and males tend to talk about women. If posting pics makes a thread a babe thread, fine. Say no pics and vacation anyone that does post pics. But when we try to post in the correct forum, and the threads get locked because they aren't exactly about love or relationships, it makes me think that AT (or Derek) is afraid of us discussing women at all. Even my Amish relatives will nudge the guy helping him milk his goat if a pretty girl walk by.

I don't want anyone to stop visiting AT because it might not be worksafe. I also don't anyone to stop visiting because they might be banned if they talk about any member of the species that happens to have breasts.

Loosen up the rules in L&R, tell the 13 year olds to just ASK THE CHICK OUT ALREADY and then maybe that subforum will actually get some traffic.

 

[Rubycon]

Originally posted by: wwswimming
Just to be fair to the women members of AT, shouldn't there be a "Hunk" thread ?

That would be fair game - nice change!

Thanks for finally putting the feet down! It's LONG overdue.

:thumbsup:

 

[NFS4]

I agree, this is getting pretty ridiculous. It's getting to the point that if the thread involves a woman + a pic it gets locked. What the hell kind of crap is that? I miss the old AnandTech Off Topic forums. What exactly are the mods or anyone in power exactly trying to prove here? Are we against the female form in general? Do they think that women are being objectified? Can an attractive female not be talked about without fear of the thread getting locked?

Oh, but wait, we can weed through a 15-page thread in the L&R forum to post a simple picture of a woman who is wearing normal clothes (not even a bikini) and just happens to be attractive. :roll:

If I want to post a thread about Natalie Portman starring in a new movie and post a link/pic to her in the movie, I have to worry about the thread getting locked or I have to post it in the L&R babe thread? I mean, WTF?

And what the hell -- we're trying to protect people who are surfing at work? If your dumbass is surfing ATOT and clicking links in threads with women in it, you deserve everything you get. It shouldn't be AnandTech's job to protect someone using a work computer for anything other than work.

 

[Alone]

Originally posted by: Rubycon

Originally posted by: wwswimming
Just to be fair to the women members of AT, shouldn't there be a "Hunk" thread ?

That would be fair game - nice change!

Thanks for finally putting the feet down! It's LONG overdue.

:thumbsup:

wat?

 

[Baked]

Originally posted by: NFS4
And what the hell -- we're trying to protect people who are surfing at work? If your dumbass is surfing ATOT and clicking clicking links in threads with women in it, you deserve everything you get. It shouldn't be AnandTech's job to protect someone using a work computer for anything other than work.

Welcome to modern America, personal responsibility is not required. And if you get in trouble, it's never your fault, just blame other people. Sad.

 

[Dumac]

Originally posted by: NFS4
If I want to post a thread about Natalie Portman starring in a new movie and post a link/pink to her in the movie, I have to worry about the thread getting locked or I have to post it in the L&R babe thread? I mean, WTF?

Wait, that would be considered a babe thread?

Would any thread where pictures of men are linked or a man is said to be hot considered a stud thread?

 

[BoomerD]

meh...don't care. I don't come here for pics of T&A...lots of places that can be found.

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: BoomerD
meh...don't care. I don't come here for pics of T&A...lots of places that can be found.

That's not the point -- pics that aren't even about T&A are being locked.

I had a thread about a chick's fucked up eyes locked because I said she was attractive:roll:

 

[alfa147x]

I think the mods need a

 

[olds]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: BoomerD
meh...don't care. I don't come here for pics of T&A...lots of places that can be found.

That's not the point -- pics that aren't even about T&A are being locked.

I had a thread about a chick's fucked up eyes locked because I said she was attractive:roll:

I am positive you know that it would evolve into a babe thread so it was locked preemptively.
Personally, I'd rather the Mods moderated by editing threads and giving out vacations to the people that cause the thread to go off course.
Now we just need 50 more Mods.

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: BoomerD
meh...don't care. I don't come here for pics of T&A...lots of places that can be found.

That's not the point -- pics that aren't even about T&A are being locked.

I had a thread about a chick's fucked up eyes locked because I said she was attractive:roll:

I am positive you know that it would evolve into a babe thread so it was locked preemptively.
Personally, I'd rather the Mods moderated by editing threads and giving out vacations to the people that cause the thread to go off course.
Now we just need 50 more Mods.

Which gets back to the point of why can't we talk about an attractive woman?

If it's an ugly old hag, then it's OK? ATOT never used to be this preachy.

 

[olds]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: BoomerD
meh...don't care. I don't come here for pics of T&A...lots of places that can be found.

That's not the point -- pics that aren't even about T&A are being locked.

I had a thread about a chick's fucked up eyes locked because I said she was attractive:roll:

I am positive you know that it would evolve into a babe thread so it was locked preemptively.
Personally, I'd rather the Mods moderated by editing threads and giving out vacations to the people that cause the thread to go off course.
Now we just need 50 more Mods.

Which gets back to the point of why can't we talk about an attractive woman?

If it's an ugly old hag, then it's OK? ATOT never used to be this preachy.

You can. In the babe thread.

EDIT
BTW, you have Anand's ear, ask him.

 

[chusteczka]

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
... Personally, I'd rather the Mods moderated by editing threads and giving out vacations to the people that cause the thread to go off course. ...

... in Off Topic ... :disgust:

 

[olds]

Originally posted by: chusteczka

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
... Personally, I'd rather the Mods moderated by editing threads and giving out vacations to the people that cause the thread to go off course. ...

... in Off Topic ... :disgust:

Listen. I'll try to explain it to you so you can understand.

NFS4 asked why a thread of his on OT was locked when it hadn't evolved into a babe thread. (Babe threads are not allowed in OT)
I replied that it probably shouldn't be locked and instead edited by the Mods in an attempt to keep it on topic and out of babe thread terriority.

Now take that dick out of your eye and read it again.

 

[NFS4]

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: BoomerD
meh...don't care. I don't come here for pics of T&A...lots of places that can be found.

That's not the point -- pics that aren't even about T&A are being locked.

I had a thread about a chick's fucked up eyes locked because I said she was attractive:roll:

I am positive you know that it would evolve into a babe thread so it was locked preemptively.
Personally, I'd rather the Mods moderated by editing threads and giving out vacations to the people that cause the thread to go off course.
Now we just need 50 more Mods.

Which gets back to the point of why can't we talk about an attractive woman?

If it's an ugly old hag, then it's OK? ATOT never used to be this preachy.

You can. In the babe thread.

EDIT
BTW, you have Anand's ear, ask him.

Where's the logic in using a 15-page thread to talk about a current event involving a single person.

What if the mods said if you want to talk about religion, it can only be in ONE thread no matter what -- and that thread stretched on for 20+ pages.

Do you understand how ridiculous that sounds?

As for Anand, he has bigger fish to fry than worry about babe threads.

 

[chusteczka]

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat

Originally posted by: chusteczka

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
... Personally, I'd rather the Mods moderated by editing threads and giving out vacations to the people that cause the thread to go off course. ...

... in Off Topic ... :disgust:

Listen. I'll try to explain it to you so you can understand.

NFS4 asked why a thread of his on OT was locked when it hadn't evolved into a babe thread. (Babe threads are not allowed in OT)
I replied that it probably shouldn't be locked and instead edited by the Mods in an attempt to keep it on topic and out of babe thread terriority.

Now take that dick out of your eye and read it again.

There are times such as these that I would much rather have a discussion in person.

 

[olds]

Originally posted by: chusteczka

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat

Originally posted by: chusteczka

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
... Personally, I'd rather the Mods moderated by editing threads and giving out vacations to the people that cause the thread to go off course. ...

... in Off Topic ... :disgust:

Listen. I'll try to explain it to you so you can understand.

NFS4 asked why a thread of his on OT was locked when it hadn't evolved into a babe thread. (Babe threads are not allowed in OT)
I replied that it probably shouldn't be locked and instead edited by the Mods in an attempt to keep it on topic and out of babe thread terriority.

Now take that dick out of your eye and read it again.

There are times such as these that I would much rather have a discussion in person.

I welcome that with open arm. Where do you live?

 

[olds]

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat

Originally posted by: NFS4

Originally posted by: BoomerD
meh...don't care. I don't come here for pics of T&A...lots of places that can be found.

That's not the point -- pics that aren't even about T&A are being locked.

I had a thread about a chick's fucked up eyes locked because I said she was attractive:roll:

I am positive you know that it would evolve into a babe thread so it was locked preemptively.
Personally, I'd rather the Mods moderated by editing threads and giving out vacations to the people that cause the thread to go off course.
Now we just need 50 more Mods.

Which gets back to the point of why can't we talk about an attractive woman?

If it's an ugly old hag, then it's OK? ATOT never used to be this preachy.

You can. In the babe thread.

EDIT
BTW, you have Anand's ear, ask him.

Where's the logic in using a 15-page thread to talk about a current event involving a single person.

What if the mods said if you want to talk about religion, it can only be in ONE thread no matter what -- and that thread stretched on for 20+ pages.

Do you understand how ridiculous that sounds?

As for Anand, he has bigger fish to fry than worry about babe threads.

I agree, I was commenting current policy.

 

[JM Aggie08]

OT becoming PG?

It's the beginning of the end

 

[Raduque]

Originally posted by: Kadarin

Originally posted by: DrPizza
There have been suggestions to make a sub-forum for babe threads

Yes, please.

I'll agree with this.

Not allowing babe threads in an Off Topic forum is Epic Fail on a completely different level than any other Epic Fail ever.

 

[CorCentral]

The Mods here are tyrying to accommodate everyone here and you guys still complain!

1st in line for a Subcription fee of $30./yr

 

[MixMasterTang]

Originally posted by: CorCentral
The Mods here are tyrying to accommodate everyone here and you guys still complain!

1st in line for a Subcription fee of $30./yr

That's the problem, you cannot and never will be able to accommodate everyone...

 

[JJChicken]

Bring back the garage, health & fitness, l&R into OT or this place is going die sooner or later