seemingly random
Diamond Member
- Oct 10, 2007
- 5,277
- 0
- 0
Wait, didn't bush redistribute the wealth to the wealthy at the beginning of the decade?Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.
For about the 100th time, Obama is not a socialist.
In order to believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.
The only claiming Obama isn't a socialist is YOU, I have to think you're just trying to decieve people at this point. Obama is the definition of a socialist. He wants to "spread the wealth around", is for socialized medicine, XYZ. He's a socialist, if you're so sure he isn't and you want to actually argue against the grain, then back it up with some actual evidence...
Isn't the wealth being redistributed by the federal gov't to states - say, for instance, alaska? And alaska needs it so much that the last governor bought the election, I mean campaigned on giving money to every man, woman and child.
