At this point it's just plain sickening...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is not a socialist.

In order to believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.

The only claiming Obama isn't a socialist is YOU, I have to think you're just trying to decieve people at this point. Obama is the definition of a socialist. He wants to "spread the wealth around", is for socialized medicine, XYZ. He's a socialist, if you're so sure he isn't and you want to actually argue against the grain, then back it up with some actual evidence...
Wait, didn't bush redistribute the wealth to the wealthy at the beginning of the decade?

Isn't the wealth being redistributed by the federal gov't to states - say, for instance, alaska? And alaska needs it so much that the last governor bought the election, I mean campaigned on giving money to every man, woman and child.
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is a socialist.

If you don't believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.


He plans to redistribute wealth and it will be a combination of Communism, Marxism and Socialism.

You forgot Nazism.

Anyways, wouldn't that bring on the end days, the thing you boys of the rapture are all that bullsheit?

You are a very sick individual in many ways, the only thing you would ever get from Jesus would be a spit in your face for your hate.

See, for some reason Jesus was loving and those following him (including Paul) are hateful war mongerers.

Personally believe you have a father figure issue.

Your father was a hamster and your mother smelt of elderberries.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is a socialist.

If you don't believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.


He plans to redistribute wealth and it will be a combination of Communism, Marxism and Socialism.

It really doesn't matter what you call Obama, the bottom line is that he is against personal freedom and for more government control of people's lives.

Quite the contrary, the conservative party wants to restrict homosexuals and to make the list short, women (obviously since they shouldn't have the rights to their own bodies) and men.

Now a more restrictive bullshit government than that is hard to fucking imagine.

Tell me, specifically what "liberals" would do.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is a socialist.

If you don't believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.


He plans to redistribute wealth and it will be a combination of Communism, Marxism and Socialism.

You forgot Nazism.

Anyways, wouldn't that bring on the end days, the thing you boys of the rapture are all that bullsheit?

You are a very sick individual in many ways, the only thing you would ever get from Jesus would be a spit in your face for your hate.

See, for some reason Jesus was loving and those following him (including Paul) are hateful war mongerers.

Personally believe you have a father figure issue.

Your father was a hamster and your mother smelt of elderberries.

I wouldn't know, both of them were dead before i reached the age of one.

 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is not a socialist.

In order to believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.

The only claiming Obama isn't a socialist is YOU, I have to think you're just trying to decieve people at this point. Obama is the definition of a socialist. He wants to "spread the wealth around", is for socialized medicine, XYZ. He's a socialist, if you're so sure he isn't and you want to actually argue against the grain, then back it up with some actual evidence...
Wait, didn't bush redistribute the wealth to the wealthy at the beginning of the decade?

Isn't the wealth being redistributed by the federal gov't to states - say, for instance, alaska? And alaska needs it so much that the last governor bought the election, I mean campaigned on giving money to every man, woman and child.

That was money given BACK to people that got TAKEN at GUNPOINT, ie Taxes. ANd i'm no fan of Bush's spending spree's, but i'd much rather my employer get some tax breaks than blindly giving to people who don't even pay much taxes. At least the employer will use the money to create jobs or pay their employees more.
 

OneOfTheseDays

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2000
7,052
0
0
Say it with me, President Barack Hussein Obama.

God I bet it just kills you to say that, you're going to have to call a black man President. I bet it kills you.
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is a socialist.

If you don't believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.


He plans to redistribute wealth and it will be a combination of Communism, Marxism and Socialism.

You forgot Nazism.

Anyways, wouldn't that bring on the end days, the thing you boys of the rapture are all that bullsheit?

You are a very sick individual in many ways, the only thing you would ever get from Jesus would be a spit in your face for your hate.

See, for some reason Jesus was loving and those following him (including Paul) are hateful war mongerers.

Personally believe you have a father figure issue.

Your father was a hamster and your mother smelt of elderberries.

I wouldn't know, both of them were dead before i reached the age of one.

I submit that you see people on a forum whom you know very little about as having father figure issues, because for some reason you recognize part of yourself in their posting persona. Am I right? Do you want to talk about this next week?
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is not a socialist.

In order to believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.

The only claiming Obama isn't a socialist is YOU, I have to think you're just trying to decieve people at this point. Obama is the definition of a socialist. He wants to "spread the wealth around", is for socialized medicine, XYZ. He's a socialist, if you're so sure he isn't and you want to actually argue against the grain, then back it up with some actual evidence...
Wait, didn't bush redistribute the wealth to the wealthy at the beginning of the decade?

Isn't the wealth being redistributed by the federal gov't to states - say, for instance, alaska? And alaska needs it so much that the last governor bought the election, I mean campaigned on giving money to every man, woman and child.

That was money given BACK to people that got TAKEN at GUNPOINT, ie Taxes. ANd i'm no fan of Bush's spending spree's, but i'd much rather my employer get some tax breaks than blindly giving to people who don't even pay much taxes. At least the employer will use the money to create jobs or pay their employees more.

Wow, you have no fucking idea what you even think yourself and what is the beliefs of talking points anymore, do you.

Christ you're a sorry arse individual, stay of telly and the radio for a few weeks and try to think for yourself and you might come up with somtething to think.
 

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is a socialist.

If you don't believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.


He plans to redistribute wealth and it will be a combination of Communism, Marxism and Socialism.

It really doesn't matter what you call Obama, the bottom line is that he is against personal freedom and for more government control of people's lives.


QFT
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is not a socialist.

In order to believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.

The only claiming Obama isn't a socialist is YOU, I have to think you're just trying to decieve people at this point. Obama is the definition of a socialist. He wants to "spread the wealth around", is for socialized medicine, XYZ. He's a socialist, if you're so sure he isn't and you want to actually argue against the grain, then back it up with some actual evidence...
Wait, didn't bush redistribute the wealth to the wealthy at the beginning of the decade?

Isn't the wealth being redistributed by the federal gov't to states - say, for instance, alaska? And alaska needs it so much that the last governor bought the election, I mean campaigned on giving money to every man, woman and child.

That was money given BACK to people that got TAKEN at GUNPOINT, ie Taxes. ANd i'm no fan of Bush's spending spree's, but i'd much rather my employer get some tax breaks than blindly giving to people who don't even pay much taxes. At least the employer will use the money to create jobs or pay their employees more.

Wow, you have no fucking idea what you even think yourself and what is the beliefs of talking points anymore, do you.

Christ you're a sorry arse individual, stay of telly and the radio for a few weeks and try to think for yourself and you might come up with somtething to think.

Listen boy, make some real arguments or ill take your nintendo away. How would you like that, cupcake?
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,300
34,745
136
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is not a socialist.

In order to believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.

The only claiming Obama isn't a socialist is YOU, I have to think you're just trying to decieve people at this point. Obama is the definition of a socialist. He wants to "spread the wealth around", is for socialized medicine, XYZ. He's a socialist, if you're so sure he isn't and you want to actually argue against the grain, then back it up with some actual evidence...
Wait, didn't bush redistribute the wealth to the wealthy at the beginning of the decade?

Isn't the wealth being redistributed by the federal gov't to states - say, for instance, alaska? And alaska needs it so much that the last governor bought the election, I mean campaigned on giving money to every man, woman and child.

That was money given BACK to people that got TAKEN at GUNPOINT, ie Taxes. ANd i'm no fan of Bush's spending spree's, but i'd much rather my employer get some tax breaks than blindly giving to people who don't even pay much taxes. At least the employer will use the money to create jobs or pay their employees more.

Wow, you have no fucking idea what you even think yourself and what is the beliefs of talking points anymore, do you.

Christ you're a sorry arse individual, stay of telly and the radio for a few weeks and try to think for yourself and you might come up with somtething to think.

Listen boy, make some real arguments or ill take your nintendo away. How would you like that, cupcake?

Who would Jesus insult?
 

T2T III

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,899
1
0
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Wow, you have no fucking idea what you even think yourself and what is the beliefs of talking points anymore, do you.

Christ you're a sorry arse individual, stay of telly and the radio for a few weeks and try to think for yourself and you might come up with somtething to think.
I recall a few threads back when you picked my age out as 17-20, based on maturity level and not actual age. Based upon your responses, you must be what? 12?
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is not a socialist.

In order to believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.

The only claiming Obama isn't a socialist is YOU, I have to think you're just trying to decieve people at this point. Obama is the definition of a socialist. He wants to "spread the wealth around", is for socialized medicine, XYZ. He's a socialist, if you're so sure he isn't and you want to actually argue against the grain, then back it up with some actual evidence...
Wait, didn't bush redistribute the wealth to the wealthy at the beginning of the decade?

Isn't the wealth being redistributed by the federal gov't to states - say, for instance, alaska? And alaska needs it so much that the last governor bought the election, I mean campaigned on giving money to every man, woman and child.

That was money given BACK to people that got TAKEN at GUNPOINT, ie Taxes. ANd i'm no fan of Bush's spending spree's, but i'd much rather my employer get some tax breaks than blindly giving to people who don't even pay much taxes. At least the employer will use the money to create jobs or pay their employees more.

Wow, you have no fucking idea what you even think yourself and what is the beliefs of talking points anymore, do you.

Christ you're a sorry arse individual, stay of telly and the radio for a few weeks and try to think for yourself and you might come up with somtething to think.

Listen boy, make some real arguments or ill take your nintendo away. How would you like that, cupcake?

Who would Jesus insult?

I'm illustrating how John sounds by acting like him. Got that, HUH, DO YOU PUNK??
 

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
Originally posted by: JohnhasShitforBrains
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is a socialist.

If you don't believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.


He plans to redistribute wealth and it will be a combination of Communism, Marxism and Socialism.

You forgot Nazism.

Thanks JSFB
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Get a clue, this is just the front of a much larger GOP swiftboat fleet that has not fully arrived yet, these wimps are some what rubber rafts, soon the destroyers will arrive, then the Battle ship Arizona re floated from Pearl Harbor, and then as a final finishing salvo, Joe the plumber will detach and fire every kitchen sink in America at Obama. Its a lead pipe cinch, that will work.
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Get a clue, this is just the front of a much larger GOP swiftboat fleet that has not fully arrived yet, these wimps are some what rubber rafts, soon the destroyers will arrive, then the Battle ship Arizona re floated from Pearl Harbor, and then as a final finishing salvo, Joe the plumber will detach and fire every kitchen sink in America at Obama. Its a lead pipe cinch, that will work.

Sure sure.. but the good thing for America in all this is, all it takes is reporting what Obama says out of his own mouth to turn people against him. You can call it whatever you want, swiftboating, whatever, but people aren't as stupid as you leftists want to believe. You'd love everyone to think they're just idiots, uninformed, that way you'd feel that much less guilt in taking their freedoms away one by one through socialized programs.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Its funny to see the die hard right wing nutsacks getting all upset so close to losing the election. Anything to avoid the fact that thier president massively damaged our country. Now they feign anger that Obama is winning and blame the media. Blame BUSH! He is why Obama will be YOUR president for the next 8 years. =)
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,300
34,745
136
Is Obama wearing women's underwear at his rallies?

Why is the press hiding this?

Obama supports taxing the rich, how is this different?

QUIT DODGING THE ISSUE!!!! OBAMA IS WEARING WOMEN'S UNDERWEAR AT RALLIES AND ALL YOU LIBERALS CARE ABOUT IS AMERICAN SOLDIERS GETTING KILLED IN IRAQ!!!!!
 

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
Originally posted by: JohnhasShitforBrains
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is a socialist.

If you don't believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.


He plans to redistribute wealth and it will be a combination of Communism, Marxism and Socialism.

It really doesn't matter what you call Obama, the bottom line is that he is against personal freedom and for more government control of people's lives.

Quite the contrary, the conservative party wants to restrict homosexuals and to make the list short, women (obviously since they shouldn't have the rights to their own bodies) and men.

Now a more restrictive bullshit government than that is hard to fucking imagine.

Tell me, specifically what "liberals" would do.

I now see why you are so angry,

 

whistleclient

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2001
2,700
1
71
Originally posted by: Duwelon


The only claiming Obama isn't a socialist is YOU, I have to think you're just trying to decieve people at this point. Obama is the definition of a socialist. He wants to "spread the wealth around".

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvM3_ZH9euc"> here's a video of McCain talking about it being okay to spread the wealth around.
</a>
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
OP - all of your posts make me sick.

Guess sometime soon there will be quite a few needing an enema and lots of antacid.
One thing for sure....
With Congress Democratic and the White House Democratic lots of stuff is going to happen rather quickly. Not sure what Obama might do with SCOTUS appointments but IF the Senate gets 60... heheheheheh guess what... not only will the various Federal courts be filled with Obama appointments but the States as well will tend to follow along...
Ya can't label Obama more than what he really is. What he is he's been for awhile now with no issues... State and Federal service... Run for President and folks search for anything they can to smear the other side of their candidate... normal, I guess...
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,149
55,681
136
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is not a socialist.

In order to believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.

The only claiming Obama isn't a socialist is YOU, I have to think you're just trying to decieve people at this point. Obama is the definition of a socialist. He wants to "spread the wealth around", is for socialized medicine, XYZ. He's a socialist, if you're so sure he isn't and you want to actually argue against the grain, then back it up with some actual evidence...

Socialism, by definition, for about the 100th time on these boards, is community ownership of the means of production and the distribution of goods. Nowhere, ever has Obama articulated either one of these positions. Therefore, he is not a socialist. I am not the only person on here who argues he is not a socialist, pretty much everyone who has ever picked up a political science or economics textbook has tried to tell you that. (in vain)

These are basic, basic definitions. They have been shown to you and a few other fools over and over again. You simply deny reality when it doesn't fit what you want it to be. I'm terribly sorry the dictionary is against you and won't label Obama as a socialist, but there's nothing I can do about it.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: JohnhasShitforBrains
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is a socialist.

If you don't believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.


He plans to redistribute wealth and it will be a combination of Communism, Marxism and Socialism.

It really doesn't matter what you call Obama, the bottom line is that he is against personal freedom and for more government control of people's lives.

Quite the contrary, the conservative party wants to restrict homosexuals and to make the list short, women (obviously since they shouldn't have the rights to their own bodies) and men.

Now a more restrictive bullshit government than that is hard to fucking imagine.

Tell me, specifically what "liberals" would do.

I now see why you are so angry,

I can't vote for either of them, but if i could it would be Obama, a man who will help our cause here on the border of Pakistan.

I know you piss all over the constitution, troops and all of that just like Bush has done, but Obama has stated, and was critisised for stating that he will be on US so we can eradicate the Taliban, something Bush obviously never wanted to do, nor does McCain want to do it, he wants to "Sit down and talk with our ally" an ally that has made pecae treties with our enemy and the ISI that has fought us and got pretty fucking dead tryiing.

Who the fuck are you you little twat?
 

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Duwelon

Obama is a socialist, which is just a communist without a full fledged dictatorship anyway.

For about the 100th time, Obama is a socialist.

If you don't believe that you would have to be exceedingly ignorant, exceedingly stupid, or exceedingly dishonest. I'll let you figure out which one fits.


He plans to redistribute wealth and it will be a combination of Communism, Marxism and Socialism.

You forgot Nazism.

Anyways, wouldn't that bring on the end days, the thing you boys of the rapture are all that bullsheit?

You are a very sick individual in many ways, the only thing you would ever get from Jesus would be a spit in your face for your hate.

See, for some reason Jesus was loving and those following him (including Paul) are hateful war mongerers.

Personally believe you have a father figure issue.

Your father was a hamster and your mother smelt of elderberries.

I wouldn't know, both of them were dead before i reached the age of one.

I submit that you see people on a forum whom you know very little about as having father figure issues, because for some reason you recognize part of yourself in their posting persona. Am I right? Do you want to talk about this next week?

I think you may be on to something..