• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

AT Shot of the Day Thread

Page 70 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

repoman0

Diamond Member
Jun 17, 2010
5,191
4,572
136
The indoor church (?) shot is terrific.

We need to see the photos your GF got .... Fuji vs. Nikon ... GO !

I appreciate that coming from you, all your work you post here is fantastic ... but the church shot was luck more than anything. I didn't realize just how lucky it was until I was touching it up, thinking about the odds of the sun being in the exact right spot in the sky at the exact right time of year during the short time my photographer-noob self happened to be standing in the front of an empty cathedral.

Anyway ... the Fuji is gonna win every time! It's an old Nikon, roughly the era of my last Canon digital camera. I am consistently surprised how much I can pull back highlights and push shadows on these newer RAW files, and how much more consistent autofocus is. The nicer optics doesn't hurt either for sharpness and color since I certainly wasn't buying L glass back in the day.

I bet modern Nikon would match or beat Fuji in most categories but size and weight ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: CuriousMike

Rifter

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,522
751
126
PSA you should all read the new terms, especially the part about them being able to use and sell any of the posted media on this site. Jlee mentioned this in a thread in OT

"4.2 Our License to User Content. When you post User Content on or through the Services, you grant Purch a world-wide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, non-exclusive, and sub-licenseable license to use, copy, distribute, reproduce, modify, edit, adapt, publicly perform, publicly display, translate, create derivative works from, sell, lease, transmit, disassemble, and publish such User Content, in whole or in part, in any format or medium now known or developed in the future, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the Services (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels. You acknowledge and agree that your user name may be associated with any User Content that you post."

So unless you are cool with our new overlords using your pics for profit without your consent or permission i would probably stop posting any pics on this site.
 

repoman0

Diamond Member
Jun 17, 2010
5,191
4,572
136
PSA you should all read the new terms, especially the part about them being able to use and sell any of the posted media on this site. Jlee mentioned this in a thread in OT

"4.2 Our License to User Content. When you post User Content on or through the Services, you grant Purch a world-wide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, non-exclusive, and sub-licenseable license to use, copy, distribute, reproduce, modify, edit, adapt, publicly perform, publicly display, translate, create derivative works from, sell, lease, transmit, disassemble, and publish such User Content, in whole or in part, in any format or medium now known or developed in the future, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the Services (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels. You acknowledge and agree that your user name may be associated with any User Content that you post."

So unless you are cool with our new overlords using your pics for profit without your consent or permission i would probably stop posting any pics on this site.

Interesting ...... that sounds very unfortunate. I can't decipher the legalese; does it matter that our pics are hosted elsewhere and we are simply posting links?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CuriousMike

CuriousMike

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2001
3,044
544
136
Yeah, I'm kinda feeling ickier about this wording than I've seen on other sites.

I suppose I could start uploading 640x480.... :p
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
iirc adobe went through something similar back when they updated the terms of a hosting platform.

afaik, and just speaking as someone who's mildly interested in this sort of thing, and also someone used to legalese, you pretty much have to give purch a license so that other people can read what you post on this board. otherwise, purch would be republishing your content without your consent. further, this board is run commercially, so the license has to cover that. even more further, purch needs the ability to change message board systems and technologies without running afoul of the limited license being granted. or maybe, if there's something particularly amazing posted by someone here, highlighting it on the front page (which has been done before).

so, you get the language that accomplishes that.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,899
34,001
136
Western screech owl in cottonwood tree, San Pedro River, AZ

screechowl.jpg

screechowl2.jpg



Redtail tail feathers at 60ft.
redtail.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: CuriousMike

zCypher

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2002
6,115
171
116
Been a while! The pics here never fail to deliver. I just got back from Asia. I didn't take as many DSLR shots as I'd have liked this time, but here are a few snaps with the 105mm:

Maldives sunrise:
32925364510_59f63ed329_h.jpg


Maldives dolphins (damn them buggers are hard to capture??):
32925359360_ae62a43c57_h.jpg


Waterfall mist + overcast/rain, this one is at Lake Sebu in South Cotabato, Philippines:
33180072531_40e06bd159_h.jpg


Close-up:
32925361960_f589e46b20_h.jpg


Enjoying the nature:
33308112445_f8a0b44b3b_h.jpg
 
Last edited:

CuriousMike

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2001
3,044
544
136
I looked at your set on flickr and there are some nice shots.

What 105 are you shooting with? Some of those are extraordinarily sharp with good color.
 

zCypher

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2002
6,115
171
116
I looked at your set on flickr and there are some nice shots.

What 105 are you shooting with? Some of those are extraordinarily sharp with good color.
Thanks! It is:

32499918383_6236e20be7_h.jpg


I got it from digitalrev: https://store.digitalrev.com/product/nikon-nikkor-af-s-105mm/MTExMw_A_A

if it's the same one which i think it is, price has increased quite a bit since i got it. i remember reading very favorable reviews about the sharpness of this lens and while I'm a relative noob, I have to say i've been extremely satisfied with it. it has spent more time on my camera than my 18-55 kit or 11-16 ultrawide by far since i've bought it, which is saying a lot given what it is. i love shooting with it. it's far heftier than my other two lenses, but this doesn't bother me one bit. i have zero complaints about any aspect of the construction, feel/handling or performance with this thing, and when I use it properly, the results look really great to my eye.

whereas with my ultrawide (tokina 11-16 f/2.8, also a great lens), there are times where i seem to have a harder time telling whether or not i've nailed the focus, which never happens with the 105 or even the 18-55. i originally bought the 105 with the intention of throwing myself into macro and "maybe do some portraits at some point" since it was supposed to be real good for that too. but i've found myself enjoying it for so much more than that. or maybe it's also partly that damn, macro can be challenging... haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: CuriousMike

fralexandr

Platinum Member
Apr 26, 2007
2,289
229
106
www.flickr.com
Thanks! It is:

32499918383_6236e20be7_h.jpg


I got it from digitalrev: https://store.digitalrev.com/product/nikon-nikkor-af-s-105mm/MTExMw_A_A

if it's the same one which i think it is, price has increased quite a bit since i got it. i remember reading very favorable reviews about the sharpness of this lens and while I'm a relative noob, I have to say i've been extremely satisfied with it. it has spent more time on my camera than my 18-55 kit or 11-16 ultrawide by far since i've bought it, which is saying a lot given what it is. i love shooting with it. it's far heftier than my other two lenses, but this doesn't bother me one bit. i have zero complaints about any aspect of the construction, feel/handling or performance with this thing, and when I use it properly, the results look really great to my eye.

whereas with my ultrawide (tokina 11-16 f/2.8, also a great lens), there are times where i seem to have a harder time telling whether or not i've nailed the focus, which never happens with the 105 or even the 18-55. i originally bought the 105 with the intention of throwing myself into macro and "maybe do some portraits at some point" since it was supposed to be real good for that too. but i've found myself enjoying it for so much more than that. or maybe it's also partly that damn, macro can be challenging... haha

My nonflowering plants professor had a 105mm f2.8 nikkor micro. He used it for moss.

A picture I took with my s7
32694895256_9fbe27eca8_b.jpg
 

zCypher

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2002
6,115
171
116
nice pic, the S7 is probably the phone i would have gotten had I not "cheaped out" for the OnePlus 3T.

Still winter up in this...

33002809020_fb7fe3554f_h.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: thestrangebrew1

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
The gum wall in Seattle. The alley was fairly dim so I had my lens wide open, but in hindsight I really had more room to go up with the ISO that would've let me stop this down a bit more for more depth of field. Still kinda cool to zoom way in and see how thin the depth of field is at f/2.8.

XW727dY.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: IronWing

zCypher

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2002
6,115
171
116
Sunrise and sunsets always present nice photo opportunities...!

33593050446_c312398252_h.jpg


if you look hard enough at this one, you'll see a creepy looking face:
33593058706_5d10cbd713_h.jpg
 

Spoooon

Lifer
Mar 3, 2000
11,563
203
106
New toy. A bit of overkill, but got a few photo jobs in the past 3 weeks that helped subsize the cost. :D

Definitely some skill and learning to be done, not instant magic, but is amazing when you nail the picture.

i-J4mV3h8-L.jpg
 

Spoooon

Lifer
Mar 3, 2000
11,563
203
106
Used it for a birthday party yesterday, got some great pics and some not so great ones. :)

Linked some full size pictures, one is a macro with an old Nikon 55/3.5, the other with the Voigtlander 40/1.4. They've been processed and what not, so not like SOOC amazeballs pictures.

Camera is like the least most important part of the whole process, but good to have a nice one. :D