Scalia disagrees with you. From his writings in the Heller decision
No he doesn't. Have the whole thing read and explained to you.
Scalia disagrees with you. From his writings in the Heller decision
We're just very expressive and direct with our emotions.I use data not emotions. Our murder rate is worse than Turkey, Ukraine, North Korea, Niger and Rawanda. It is roughly equivalent to Somalias. No other first world country is within a mile of our murder rate. We are 126 on the list.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
Clearly this sentence has no effect on youNo he doesn't. Have the whole thing read and explained to you.
It is “not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose
I use data not emotions. Our murder rate is worse than Turkey, Ukraine, North Korea, Niger and Rawanda. It is roughly equivalent to Somalias. No other first world country is within a mile of our murder rate. We are 126 on the list.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
Had the people of Venezuela had a 2nd amendment right, their government would have never been able to starve them.
Viva La Revolution!
Keep cherry picking sentences out of the ruling and continue to look like a fool.Clearly this sentence has no effect on you
6 years is all it took
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-18288430
Yeaaaaaaah...." They may also be under-reported for political reasons."
You think???
You know I'm not the most ardent 2A supporter, but I wonder what Brian Frosh's opinion of the Virginia Tech shooting is, given that it was perpetrated with handguns.
How does Maryland's law define assault weapons?
And aside from well publicized mass shootings, most armed murders are done with handguns. By that logic all handguns should be banned/restricted. As despicable as these mass shootings are, assault rifle ban is nothing more than a feel good measure that hides the problem from the view. Say you ban these so-called assault rifles, say these assault weapon mass shootings go away. Say you saved 100 lives per year, now you infringed on the 2A of millions of law abiding gun owners, and you did nothing to address 15,000 handgun murders.
The assault weapon ban is treating the symptom instead of curing the cause. I'd rather see us talking universal healthcare which would provide way to address mental issues for everybody, I'd rather have us find a way to improve economic situation of the lower class as well as end war on drugs which would help with gang violence, I'd rather stop the divisive rhetoric that breeds violence against each other. But no, instead we'll just put a band aid on the problem and call it done. Thanks, but no thanks. That is not the right approach to the current problem.
Just waiting for Kennedy to retire and Ginsburg to retire also.
Just waiting for assault rifles to be banned.
And for clarence thomas to resign after the 2018 elections.
Oh and for trump to resign.
I prayed to my god his noodliness and he will grant my wishes.
From Scalia's own mouth, SkippyKeep cherry picking sentences out of the ruling and continue to look like a fool.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said Sunday that there are “undoubtedly” limits to a person’s right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, but that future court cases will have to decide where to draw the line.
Did you make the obligatory burnt meatball offering?
Dunno, I do know that our murder rate is about 10X that of Austria or Norway and about 5X that of most 1st world nations.
Those examples make a lot more sense.
Not so sure. I think they are scared because they know the truth.well before the law, assualt weapons required a wait
now you just put a heavy barrel on an ar15, do the 4473, and walk out with it
there is a list of guns that are too evil to own
the m1a is on it, but the ar10 is not
the ak is on it, but the mini 30 is not
its really a laughable law if you read it
oh and frosh is an idiot, proven fact
the case mentioned was appealed to SCOTUS, who declined to take it on. just like they declined the california appeal
eventually they will have to rule on something
Thank you. Anti 2A people need to get to work on a constitutional amendment.Unfortunately - the 2nd amendment states very clearly - an armed "militia". Militia is a term for military armed soldier. So ya, it doesn't state the right for an armed farmer, hunter, not sportsman, etc. So, as weird as it sounds the second amendement clearly protects ALL GUNS (weapons) used for war - period. The government or anybody else cannot ( judges, presidents, etc.) pick and choose which gun, which clip, which scope,etc. So, to legally change this a constitutional amendment would need to be passed. So, lets get to it.
