I'm not trying to get a dismissal out of you. What do you know that you aren't saying? Did somebody at nVidia put a bug in your ear about this and now you are pushing the issue trying to get people to stumble onto something by themselves.
Have you gotten yourself a 7970 yet to o your own testing like you stated you were doing, well you said you were shopping for one. I have had a 680 and didn't notice a difference in every day gaming, well except that the overclocking left a lot to be desired.
Nobody at Nvidia put a bug anywhere. But you know i can say this till I'm out of air and it's not believable, so why bother saying it?
Anyway, there isn't anything that I "know" about that I'm hiding. I just want this out in the open. If the big question that everyone is thinking is "WHY" do I want it out in the open, well duh, who wouldn't?
If I appear like I've been bitten by a rabid snuffleuppagus, it's probably due to the original thread crappers. Crap leaves a really bad taste in ones mouth and it's not easily forgotten. So, I'm on the defensive. On the lookout for BS and my god there is palunty.
So, basically If AMD doesn't deserve the performance "crown" then they shouldn't have it. If TR or H didn't mention any of this there is a good chance nobody else would have bothered. So, AMD (my speculation) bet on all review sites sticking to the standard fps rules benchmarks.
Well, it looks like that era is over now. You know TR will be doing this every review now. As will H probably.
On the other hand, if AMD can release a fix for the latency and still maintain high framerates (and I don't think they can, but that is just my speculation) then they fully deserve the single GPU performance crown.
As per Scott Wasson, AMD is looking into it as it raised some internal flags.
So lava, if one is poked with a stick enough, the pokee could very become the poker. As you have seen.