Armed Militia Members take over Federal Building in Oregon

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,994
31,557
146
They haven't attacked anybody!! You're just a bag of emotion knee-jerking at this point. Best of luck making whatever point you're trying to make. :thumbsup:

Are you happy that they have taken the public land (that you pay for) and claimed as part of their own personal fiefdom, stationing redneck snipers on guard towers and trucking in children to act as body shields?

Is this something that you actually support?

These 2 guys never attacked anyone--they didn't even have guns:
blackpanthers_security.jpg


Yet you and your kin were just a bag of emotion knee-jerking reaction mongers when they had the temerity to stand outside a polling station.
 
Last edited:

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
I apologize for getting in your face like that.
There is no apology necessary. I'm a live and let live guy.

I will always say what is on my mind. All my friends, my family and my wife know that. I'm the kind of guy where people know that if they don't think they want to hear the answer I'm going to give, they better not ask the question. I don't really give a shit what people think of me or why. Life's too damned short to worry about what other people think of me.

Many of my co-worker's used to say I was an asshole. My answer was that I didn't take this job to make friends. Those co-workers that "got" me, we had friendships. I never lamented over those with whom I didn't "click".
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
There is no apology necessary. I'm a live and let live guy.

I will always say what is on my mind. All my friends, my family and my wife know that. I'm the kind of guy where people know that if they don't think they want to hear the answer I'm going to give, they better not ask the question. I don't really give a shit what people think of me or why. Life's too damned short to worry about what other people think of me.

Many of my co-worker's used to say I was an asshole. My answer was that I didn't take this job to make friends. Those co-workers that "got" me, we had friendships. I never lamented over those with whom I didn't "click".

Tool Shops in general are a land many people will never venture into.

It's not like working in a Starbucks.

;)
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,407
136
Are you happy that they have taken the public land (that you pay for) and claimed as part of their own personal fiefdom, stationing redneck snipers on guard towers and trucking in children to act as body shields?

Is this something that you actually support?

These 2 guys never attacked anyone--they didn't even have guns:
blackpanthers_security.jpg


Yet you and your kin were just a bag of emotion knee-jerking reaction mongers when they had the temerity to stand outside a polling station.

I pretty much agree with everything. I've seen this picture floating around. I have no idea what those guys were up to however I do feel voting stations are sacred and nobody should be milling around the entrance with any agenda other than voting and saying a brief hello to a neighbor. That doesn't mean someone can hold signs and such they simply should be well away from the entrance.

Again I have no idea what these guys were up to they may have been leaving after voting but anything else and they should be told to take it across the street.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
If anybody is interested in reading the 9th circuit decision.

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/02/07/12-30337.pdf

The reasoning is a bit scary when you think about it. They cite other ridiculous sentencing decisions as a reason why throwing people in jail for 5 years over 140 acres of burned public land is a-ok and not cruel and unusual.

I also find it troubling the defendants entered into a plea with the govt, and the govt appealed the sentencing. IMO if a defendant and state enters a plea, both sides should waive rights to further appeals, not just one side. 1 year in jail for burning 140 acres of public land should had satisfied the govts position. To appeal that is spiteful.
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,251
55,804
136
If anybody is interested in reading the 9th circuit decision.

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/02/07/12-30337.pdf

The reasoning is a bit scary when you think about it. They cite other ridiculous sentencing decisions as a reason why throwing people in jail for 5 years over 140 acres of burned public land is a-ok.

Well their main holding is that the district judge sentenced them illegally (below the mandatory minimum). He did so with the argument that the mandatory minimum was unconstitutional, which is what the appeals court found to be wrong.

While I agree that 5 years as a minimum for this sentence seems high, it's certainly (and unfortunately) not out of line with punishments we give for much less serious crimes like selling drugs. Arson carries with it serious risk to life and property far in excess of any drug sentence, so if those aren't unconstitutional it's hard to see how this would be.

To me the real answer is that we should drastically reduce prison sentences for basically every crime. That doesn't mean that these guys get a special waiver though.

I also find it troubling the defendants entered into a plea with the govt, and the govt appealed the sentencing. IMO if a defendant and state enters a plea, both sides should waive rights to further appeals, not just one side. 1 year in jail for burning 140 acres of public land should had satisfied the govts position. To appeal that is spiteful.

While I agree with your sentiment, I thought the court's opinion on this was pretty persuasive. The Hammonds argued that there was an implicit waiver of the right to appeal that's part of the plea. I don't know about you but situations where we start implicitly waiving rights to court access sound like a bad idea to me. Imagine if the situation were reversed: say that the Hammonds only plead guilty due to some egregious government misconduct of some sort. Should their right to appeal have been considered to be implicitly waived?
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,617
33,336
136
5 years for burning 140 acres doesn't seem out of line to me. That sounds like a pretty big fucking fire.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
5 years for burning 140 acres doesn't seem out of line to me. That sounds like a pretty big fucking fire.

Hey that was just to cover up the poaching to begin with.

Game Wardens have more authority than a lot of enforcement to begin with.

That would be a good reality show, not sure if anyone has done it.

Being a game warden is almost like being a US Marshall, I guess you run amok and look for people trying to kill critters illegally and bust em.
 
Last edited:

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,819
48,538
136
Reading some of the longer backstory on this family and their run-ins with the law/BLM I can't say I'm very sympathetic to their (arguably) improper sentence being appealed by the justice department.

As to the morons that have attached themselves like parasites to this for their own attention whoring I say wait them out then come back 6 months later, arrest everybody involved, and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.
 
Last edited:

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,797
572
126
Useless comments from stupid, trolling cunts. Thanks for your contributions, you worthless fucks.

Go read my last few posts there they weren't rude asshole post unlike what has become common practice for a few, but thanks for showing how willing you are to go to the insults and name calling.



____________________
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
More being indoctrinated as future terrorists. It's just a fact.

Sorry to burst your bubble.

When you have 6 years old's running around yelling death to infidels and things like that, it's just an issue also.

Have been some 12 and 13 years old's in the past leading some pretty large terror organizations actually.

But that is enough of the misdirection on your part for now.

Ruh ro, every Lefty in P&N will be calling you a POS xenophobic racist brown baby killer in 3, 2, ...
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
8,090
10,787
136
I wonder if some journalist will dig up if Bundy is receiving subsidies? Wouldn't be surprised.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,651
35,457
136
Cut the power and cut the disability checks and the thing should blow over.
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
I liked the post that said build a wall around it and turn it into a federal prison lol.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
17,021
5,085
136
While I agree that 5 years as a minimum for this sentence seems high, it's certainly (and unfortunately) not out of line with punishments we give for much less serious crimes like selling drugs. Arson carries with it serious risk to life and property far in excess of any drug sentence, so if those aren't unconstitutional it's hard to see how this would be.


Having personally seen the destruction wildfires have wrought on homes, towns and resources, I think 5 years may be too light.

In the old days, out here in the West, these skunks would have been fortunate if they escaped the hangman.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,453
136
Having personally seen the destruction wildfires have wrought on homes, towns and resources, I think 5 years may be too light.

In the old days, out here in the West, these skunks would have been fortunate if they escaped the hangman.

No kidding, arson out west = huge fucking deal, not that it's any more acceptable in NYC. But 5 years for that seems very reasonable, if not slightly lenient.
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
Reading some of the longer backstory on this family and their run-ins with the law/BLM I can't say I'm very sympathetic to their (arguably) improper sentence being appealed by the justice department.

As to the morons that have attached themselves like parasites to this for their own attention whoring I say wait them out then come back 6 months later, arrest everybody involved, and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

And while they are holed up in the federal building.... go burn down their personal residences/property as vengeance for them burning the public land. Might help them to understand that burning other peoples property is not so fun on the receiving end. I am longing for the day when these people are all in prison serving life sentences.

I am having a hard time distinguishing between right wing nutbars and muslim terrorists, is there any difference at all?
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
17,021
5,085
136
And while they are holed up in the federal building.... go burn down their personal residences/property as vengeance for them burning the public land. Might help them to understand that burning other peoples property is not so fun on the receiving end. I am longing for the day when these people are all in prison serving life sentences.

I am having a hard time distinguishing between right wing nutbars and muslim terrorists, is there any difference at all?

The people holed-up in the wildlife sanctuary are not the people who were convicted of arson..

They simply claim that conviction as one of their grievances.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,251
55,804
136
The people holed-up in the wildlife sanctuary are not the people who were convicted of arson..

They simply claim that conviction as one of their grievances.

Yeah, the people convicted of arson have said they don't want anything to do with these clowns.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
they were told at the plea deal that the minimum was 5 years. So I dont see why they would cry about it after the fact.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
And while they are holed up in the federal building.... go burn down their personal residences/property as vengeance for them burning the public land. Might help them to understand that burning other peoples property is not so fun on the receiving end. I am longing for the day when these people are all in prison serving life sentences.

I am having a hard time distinguishing between right wing nutbars and muslim terrorists, is there any difference at all?
Because burning some land with little to no value, exempt for cattle grazing, in the middle of nowhere, is the same.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,819
48,538
136
And while they are holed up in the federal building.... go burn down their personal residences/property as vengeance for them burning the public land. Might help them to understand that burning other peoples property is not so fun on the receiving end. I am longing for the day when these people are all in prison serving life sentences.

I am having a hard time distinguishing between right wing nutbars and muslim terrorists, is there any difference at all?

From everything I've read the Hammonds want nothing to do with this action and are willing obey the courts. These assholes just showed up to start crap using this as an excuse.