10^20 mammals have ever existed. How much variation can you get in that number of animals, by blind processes? How many changes needed to occur in order for a mouse like creature to turn into people, whales, and bats? You've only got around 10^20 opportunities to get all this done.
Any change requiring 3 simultaneous mutations will happen once every 10^27 cell divisions.
Ah yes, the creationist bastardizing science.
Let's not forget the bad math he purposes
1) 10^20 mammals (let's ignore the fact that this is a estimate). Does the creationist represent the number of all living organisms? Nope. His math completely forgets the fact there are other non-mammalian organisms that preceded the evolution of mammals. But that's what creationists do, distort facts.
2) As already shown in this thread:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=37827878&postcount=525 This creationist posts number he doesn't understand, cherrypicks data, and doesn't understand data.
3) What he won't tell you is the mutation rate of other genes. He only likes his Michael Behe number, and ignores all other mutational rate. Why should we accept his 10^27 number (when in that other thread, he threw around a mutation rate of 10^20)?
4) Why is he NOT talking about the mutational rate of atovoquone resistance is 10^12.
So, as I asked back then, why did you post a manuscript that completely contradicted you point?
But creationist trolls like him merely want to bastardize math, science, and logic just to fulfill is own assumptions about the world.
Facebook
Twitter